Jump to content

Accutron 2210


Recommended Posts

Although I was trying to be good and not purchase anything till I had sorted out the multitude of watches I have in the queue, I saw this Accutron on the bay and bought it for £32.49 plus about $5 postage to my sons place in LA.

 

post-197-0-81818600-1442312171_thumb.jpg

 

post-197-0-07744900-1442312198_thumb.jpg

 

post-197-0-58803200-1442312234_thumb.jpg

 

post-197-0-44651800-1442312305_thumb.jpg

 

I had not got an Accutron 2210 up to this point in time, and to be honest the movement does not have a particularly good rep for reliability.  However, the parts are comparitively cheap compared to the 214 and 218 and through a quirk of fate I have quite a few NOS 2210 parts that were amongst a job lot of 214 and 218 bits I bought some time ago.

 

It is a 1973 movement and coincidentally that is when these were first produced and the movement is quite small, being used in lots of ladies watches which do not command the same prices as the mens accutrons - good for getting parts.  I queried with the vendor the size and was advised it is 34mm excluding the crown so it is in a mans case.

 

Condition was described as "Awesome" but I will settle for reasonably good seeing it is over 40 years old, there are some scratches on the glass and I deduce from the back that the case is gold plated which is difficult to tell from the photos, but I will take what comes.

 

It will be a while until it is sent over to me along with some 218 coils I took a punt on but I look forward to seeing it.

 

Was not going to buy any more repair jobs but I weakened, however, I am definitely back on the wagon for a while.

 

Cheers,

 

Vic

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Got the watch and the condition is indeed good. It's a nice steel case.

Took out the battery and it is dead so I have sent off for a couple of Renatas. I have a compatible one but it is off one of those sheets of batteries you get for a pound and I resisted the urge to try it out. Hopefully in a couple of days time the new ones will be here and who knows.

Cheers,

Vic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And some you win !

The engine room is fully functional George with a new battery inserted and would you believe the pointers are moving as well.

There is a slight blemish to the left of the tuning fork insignia but I have decided to leave it alone for now and just check the accuracy is ok. The Vendor has put a new brown seiko calfskin strap on it which, though not quite right for the SS watch will also do for now.

So I have a fully functional Accutron 2210 - total cost £38.00 which will do for me - question is - will I ever sell it on (wife laughs in the background) - OK probably not.

Cheers,

Vic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just an addendum.  On the original photo above it looks like there are black dots on the pointers, in fact there are no black dots anywhere, it must have been mucky when they took the photo - bonus.

Could one of the inimitable moderators put an "i" in pointers above - a small thing I know but it irritates me :cool:

 

Cheers,

 

Vic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could one of the inimitable moderators put an "i" in pointers above - a small thing I know but it irritates me

Done!

question is - will I ever sell it on (wife laughs in the background) - OK probably not.

If your like me, probably not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
    • Maybe I'm over simplifying this and I'm a little late to the discussion, but just by my looking at oil when I use it on a treated cap jewel  the oil stays in one nice bubble, but when I don't it spreads out to the edges of the jewel. I'm not sure (but could well be wrong) but the analogy of a waxed car and rain is accurate in this case, the wax is very hydrophobic and repels the water, however, the process epilame works by is a different physical process based upon cohesion/adhesion (oleophilic) not repulsion (oleophobic)  at least as far as I have read/observed. If one were to use a oleophobic substance equivalent to wax (hydrophobic) then one would need to create a donut shape to fence in the oil, however if one used such a strategy with a epilame which is oleophilic then the oil would sit on the ring of the donut and not in the 'donut hole', exactly where you don't want it. Even if the oil is smeared then the oleophilic epilame should pull it back to the center (see diagram below). Reference For interest the chemical in epilame is 2-(PERFLUOROHEXYL) ETHYL METHACRYLATE, CAS NO: 2144-53-8
×
×
  • Create New...