Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, JeremyLaurenson said:

My date wheel keeps popping up and for the life of me I cant figure out what I am doing wrong...

Here's a set of pics taken in order. A tooth or two have to be under the jumper spring plate at all times to stop the date wheel from being able to come up. If that is not the case, then I can only assume it is not the correct wheel or jumper spring plate. 

If the plate is covering at least one tooth during the date change, then this problem couldn't happen

 

1.thumb.jpg.83d382782cc1bb0da103f38710264cbd.jpg

2.thumb.jpg.e78864bea8a4696eb58d9d02d81d4077.jpg

3.thumb.jpg.15c513adfa3ede739c171066382ae088.jpg

4.thumb.jpg.b56004ffac70840fe34aa4e079b248e5.jpg

Edited by Jon
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I pulled up a video from when I serviced a 2836-2 and I don't see anything different in your video vs. mine. I slowed my video way down in VLC and paused and took a screenshot while the date wheel is advancing and in the image it looks like there is an instant where the Date Jumper Retaining Plate is NOT covering any of the Date Wheel teeth, or at least not that I can see.

One thing that does looks slightly off is that right before you start to change the date, the Skipping Double (spring) is sitting between the teeth, where it's supposed to be, but the date shown right next to the Stem is not centered over the stem. Are you sure this is the correct Date Wheel? Did the quickset function work prior to servicing?


2836.thumb.jpg.651c8b7fcadaa401251a2626de70c76b.jpg

 

 

2836-(b).thumb.jpg.41a4693779e28f352f03ab0c3e5d1b45.jpg

Edited by GuyMontag
  • Like 1
Posted

I just put one of these back together last week, and the date jumper maintaining plate no.5295 is exactly the same shape as yours, so you have the right part fitted. There is indeed that intermediate position where the teeth can slip through the plate as is happening in your video. I might have been a bit hasty with my post above, though. It does seem strange to rely on the day-disc to hold the date wheel down. I assembled both then tested them together, so I can't be sure. I still have the watch on test, so if I get chance in the next few days I'll remove the dial and day disc, and see what happens.

Posted (edited)
47 minutes ago, Klassiker said:

I just put one of these back together last week, and the date jumper maintaining plate no.5295 is exactly the same shape as yours, so you have the right part fitted. There is indeed that intermediate position where the teeth can slip through the plate as is happening in your video. I might have been a bit hasty with my post above, though. It does seem strange to rely on the day-disc to hold the date wheel down. I assembled both then tested them together, so I can't be sure. I still have the watch on test, so if I get chance in the next few days I'll remove the dial and day disc, and see what happens.

The day disk doesn't need to be present to keep the date wheel in place. I think it's common practice to lubricate the teeth of the date wheel by applying your oil to the skipping double spring and then advancing the date to transfer the oil to the date wheel teeth, repeating as you go.

Edited by GuyMontag
  • Like 1
Posted

MHH_0078.thumb.jpg.ffd732ae15dd3ad6926689be80a0d227.jpg

This is a 2836 that I have just pulled from my projects box and as with the example above from @GuyMontag there is a moment during the date change when the teeth line up perfectly with apertures in the retaining plate, however, the point at which the jumper spring starts to flick the wheel into place is just before the point of alignment (for want of a better description) and so the wheel powers through the alignment without dislodging. I had to hold the date wheel in this position to take the photograph.

What is interesting here is that we seem to have a variety of different shapes of retaining plate, and the one shown by @Jon doesn't have the cut outs that align with the teeth at all, so with his example it is impossible for the wheel to jump out.

It may be that something is lifting the date wheel on @JeremyLaurenson's watch such that the teeth are being pushed up against the underside of the retaining plate just enough that as the teeth align with the cut outs they are pushed through.

I'm guessing that the date wheel is for a 6 o'clock date window rather than a 3 o'clock window, hence the orientation of the numbers and the misalignment at the stem (the alignment of the 13 is correct for a 6 o'clock window). Is this the original date wheel for this movement? Are the date wheel teeth all in good condition and are any of them bent either up or down compared to the others.

Is the retaining plate original to this movement and this date wheel?

Is it possible that the date jumper spring has a slight twist in it such that it imparts just enough upwards force to the date wheel as it turns that it causes the problem? If it is twisted away from normal such that the bottom edge of the jumper is closer to the date wheel than the top edge it will impart an upwards movement as the wheel turns.

 

  • Like 2
Posted
17 hours ago, Marc said:

What is interesting here is that we seem to have a variety of different shapes of retaining plate, and the one shown by @Jon doesn't have the cut outs that align with the teeth at all, so with his example it is impossible for the wheel to jump out.

I used a generic quartz ETA movement that I photographed, so the plate wouldn't be the same as this movement, so my bad. I would have thought that the design of all jumper spring plates wouldn't allow the calendar wheel to jump through the gaps, but obviously I was wrong. Seems like a foolish design because if this movement had the same design plate as the one I photographed there wouldn't be a problem.

 

17 hours ago, Marc said:

It may be that something is lifting the date wheel on @JeremyLaurenson's watch such that the teeth are being pushed up against the underside of the retaining plate just enough that as the teeth align with the cut outs they are pushed through.

 

17 hours ago, Marc said:

Is it possible that the date jumper spring has a slight twist in it such that it imparts just enough upwards force to the date wheel as it turns that it causes the problem?

What @Marchas said seems very possible, plausible and probable. Something is pushing the wheel upwards and I can't think of anything other than these suggestions. Is the date driving wheel seated properly? Does the same thing happen when not in quickset, but when you turn the motion work?

Posted

When the day disc is in place, it kicks it up anyway.

So, the actual issue was that the Unlocking yoke maintaining plate was not installed right and was not holding down the date indicator driving wheel.

Its back together and working, but now my winding stem no work right, so ill be "practicing" some more 😉

image.png.02307efc329225b5cee2352858bd071d.png

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • After cleaning up the pivots, I made bushes on the lathe. At this point I've pressed in 6 bushes (3 sets) and the wheels turn smooth. What I can also tell you, is that I'm not looking forward to final assembly. Getting the pivots aligned seems to get exponentially more difficult with each wheel that is added.
    • Islands are interesting places to live depending upon their size and other factors. This is a bigger island and it has a bridge to get there at least on one end. It's also big enough that you don't have to go someplace else to get things typically. It can be a problem if you get a job in Seattle though. Yes I've known of people who commuted from the island to Seattle for a job and I don't quite remember how many hours it took but it took a long time. So basically islands are nice if you don't have to leave very often.
    • Thanks @JohnR725! Everything you say makes a lot of sense and is encouraging to read.
    • isn't it nice to have a decent case open or when the case doesn't want to be opened? In the case of a Rolex watch that supposed to pass specific water resistant testing you probably do need to tighten the back down. But they shouldn't be tightened so much that they risk stripping the threads out. Then the other problem that comes up is the gaskets can start to disintegrate and then getting the back off can be quite a challenge unless you have a really good tool and perhaps some penetrating oil to loosen things up. Yes really nice case marking. When I was in school we were taught to mark the cases and  the American watch and clockmakers Institute even had a? So if you joined at one time they would give you an identification number. They were explaining or giving an example of if the watches ever found in you have a unique number they can perhaps figure out the history of the watch or identify the body it's attached to for instance not that that probably comes up that often. So you got a unique number and even made a special metal stamp that you can purchase. It wasn't a super big aggressive stamp but still it left a mark in the back of the case. Then I heard from people at work on Rolex watches they were using a felt pen indelible but later on they decided that was bad because apparently the ink could release  chemicals although it seems like once it's dry that shouldn't be an issue. Then of course today was nice is you can keep computer records sealed have to mark anything at all I personally find it's best to leave no reference behind that you were even there. Especially when you have a beautiful watch that has no markings at all and now it has your scribbling all over it not good typically if there is a typical and watch repair?  a lot of minor repairs you don't need to do a complete servicing. But beyond a certain point you're going to have to take apart a lot of stuff you're going to disrupt the lubrication even if it looks perfect right now and yes you might as well just go ahead the service the whole thing. also in a watch like this where a lot of things seem to be going on the complete service would be better then you'll know exactly where you stand versus dealing with unknown mysteries for prior repair.
    • That Island looks pretty good on the pics I found. Must be nice to live there. Welcome! Are there many watchmakers over there?
×
×
  • Create New...