Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yes, that's it! Thank you very much. This is a very strange movement 🤔

IMG_20240803_070243~2.jpg

Since then I have cleaned it and reassembled, but with a strange result: the second hand doesn't move. I will search on the Internet the cause of this failure.

Posted (edited)

How does the seconds drive and pinion look and did you not do any test before fitting the balance?

Edit

Edit just realised that there appears to be 2 versions of the 217?

Does yours have the centre seconds?

Edited by AndyGSi
Posted
38 minutes ago, BlueHarp said:

Since then I have cleaned it and reassembled, but with a strange result: the second hand doesn't move.

Did you press that large wheel above the train bridge back on firmly enough?

If that is loose, the seconds hand will not be driven properly.

Posted
28 minutes ago, rjenkinsgb said:

Reading through, the first photo was from before cleaning and re-assembly, so presumably taken part way through the disassembly??

 

Looking at it in comparison with this eBay listing everything including the seconds drive wheel appears to be their.

image.png.1a3f6befb7bf655bec2e3eea8e832d96.png

  • Like 1
Posted

Here are the parts specifically dedicated to making the second hand work. The shaft goes through the movement into the second hand, and it is motionned by the wheel on the back of the movement. That is very unusual!

At the moment the watch works perfectly without all of that (i.e. only with the hour and minute hands), so it seems there is something wrong with those parts.

IMG_20240804_151409~2.jpg

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, BlueHarp said:

That is very unusual!

Not at all, the first version of a sweep second.

Maybe the pinion wants an upper pivot? 😀

Edited by praezis
  • Like 1
Posted

It is (or was) a very common system.

You just have to make sure the driver wheel is pressed firmly on the pivot extension that protrudes through the train bridge.

In you photo of the assembled movement, it looks like that wheel may be upside down, so the the wheel itself is not in line with the small centre pinion?

Posted

Thank you for your remarks. I have tried the other way, but it's still working irregularly. It's far better without the second hand ... but too fast! I feel that this watch is too complicated for a beginner like me.

Posted
2 minutes ago, BlueHarp said:

Thank you for your remarks. I have tried the other way, but it's still working irregularly. It's far better without the second hand ... but too fast! I feel that this watch is too complicated for a beginner like me.

So is there a pinion in their that we just can't see on the photo?

I presume what you're showing as 2 parts was like this when you stripped it?

 

Posted

Here is a picture of the caliber as it is now, as well as a picture of the watch itself. At the moment it is working, but it stops from time to time. Another point is that it moves too fast, although the regulator is on "slow" position. I guess something is wrong with the hairspring (it looks irregularly curved).

Still a lot of work to do, but this is the best way to learn. I need to be more patient🙂

IMG_20240806_084159~2.jpg

IMG_20240806_084059~2.jpg

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for the replies! Here's a photo of the front of the clock and a GIF animation of the movement (exposed by removing the black cap in the centre of the clock). You can see the behaviour of the gears. It's a fairly valuable clock from the 80s (Braun ABW 35). I'm not sure if replacing the movement would diminish the value, so I'd prefer to keep the original parts if it's easy to fix. But since the movement itself is pretty generic, I guess, maybe replacing it wouldn't make any difference with regard to the value of the clock? Or would it? I suppose the value is mostly in the design.
    • Well, my fundamental stance is that I want to go in and out without leaving any trace other than a shining, perfectly running movement. So, no scratchings on the inside of the case back lid, no marred screws, no debris, no fingerprints, and so on. That is, my goal is to make it impossible for the FBI to track me down. As a professional, I suppose you might want to keep track of returning watches, but as @JohnR725 mentioned, we can keep detailed computer records without marking the watch at all. That may not be true for every watch, but luxury and COSC-certified movements do have unique numbers. John also says it’s best to leave no sign you were ever there, and I couldn't agree more. Now, suppose the Sea-Dweller I'm working on is one day scrapped, and you want to sell the case-back separately (perhaps the case was destroyed in a plane crash). Then the scribbles on the inside no longer reflect the current movement inside the case. Also, the engraving will likely halve the market value of the case back. It had been "sleeping" for about a week and a half. Yes, the "debris/old lubricant" theory is my hypothesis as well! It will be interesting to see what I find once I have time to start disassembling the movement.
    • I've repaired a few of these, having some success with stripping and cleaning the mechanism.  They are so cheap though, its hardly worth the effort in many cases.
    • Get well soon Old Hippy, torn muscles.,  not good
    • Id love to see how he has the output shaft mounted to this setup, as I have the same rotary stage and stepper in my build.
×
×
  • Create New...