Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

I'm working on a Ball 999B 16s PW; serial 1B7401 .  The balance staff is broken as is the hour hand.  I can't find any information on replacement parts for either, with one exception.  I read on a forum that the more common 992B movement has the same staff as the 999B.  If they are the same, I think that Dave's has it, but he could not confirm if this is the case.  Does anyone know if this is true; or otherwise have a lead for obtaining a new balance staff.

Also, Dave has hands that are similar that are for an Elgin 16s.  Without knowing the diameter of the holes on Dave's hands, does anyone know if they fit my watch (or if you have another source for hands that will fit the Ball).  I looked at esslinger and cas ker but didn't find anything.

Thanks guys.

ham hands.png

ball mvt.png

ball elgin hand.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the easiest way to tell what staff you need is to remove the staff you already have. Then if it's like a 992B staff it should be a friction staff so be careful and don't knock out the blue hub it frictions into.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks guys.  I wondered what the blue hub signified.  I found  a reference and diagram for removing the friction fit balance staff.  Here's the link to the chicago school of watchmaking chapter that discusses it.  http://www.rdrop.com/~jsexton/watches/csw/les15/index.html#:~:text=It is quickly recognizable by,as in figure 15-8.  I was looking forward to using my lathe to cut off the hub, but it looks like this will be easier.

So my plan is to send a picture to Dave to see if the 992B staff matches up.  Does anyone have a diagram of said staff?  Esslinger shows it in stock but it has no diagram.

Enjoy the weekend.

chicago chapter.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a reminder this is watch repair there are lots and lots and lots of variations. Your friction staff is a Waltham friction staff in the image up above requires special parts for your staking set. Hamilton used a different arrangement like the image below. Even though there's a groove showed in the staff the 992B does not have. So you can see the hub on the left staff in the middle and how they would look together. The reason for this particular example in the book was that they were some watches that they had upgraded the friction staff and they put the groups of people with no beyond the blued hub what was going on but on the watches like the 992B they didn't do the

image.png.d15e282d6ffd86490eda74a447c20b97.png

5 hours ago, arron said:

So my plan is to send a picture to Dave to see if the 992B staff matches up.  Does anyone have a diagram of said staff?  Esslinger shows it in stock but it has no diagram.

Dimensions would be better because there are some minor variations.

For instance of the friction staff's there are three of them at least for the 16 size 2 of them are the same for size with the pivot difference in the 992B only comes in one size

image.png.08d1f8d82e85e70bb4cd9388633d85ef.png

So visually though staffs will look identical casually at least.

So here's what your hub looks like with the Hamilton staff. As you see is a lot easier to work with them the Waltham all you have to do is support the blued steel part and gently knock out the friction staff from the other side of course

image.png.e647cddf6f467d2f13faa8bf9d2ebc37.png

In other words on the staking set it will look like this.

image.png.4c5f85e39db47a8dd6f0dd80e7994dd5.png

A picture of the staff

image.png.80f30e10a2381d5e32bdbd7b447392f8.png

A picture of measuring the staff which why would I do such a stupid thing is measured the staff? Because there's only 1992B staff there's no need to measure except there does seem to be some minor variations. I have a suspicion that some aftermarket staffs are not made quite the right dimensions and then they will not friction in the hub there too big or occasionally get one that loose because somebody drove a big staff in when they shouldn't have

image.png.d33632fe8e7deb96c1e00d00410f1db5.png

Here's a picture testing the staff in the balance hole jewel even though there's only one size it's still nice to check before it's in the balance

image.png.3d03ba039650d467c2cb0fb2fcfbf4e3.png

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@JohnR725 that's very helpful.  I appreciate the time you took to give those instructions and post the pictures.  below is a picture of my staff, which looks identical to the ones you posted.  The approx measurements I got are: .772 on the left part of the staff; .715 on the right side of the hub; the hub is 1.107; and the overall length (minus the broken pivot) is 5.248; which seem to line up with the measurements you posted.  I didn't think to measure the pivot, which I'll do if there's enough of one left on the staff.  Thanks again.

IMG_8655.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No John, we don't want Mark to change anything, we are just scared of losing a brilliant forum and losing contact with each other.  As pointed out, this forum is full of knowledge and I for one,  consider the regulars friends. I would hate to lose contact with you and the others.   PS, this forum is really important to me. 
    • one little minor problem with your chemistry experiment here which is what exactly is epilam? In other words is it an exact substance with the chemical you specify or is it a term? For instance originally it was steric acid either dissolved in some sort of solvent or it was applied by vaporizing it. Then now it's all kinds of different things the watch companies all have different ideas there's a whole bunch of patents. So is not always an exact substance.   let me snip out a image from the patent that I attached up above. Notice I highlighted something it seems to disagree with your evaluation.  
    • I guess You had to try, as it would be hard to sleep without that try, but, I know the result before the experiment... As I told before, the friction will be so big that the wheel will not turn. The pivots have to be thin and polished - the bigger the number of the wheel (2th, 3gh, 4th...), the thinner the pivot. What You are trying to do is possible, but forming the new thin pivot must be done on lathe. Thus the wheel will get shorter, but can have new pivot without the drilling for normal standard repivoting. Then piece of brass can be soldered under the pivot hole in the bridge and new hole drilled in it to form the new bearing.  Well, this way is not the recommended one, not quite correct, but it is possible to do for the excersize... When I say lathe, lathe may be verry simple, someting like turns, but made of what one has in reach of his hands. If You want to try, I will try to guide
    • yes by all means let's gather up our weapons tar feathers find the nearest tree in case Mark is not agreeable to our terms on our demands and storm his Castle. I don't quite understand what you're trying to do here? In other words you want Mark to somehow guarantee that the group will live on forever no matter what? You want Mark to somehow change his business model of what is trying to do or should we just take the group away from him? oh and is quite possible that Mark never realized that his discussion group would take on a life of its own. That the members of the group would like to continue on forever.  
    • I'm not sentimental, I see it this way.  I inherit something I  don't like, I could sell it, buy something I do like and remember the person with the new item.  For example, I  inherit a watch ( I haven't), I don't like it, I  buy a watch I do like, every time I look at the watch, I think of the person. 
×
×
  • Create New...