Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hey watch peeps,  hope we are all well. Its not often i ask but i need some help or just thoughts really what to do here. I have ideas but someone might come up with something that works better. So the Timex belonged to my sister's husband who passed away last year. She bought him this when he started his career as a prison officer over 40 years ago and he wore it every day for work until it no longer ran. So obviously it has extreme sentimental value, the plan was for me to get it running again so she can pass it down to her daughter who was born around the same time that her father started his job. Taking the back off, I've run into a problem, corrosive damage from the battery that has been in there for years. The circuit board might be too far gone and the + battery tab is missing broken off, but I'm attempting to clean it up using a carbon stick and a small paintbrush to apply contact cleaner. Struggling to identify the movement which dates to 1979 presents the problem of finding a donor, there is a number of 880 on the inside of the case which might relate. Any advice on cleaning up and tab repair  would be greatly appreciated, i dont want to remove the circuit board unless absolutely necessary as its soldered to the coil which is very different to ones I've come across before and has a huge magnet sat on top of it.

20240128_141925.jpg

20240128_141859.jpg

20240128_141844.jpg

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
Posted

here is the watch in 1979 catalog .   It been awhile since I worked on that movement but recall not having much luck once corrosion has done damage.

your best bet maybe to find a donor watch.   

 

image.thumb.png.6e34d4df1ad6a015d1fc4c35d0bed8b7.png

ok, now its not me bugged that I don't remember the movement number.   Will do some cobweb clearing!

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, JerseyMo said:

here is the watch in 1979 catalog .   It been awhile since I worked on that movement but recall not having much luck once corrosion has done damage.

your best bet maybe to find a donor watch.   

 

 

ok, now its not me bugged that I don't remember the movement number.   Will do some cobweb clearing!

 

Thanks Mo i did find some reference to 800 series but they were electronic with  balance wheel. The coil shape is unusal to me, circular instead of cylinder with a big magnet stuck on a bridge slapped on top of it which i removed and then had real fun getting it back on. Cleaned up the circuit and supplied some power and the rotor is twitching like crazy . Both battery terminals were broken off so not sure what do yet. The model is 57319 and the dial says Taiwan . I might have found a donor , but not working, the code on the chip is different though.

Posted

M43 is the movement type

1 minute ago, JerseyMo said:

M43 is the movement type

hmm - or maybe m55.  ah come on Mo clear you brain

ok, it has the calendar that makes a difference.  it is M56

 

found one for ya

image.thumb.png.62b349f35e7438b68b103f62d7d87836.png

  • Thanks 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, JerseyMo said:

M43 is the movement type

hmm - or maybe m55.  ah come on Mo clear you brain

ok, it has the calendar that makes a difference.  it is M56

 

found one for ya

image.thumb.png.62b349f35e7438b68b103f62d7d87836.png

It looks very different Mo, could it be an alternative model ?

Posted
12 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

It looks very different Mo, could it be an alternative model ?

 

41 minutes ago, JerseyMo said:

M43 is the movement type

hmm - or maybe m55.  ah come on Mo clear you brain

ok, it has the calendar that makes a difference.  it is M56

 

found one for ya

image.thumb.png.62b349f35e7438b68b103f62d7d87836.png

No i think thats the right one m43

11 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

Hi @Neverenoughwatches  I think it’s an m43.   You may be able to get more info on. Heritage 1854 web site . They seem exclusively Timex. Have a shifty.   As far as I know there is no manual   And it was made in Taiwan.

Looks right thanks WW

Thanks Mo and WW, this gives me something to work with now. Its alive but very jittery. 

52 minutes ago, JerseyMo said:

M43 is the movement type

hmm - or maybe m55.  ah come on Mo clear you brain

ok, it has the calendar that makes a difference.  it is M56

 

found one for ya

image.thumb.png.62b349f35e7438b68b103f62d7d87836.png

Thanks mo I'm amazed there are unused movements the m43 and m56 look identical .

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
19 hours ago, CYCLOPS said:

its the one, no second hand either, put your calendar on it and done, now you will need a stem and crown....

It is that one but I'm in the uk, only non working ones here. The one in the watch needs a lot of repair, both battery terminals were snapped off. There is some movement from the rotor which is just a switch to move the minute hand once with each activation of it. Its very inconsistent when I supply power, i think I've traced it to the coil, very high resistance reading. Its looking like i need a donor movement. 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this post MikePilk, I just came across a similar problem with an Omega 1022.  The problem I had was the seconds pinion spring was bent out of shape and did not even engage with the wheel properly, so the seconds hand was not moving at all. (no power loss though :) I removed the automatic module so I could access the spring and work on it. Once I bent it back close to the right shape, I experienced the same problem you reported about power loss.  Many tweaks later, and the seconds hand is moving properly again, with amplitude back to good numbers again. Cheers
    • After cleaning up the pivots, I made bushes on the lathe. At this point I've pressed in 6 bushes (3 sets) and the wheels turn smooth. What I can also tell you, is that I'm not looking forward to final assembly. Getting the pivots aligned seems to get exponentially more difficult with each wheel that is added.
    • Islands are interesting places to live depending upon their size and other factors. This is a bigger island and it has a bridge to get there at least on one end. It's also big enough that you don't have to go someplace else to get things typically. It can be a problem if you get a job in Seattle though. Yes I've known of people who commuted from the island to Seattle for a job and I don't quite remember how many hours it took but it took a long time. So basically islands are nice if you don't have to leave very often.
    • Thanks @JohnR725! Everything you say makes a lot of sense and is encouraging to read.
    • isn't it nice to have a decent case open or when the case doesn't want to be opened? In the case of a Rolex watch that supposed to pass specific water resistant testing you probably do need to tighten the back down. But they shouldn't be tightened so much that they risk stripping the threads out. Then the other problem that comes up is the gaskets can start to disintegrate and then getting the back off can be quite a challenge unless you have a really good tool and perhaps some penetrating oil to loosen things up. Yes really nice case marking. When I was in school we were taught to mark the cases and  the American watch and clockmakers Institute even had a? So if you joined at one time they would give you an identification number. They were explaining or giving an example of if the watches ever found in you have a unique number they can perhaps figure out the history of the watch or identify the body it's attached to for instance not that that probably comes up that often. So you got a unique number and even made a special metal stamp that you can purchase. It wasn't a super big aggressive stamp but still it left a mark in the back of the case. Then I heard from people at work on Rolex watches they were using a felt pen indelible but later on they decided that was bad because apparently the ink could release  chemicals although it seems like once it's dry that shouldn't be an issue. Then of course today was nice is you can keep computer records sealed have to mark anything at all I personally find it's best to leave no reference behind that you were even there. Especially when you have a beautiful watch that has no markings at all and now it has your scribbling all over it not good typically if there is a typical and watch repair?  a lot of minor repairs you don't need to do a complete servicing. But beyond a certain point you're going to have to take apart a lot of stuff you're going to disrupt the lubrication even if it looks perfect right now and yes you might as well just go ahead the service the whole thing. also in a watch like this where a lot of things seem to be going on the complete service would be better then you'll know exactly where you stand versus dealing with unknown mysteries for prior repair.
×
×
  • Create New...