Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all of you,

I've just received a pocket watch without any brand name wich looks quite old, and the only information I could see on the movement is 7020. I haven't disassembled it yet, and I must admit I am a bit reluctant to do it as it seems old (but it works well).

Could anyone help me? Here are some photos.

 

s-l1600.jpg

s-l1600 (3).jpg

s-l1600 (4).jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Lovely dial. 15 jewels and Breguet overcoil on the hairspring. Have you got a pic showing all the movement, i.e. looking from the crown?

I've no idea what the movement is, it will be easier to ID once out of the case and measured.

Posted

Might be able to identify it once the diameter is given and a photo of the keyless works but no guarantee. 

Ancre-----Lever escapement
Levees visibles---visible (jeweled)pallets
Double Plateau-----double roller
Spirale Breguet--Overcoil hairspring
Balancier compense----Compensated balance wheel
15 rubis---15jewels

Posted (edited)

Looks to be in good condition, and fairly modern.  I've never seen a bent regulator arm like that. Also the click is in an odd position. Should make identifying easier.

I found a comment suggesting that Cortebert are known for curved regulators

Edited by mikepilk
Posted
4 hours ago, BlueHarp said:

@mikepilkThank you for your reply. Here is another picture.

IMG_20240506_175803~2.jpg

This is more complex than a standard pocket watch owing to fact it has 2 driving springs. A mainspring and a smaller spring that acts directly on the escapement. This direct spring provides a more constant torque helping to maintain isochronism and doesn't suffer the energy differences that a mainspring does delivering power through the gear train. The mainspring keeps the escapement driving spring wound up.

5 hours ago, BlueHarp said:

Hi all of you,

I've just received a pocket watch without any brand name wich looks quite old, and the only information I could see on the movement is 7020. I haven't disassembled it yet, and I must admit I am a bit reluctant to do it as it seems old (but it works well).

Could anyone help me? Here are some photos.

 

s-l1600.jpg

s-l1600 (3).jpg

s-l1600 (4).jpg

I have one very similar to this, i wouldn't disassemble it until you are ready to. 

Posted

@Neverenoughwatches Many thanks for your remarks. As I wrote earlier, I was a bit reluctant to disassemble this movement, and you gave me further motives to be careful. I'll just remove it from its case so as to clean it a little.

Posted
8 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

This is more complex than a standard pocket watch owing to fact it has 2 driving springs. A mainspring and a smaller spring that acts directly on the escapement. This direct spring provides a more constant torque helping to maintain isochronism and doesn't suffer the energy differences that a mainspring does delivering power through the gear train. The mainspring keeps the escapement driving spring wound up.

Rich, this one seems rather regular movement to me. Yes, what You describe exists, but I doubt that the one on the picture is something similar.

Posted
9 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

This is more complex than a standard pocket watch owing to fact it has 2 driving springs. A mainspring and a smaller spring that acts directly on the escapement. This direct spring provides a more constant torque helping to maintain isochronism and doesn't suffer the energy differences that a mainspring does delivering power through the gear train. The mainspring keeps the escapement driving spring wound up.

I have one very similar to this, i wouldn't disassemble it until you are ready to. 

I'm with @nevenbekriev Rich, it just looks a normal movement to me .... unless you know differently.

Do you have pics of yours? Who is the manufacturer? 

Posted

It seems this topic is becoming very interesting 😀. Here are two more pictures that might help to identify the movement.

The diameter of the dial side is 40mm, and the other side 36,5mm.

IMG_20240507_081159~2.jpg

IMG_20240507_081214~2.jpg

Posted

Looks as if some screws have been replaced. The regulator is curved not bent🤣. Look in the BestFit Catalogues on here that I posted ages ago for the I D.

Posted
16 hours ago, mikepilk said:

I just broke my Rule #1 - Do not buy a watch unless you can see a good pic of the movement.

I currently don't have anything to work on (itchy fingers) and as I just got this for £20 from ebay, (sold as "working"), I thought it was worth the gamble.

I liked the look of it, It has 21 jewels, so I'm assuming automatic. The back says "Incabloc" and "waterproof", so it looks to be reasonable quality. The case looks good.

From the little I've found on google, the Credos Lugran company was formed in 1954., and bought by Bucherer in the 60s. This looks 50s-60s to me. There's a reference to using good quality ETA movements. I hope so. 

s-l1600(7).thumb.jpg.9866cbbdef6ffd6914009ed07715a377.jpg

s-l1600.thumb.jpg.c211bd3dd4e95b1c391fa5207c796a1e.jpg

 

 

 

 

7 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

I thought i read Remontoire inside the case ?

If it has a e on the end, Remontoire then yes two springs, without the e, stem wound.

Posted
1 minute ago, RichardHarris123 said:

 

If it has a e on the end, Remontoire then yes two springs, without the e, stem wound.

Ah i didn't notice that but it was past one i  the morning when read it 

1 hour ago, BlueHarp said:

It seems this topic is becoming very interesting 😀. Here are two more pictures that might help to identify the movement.

The diameter of the dial side is 40mm, and the other side 36,5mm.

IMG_20240507_081159~2.jpg

IMG_20240507_081214~2.jpg

The keyless works used for identification are hidden under the watchmakers side. You would have to disassemble it, you dont need to worry so much about that, doubtful it is a Remontoire as i suggested earlier this morning 🤦‍♂️ but you never know 😁

  • Like 1
Posted

I recall a video on YT from Steffen Pahlow where he talks about getting himself a Chronometre (for which he paid more than he would have liked), but in his words "I had to. It is a Chronometre."

I am wondering if you have more watch there than what you are aware of? Especially with what @Neverenoughwatches mentioned about two springs.

Posted

That's true. It is not a chronometer. As a matter of fact, I got it with another timepiece which is e real one, and only that (not a watch).

I add a few pictures of my Chronometer / watch. no indication of a brand ...

IMG_20240507_125915~2.jpg

IMG_20240507_130120~2.jpg

IMG_20240507_130923~2.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

I'm not convinced it is a chronometer, just because it says so on the dial.  I think the two springs was a misunderstanding. 

The chronometer on the dial might just be a brand name, looking back yes i was mislead by the mention of Remontoir inside the case. Still not sure why it says Ancre Remontoir which translates to anchor winder, i imagine that means lever winder which still suggests to me 2 winding springs. I'm sure i have that same watch with chronometer on the dial ,I've never ventured inside it. My missus looks after 90% of my watches , so i will get hold of that one and have a look inside.

15 minutes ago, BlueHarp said:

That's true. It is not a chronometer. As a matter of fact, I got it with another timepiece which is e real one, and only that (not a watch).

I add a few pictures of my Chronometer / watch. no indication of a brand ...

IMG_20240507_125915~2.jpg

IMG_20240507_130120~2.jpg

IMG_20240507_130923~2.jpg

Haha no not a remontoire, looks very basic.  Good to see the keyless works, can you measure the plate size to cut down on the search for them.

1 hour ago, BlueHarp said:

That's true. It is not a chronometer. As a matter of fact, I got it with another timepiece which is e real one, and only that (not a watch).

I add a few pictures of my Chronometer / watch. no indication of a brand ...

IMG_20240507_125915~2.jpg

IMG_20240507_130120~2.jpg

IMG_20240507_130923~2.jpg

Can you lay out that brass bridge cover as well please next to the other 3 pieces.

Posted
23 minutes ago, BlueHarp said:

The diameter of the dial side is 40mm, and the other side 36,5mm.

Here is another picture

IMG_20240507_150829~2.jpg

Ok thanks  it was just the brass cover next to the previous 3 keyless parts. Normally i wouldn't have expected that to be used to identify,  but I've searched American,  German and French part catalogs and coming up with nothing for the set lever,set spring and  yoke. I will have another look later today.

34 minutes ago, BlueHarp said:

The diameter of the dial side is 40mm, and the other side 36,5mm.

Here is another picture

IMG_20240507_150829~2.jpg

There is another way but you would have to measure the stem very accurately. 

  • Like 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, BlueHarp said:

Ok. >Here is the picture

IMG_20240507_171746~2.jpg

Its ok blueharp the pictures you provided earlier of the 3 keyless components,  the setting lever, the setting lever spring and the yoke plus the brass cover plate should be enough. If they are not listed anywhere then you are relying on any lettering on the movement or someone that just knows the movement from experience. 

Posted

I've started trying to use the Betfit, but I don't know which measurement I must take for the caliber. The diameter of the dial side is 40mm, and the other side 36,5mm 🤔.

Posted
22 minutes ago, BlueHarp said:

I've started trying to use the Betfit, but I don't know which measurement I must take for the caliber. The diameter of the dial side is 40mm, and the other side 36,5mm 🤔.

Here's a size chart. 40mm is about 17¾L. I looked in Bestfit but couldn't find anything close. 

 

image.thumb.png.0f98b258893542920246edbf815a3991.png

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Excellent info, thank you! So when you say "conforms to the standard" does that mean, for example, that parts are interchangeable between brands and ages, or that you could use accessories built for that 110-year old one on a newer one that was built in the 1990s? Also, thank you for taking the time to answer my questions and your patience.
    • It was first a brand, but became a standardized style. So you will find some older lathes actually marked "Webster Whitcomb" and many other makers who built WW lathes conforming to the same dimensions for spindle height, bed shape, attachment setup, collet size and design. https://www.lathes.co.uk/derbyshire/ So when someone mentions a WW lathe today, they are talking about any lathe that conforms to the standard, which could be a 110 year old American made lathe or a European made lathe from the 1960s or something else.
    • Hi guys, just a little thank you for the CLOCKBARN site in America.  I purchased a TIMETRAX APMLIFIER to help with setting clocks in beat from CLOCKBARN it arrived on time and when tested worked ok.  A week later I had occasion to need it again, this time nothing the unit was dead. Checked out batteries , probes etc , nothing.    I messaged CLOCKBARN  to this effect.  I got a prompt reply that he would send a replacement which duly arrived today and having tested it it’s ok.  So I can recommend the site should you need to use it. The person,persons who run it are genuine guys.  So thank you CLOCKBARN  for your excellent service.
    • Hi there! You have learned how professional watchmakers feel about Timex. It is very difficult to find one willing to work on them, for a few reasons: 1) a lot of them wrongly believe Timex cannot be serviced, are riveted together. This is a myth. 2) when serviced, they still cannot meet the performance standards of jeweled mechanical watches (-20sec/day is good enough for a Timex) 3) customers are unwilling to pay the watchmaker's hourly bench rates because the watches are worth very little The service manual for the M33 is available at https://heritage1854.com/m33 but you also need the M32 and M31 manuals because they build on each other (31 is the base, 32 has date, 33 has day and date) https://heritage1854.com/m31 https://heritage1854.com/m32 A stuck date changeover can be due to a missing, bent or broken detent spring (part 2576 in the manual) or the date wheel (2556) got stuck or separated from its post, or maybe disengaged from the hour wheel. With a little confidence, these are not difficult to repair and parts are pretty much interchangeable with any other Timex from the same era having the same features. So it is very easy to find inexpensive spares in the form of junk watches (don't bother trying to search for individual spare parts). My recommendation would be to find a junk Timex with an M25 (older manual wind with date) and practice a little with it. Follow the service manual from the same website. The automatics are a bit more difficult to work on but once you get a feel for how they fit together, you can make an attempt at your automatic and you would be able to use many spare parts from the M25 if necessary. To work with most Timex movements, you do not need a lot of tools. Just one screwdriver, 1.4mm is a good size, tweezers, and hand levers to remove the hands plus hand pusher tools to replace them. Of course if you want to do a full cleaning and restoration more is needed. But to get it apart and diagnose, only minimal tools.
    • I do indeed have some programming and electronics know-how. 3 decades writing code for a living, and playing with microcontrollers as a hobby. 🙂 It helps with my actual living of being a voice actor because I can maintain my own equipment- no one around to replace the caps or the tube in an obscure botique mic that isn't made or supported any longer. Also saves money maintaining and cleaning my own interfaces and mixers when they develop problems in the faders and such. That said... I do have a question that, I'm sure, will betray my ignorance about certain areas that I have yet to fill in. I understand a "WW" lathe is a "Webster Whitcomb", but from what I understand that is a style of lathe and not a brand, correct? If someone would be willing to clarify and maybe expand on the terminology, it would be helpful so I can better understand the advice being given and know what I need to look into to further my knowledge. For example, a Sherline mill would appear to be either a separate piece of gear or an attachment/expansion to their smaller lathe. When you say you have a WW lathe and a sherline mill, can you say exactly what devices you have? Thank you! (I just realized I have a few Raspberry Pis and some Arduinos of various form factors around here I could probably put to good use in a scenario like you describe above).  
×
×
  • Create New...