Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi

I posted a while ago asking for advice on buying a chronograph to take apart and learn on. Well I ended up going for quantity rather than quality and got the attached 3 inexpensive ones instead. Photo was taken on my phone so a bit fuzzy sorry.

On the left is a really good condition used Poljot 3133, similar to a Valjoux 7734 I think. Then in the middle is the oddest one, I can find out very little about it. It's an AATOS DismasSSB automatic 3 register chronograph that I bought new for less than £100. The best I've been able to find is that it is a Chinese factory copy/clone of the Valjoux 7750 (or 7753 given the subdial placement). Lastly there is a new Alpha Daytona Paul Newman. I slightly regret buying this as it is so obviously an homage watch - not a fake as it is clearly branded Alpha, but it is also clear which watch it is meant to remind you of. Mind you, plenty of other, better known watch brands do the same. It has a Sea-Gull ST1903 movement with the slightly pointless 3rd 24 hour dial. I should have spent a bit more money and bought the 1963 with the 2 registers instead. The movement is Sea-Gulls version (legitimate I think) of the Venus 175.

So there you have it. I now have 3 mechanical chronographs, none of which I know anything about, nor do I have movement holders for any of them, and I know nothing about taking them apart, dealing with pushers, chrono hands etc. What should I do now?

 

post-373-0-57453300-1454836563_thumb.jpg

Posted

I'd like to know do you buy this type of watch for what they intended for? or is it more for show because of more buttons/winders and subsidiary dials and hands.

Posted

Purchase a copy of this http://www.amazon.co.uk/Complicated-Watches-Their-Repair-Donald/dp/0719800900 and read it, also watch as many videos on the subject you can find, then.................enjoy yourself!

Don't forget to wright a report on your progress in the "walkthrough" section when you get started.

PS nice watches! :)

Thanks George

 

I've actually got a copy of that and have read it, but will need to read it again and more slowly. I've read posts before, from yourself and others, about it being important to have the proper movement holder with pushers for working on chronographs. If the AATOS is based on the 7750/7753 I could get one for that I would think as you do see those for sale. Cousins has a A*F plastic one for around £25, I wonder if that would be good enough, or if I should look for a metal one? And where would I find ones for the other two? I don't think I have ever seen one for either the Poljot or Alpha, or the models they are based on.

 

Stephen

Posted

Hi Stephen,

 

I'm very interested in hearing from you about how it all went, even the part of the holder which I still don't have since I don't work much on chronometers, just light stuff.

 

About the pushers, there are different solutions, including the pressed on and the screwed on. Some come with "C" or similar clips and some don't. You will know what type is in each of your watches as you go along if the study of the case -- and experience -- doesn't give it up. In my mind it is a short, interesting and careful learning curve but once you have it, there is nothing to it.

 

If you have any questions I'm sure me or any of our knowledgeable members will be able to help.

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

  • Like 1
Posted

There is a YouTuber that goes by Ratfaced Git who does a lot of walkthroughs of Russian movement disassembly and reassembly. And he has done the Poljot 3133. He's an amateur but it is a good introduction to the anatomy and function of the movement.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Depends what sizes of watches you mostly service . If you were to say pocket watches then you might benefit by wholly replacing the 9010 for 9020. As a rough guide hp500 is twice the viscosity of 9020 which is twice the viscosity of 9010 at 20°c.  So hp500 would give you a more mid-range oil between thin 9010 and HP1300, but as it happens hp750 is more mid- range than hp500, but is that more or less useful when oiling a train of wheels. After the barrel arbor the jump down in pivot size is around half, then after the centre wheel maybe more than half until the escapement. And pivot size isn't especially a deciding factor, as the torque and speed of a pivot would be more relevant when thinking about which oil to choose. So 750 might only be useful on a centre wheel and nothing else, and 500 might be better than 1300 for oiling the centre wheel but still comprises the rest of the train, where 9020 would be ok for the train but too thin for the centre wheel, leaving only 1300 for the oiling of it. You see the problem we're having here. What can be ok for one thing is less ok for another in a different way, damping down power compared to oil spread.  Maybe mixing a drop from two opposite range viscosity synthetic oils will give you some approximate thickness oil in-between . You want a short answer now,  I tnink I'd go with the 9020. Now be prepared for a whole host of different answers.
    • So, working on watches and your karma at the same time: win-win situation! 
    • @SteveF ,  Go on to Dr ranfft website,  Enter keywords Omega 26.5T3  ranfft .  There Dr ranfft  has listed all related calibers to this family, all which beat the same frequency,  any balance complete of this family fit your watch. This would only expenad your choice of balance complete.  Recolleting your hairspring is easy, but matching it with a balance of the family is challanging. Regs        
    • Yes, it looks much better, but at this point the main thing is to make the spring in one plain. so picture from side will show this better. Now it is seen that #1 bending is needed, which is normal.
×
×
  • Create New...