Jump to content

Two More Cheapies Bought On A Whim


Recommended Posts

Sometimes, just to vary the collection, I'll run through "wristwatches" on eBay - limiting my search to "UK", "Auction" and "Mechanical (movement)" - and see what comes up that might be interesting or different. Just the other day I did a couple of cheap snipes - and won both a by a whisker. So, with a bit of luck, the postman will be ringing twice...

 

The top one is a Zim - about which I know nothing except that it's Russian. And the lower one is an Ertus - about which I know absolutely nothing except that's Swiss, with a very interesting dial. I'll see how I like them - might keep them - might flog them off...

 

Zim%20face.jpg

 

Zim%20movement.jpg

 

Ertus%20face.jpg

 

Ertus%20movement.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do like the second one - very nice.

 

the first one - broken dial feet possibly?

 

Difficult to tell from the eBay pic whether the Zim dial is off kilter or not... I'll find out tomorrow. The Ertus dial is what attracted it to me - plus Swiss... 17 jewels... And the strap looks very yucky - but that's soon remedied.

Edited by WillFly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never bought a Hirsch strap - are they worth the asking price - or overpriced?

 

Here's a nice one to match the Ertus - at just £7 more than I paid for the watch!

 

http://www.amazon.co.uk/HIRSCH-Liberty-Nature-Calfskin-Buckle/dp/B002ZJMHX2/ref=sr_1_10?ie=UTF8&qid=1396452838&sr=8-10&keywords=hirsch+watch+strap

Edited by WillFly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hirsch make very high quality straps - I used to sell them when I had a shop and was very happy with the quality. 

 

I will only have Hirsch on my watches - but Condor make good straps also, I used to sell those as well and was quite impressed. But I hate Apollo straps :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting watches Will, I particularly like the Ertus. The balance jewel assembly is the same type fitted to the wee Rolex I've just been working on. Never did find out hoe to remove the balance jewels.

Do you know what make the movement is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I know at the moment is that the movement is stamped "Ertus" - and I can't find out much more from the web at the moment. From the photo, the movement and dial look very nice - well worrth the £26 I paid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've replaced the Zim dial picture with a new one as the watch arrived this morning. I haven't had the back off yet but it's wound and running sweetly if my ear is anything to go by. There's some muck on the underside of the crystal and there's some crude reluming on the 5-minute markers, but I'll see how it goes. I may well pass it on. I quite like the odd bit of Russian around the place now and then... What's clear is that the case is slightly off-kilter, but the dial is sitting right on the movement. An interesting little cheapie, really!.

 

Zim%20face.JPG

Edited by WillFly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't tell from the photo, because there's no side slant to the view, but it's clear under a high-mag lens that the base dial is original, if worn slightly. The lumps of lume on the 5-minute markers have clearly been dabbed on at a later date. I'm tempted to see if they can be taken off, but I'm wary of damaging the original marker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've now photographed the Zim movement myself. For a fiver, it's a simple, rugged little movement - it's keeping perfect time so far, so I'm not complaining. It'll do until I get my Omega... :lolu:

 

Zim%20movement.JPG

Edited by WillFly
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've re-strapped the Ertus, which is running very nicely indeed. It's just 30mm in diameter. The watchmaker was Paul Ertusi who registered his company as a watchmaking concern in Switzerland in 1929. The Ertus brand was specifically registered in 1938 - and I'm guessing this little beaut was made in the following decade. judging by the size and style. What a contrast with my Hamilton Khaki Mechamical - 44mm in diameter as befits a movement (ETA 6497) originally made for pocket watches...

 

HamandErt.jpg

Edited by WillFly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
    • thinking of where epilam should be removed did you know there was a patent that covers this? At least for the escapement I'm attaching it. GB1057607A-1 epilame.pdf
    • Back home...printing now.  Will report results
    • Oh well, if Master @nickelsilver says it's the way to go, then it is the way to go! I stand corrected! 🫡 Are there any other places where you're supposed to remove the epilame from the contact point of rubbing? I don't think so! Thanks for the effort @Neverenoughwatches, much appreciated! 🙂👍
×
×
  • Create New...