Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Getting back to a pocket watch I've had forever. It had a broken balance pivot, so I decided to try replacing it for the experience.

The actual replacement went off without a hitch. It seems to be a press fit into the balance and not riveted, so I just had to close up the hole in the balance hub a tiny bit with a domed stake to get a tight fit.

The problem now is the roller table slips right over it with no friction.

Because the roller table is so tall, I don't think using domed punches is the way to go, but I've never done this before so I'm looking for advice. What's the right thing to do here?

Removal:

20240402213950269.thumb.jpg.06a3af20f603c00a54366d7856affe05.jpg

Installation:

20240403213505904.thumb.jpg.332886e8b304b54300194a7e040182cb.jpg

Posted

My experience is limited, but even so, I have seen this.  A previous watchmaker tried to solve it by punching the side of the roller table, like tightening a cannon pinion. Bad. I ended up replacing the roller table.

You may have to find another staff that fits.

Somewhere on this forum someone suggested inserting a whisker to fill the gap.

 

Posted (edited)

I can asure You that this is a staff that needs riveting. Closing the hole usually leads to loosing the center. so the balance will probably be good out of true now. As You have nothing to loose, there is a simple way to solve the loose roller problem: use (small qantyty of) superglue or thread fixer.

Edited by nevenbekriev
  • Like 1
Posted

Well, 02 in 3602 means 'no shock protection, small seconds hand'. For sure there is only one balance staff for 3602, so no way to order wrong one, but spare parts from the last years of the production are wid bad quality.

I would advice to true the balance and check how it behaves in the movement without the roller first. To see if the endshake is normal and the balance position against the lever bridge, because in Molnia the distance between the balance and the lever bridge is verry small and if not trued, the balance may rubb.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Thanks for the advice, all. Yeah, I bought these staffs off eBay and I think they shipped from the Ukraine. It was a couple years ago, so my memory is a little hazy.

I do have two, so I'll put a micrometer on them and see if the other is any different.

And yes, that was clearly my mistake on the not riveting. I thought with the step sat flush with the other side and thought there's nothing to rivet, but I was mistaken.

This is why I'm practicing on a cheap eBay find.

Here are a couple close ups of the other replacement staff and the one I just installed.

20240404080651482.thumb.jpg.2c20ae5725234f5293348900cd216931.jpg20240404080906594.thumb.jpg.0c45e333a3f54d61666509203495fcba.jpg

Posted
5 hours ago, ManSkirtBrew said:

micrometer on them and see if the other is any different.

unless you enjoy surprises always best to measure the new and the old staff to see if there any differences.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

unless you enjoy surprises always best to measure the new and the old staff to see if there any differences.

 

That would definitely have been the smart thing to do.

Unfortunately, I'm not always the smartest tool in the shed.

Posted (edited)
On 2/15/2022 at 4:18 PM, nickelsilver said:

I really strongly recommend not using a micrometer to measure balance staff pivots. By the time you can feel that the spindle and anvil are in contact, you have marked the pivot with a couple of tiny flat spots. I know some people say the spring loaded dial type tools like the JKA Feintaster won't mark pivots, but I don't trust that. For stuff under about 0.15mm you really need a jewel gage. I know they are hard to find and expensive, but those little flats will really mess up your timing.

Attention those of us who want to make a micrometer from scratch, don't, 

GET A JEWEL GAGE, 

Harmful to be creative. some of the time.

Edited by Nucejoe
Posted

Got my calipers and made the balance as flat as I could.

IMG_20240408_195003.thumb.jpg.2310ae154669bfaacf1971f4ebca5a86.jpg


So it was time to assemble, and when I pressed the hairspring on, I noticed it was super wonky. There was a pretty hard bend and a bit of a twist near the stud.

At first I thought maybe it was supposed to be there, but after looking at the path of the regulating pins, it seems much more likely that it was bent to begin with, or I bent it taking it apart a few years ago when I was less experienced and even more prone to ruining parts than I am now.

Which is saying a lot.

So out came my #1 and #6 tweezers, my favorite hairspring bending tools. It also needed a little twist and adjustment near the overcoil to get the collet centered, but I'm pretty happy with the results. I know the terminal curve could be more perfect, but I had to call it at some point.

Final assembly soon!

 

Before:

20240409102150941.thumb.jpg.48d9c907d8b8d4305ca74cc517e8b4d0.jpg

20240409103044187.thumb.jpg.b643ef87920509731ac897af8a93893f.jpg

 

During:

20240409103209464.thumb.jpg.1be5d28c0a57f17319c831cd62893e38.jpg

 

After:

20240409104629339.thumb.jpg.9ee1270c5b88bf70eabadd52c0b713d7.jpg

20240409111247314.thumb.jpg.49492b8c54eda2ffb1dda884dab5aa90.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Well, there aren't enough frames to count, but it oscillates for a good 30 seconds or so with a puff of air.

I have to say, for my first balance staff replacement, I'm pretty pleased with these results. I know, show me other positions. Maybe after dinner 🙂

image.thumb.png.9b11bb8573d311c122b03c0f2b4001ee.png\

 

Edit: well I was right about needing to see other positions. The hairspring is definitely hitting something in positions other than dial down--you can hear it when you put it to your ear. The overcoil probably needs more tweaking.

Which I'm not going to do right now. Maybe some time in the future when I'm ready for more hairspring practice 😉

I did close up the minute hand, since it was freewheeling, and get it cased back up.

IMG_20240413_210325.thumb.jpg.a972e778a8f09b10f0438198756952d3.jpgIMG_20240413_210333.thumb.jpg.6a1b4b58d6694b6685f0fa7e274759bc.jpg

Edited by ManSkirtBrew
  • Like 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • One of the problems we would have with a watchmaker's lathe is they were made over considerable span of time and manufacturing in the early days probably wasn't as good as it was today. Then if you look at the older catalogs typically it was just the head a few collets and something to rest graver on. So basically a basic lathe with over time things acquired but acquired things may or may not fit. Order today you purchase a used lathe that all kinds of nifty bits and pieces from a seller that acquired from? This would come back to that the basic watchmaker's lathe was used for basic watchmaking like turning things with a hand graver. Then limited indexing is fine because you can make things like stems Which don't need a whole bunch indexing   In the link above the word vector is mentioned and at the link below you can purchase one. Then of course you're going to need the motor that's a little bit extra for the price. https://www.hswalsh.com/product/lathe-vector-watchmakers-48-collets-hl11. That you're going to need some bonus parts like these found this picture online show the classic way of classic gear cutting.   The lathe could have a much bigger indexing disk but it has to be mounted close to the edge. Otherwise you're going to have a whole bunch of smaller disks like this which I think has notches rather than holes. Then as wonderful as these pictures look actually cutting a gear with this is not entirely fun. Look at all is belts all pulling on things and this is a watchmaker's lathe lightweight with lots of bits and pieces attached. It would make more sense if you actually cut a gear with something like this and it tends to be it's not really the best way to do it looks nice on paper but it is not the best way to go. Reality for cutting watch parts would be a bigger machine is much better. Than getting rid of all those belts and pulleys also good. Here is an interesting channel I would've liked of found a different video but this was nice and short if you look at his video as he uses a stepping motor and worm gear assembly for the indexing plate. In this particular video it gets attached to the lathe at about one minute and seven seconds and it looks like it's hiding looks like he has a Sherline. I do know he's had other stuff you'll just have to go through his videos to find it. Then at about one minute and 22 seconds you find out if you set up things appropriately. It's always bad we end up with half a tooth at the very end. Then you will note big lathe yes he's getting a big gear but you could easily cut a watch gear with the setup. And it definitely way more stable than a watchmaker's lathe.         Oh here's a company they been in business since 1911 http://www.fwderbyshireinc.com/  
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • Hello, looking forward to participating on the forum here! I will mostly be listening and asking questions since I am an amateur hobbyist. I have most of the beginner hand tools and a Timegrapher. The extent of my tinkering consists of a successful Seiko 7S26 to NH36 movement swap inside an all original 1997 SKX007, along with a bunch of battery changes for friends and family. I have yet to tackle full disassembly and cleaning. Right now, I don't really have the budget or time to invest in a cleaning setup (even manual cleaning), but hopefully soon! I joined because I recently purchased a mechanical Timex Camper from 1994, and my searches for information regarding servicing and swapping out these Timex mechanical movements consistently led me to Watch Repair Talk. There is also a wealth of knowledge here about dial design, another area of interest for me. My other hobbies includes leather working (mostly small pieces, shoes eventually), crochet, sewing (would love to make clothing), design (especially type design), home espresso, cocktails, and tennis. I want to buy a film camera, but I don't need yet another expensive hobby involving last-century technology. Yes, I have ADHD.
    • HWGIKE#60 Accurist ETA 2390 Swiss lever, 21 jewels, full service A slim Accurist with a nice movement, eventless service, nice performance.  
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England  
×
×
  • Create New...