Jump to content

How is your microscope set up on your bench?


Recommended Posts

I recently bought a used Amscope microscope on a boom.  It came with a .5mm barlow lens so the working distance between the lens and the top or the table 6-8" which is great.  I wasn't planning on this purchase but it was a great deal that I couldn't pass up.  Once I got the scope home, I put it on my work bench but I have an issue now.  My chair doesn't go high enough for me to reach the lenses on the scope.  My bench is set at about 95cm high and I usually have my chair set to its lowest setting (I'm 6'2" tall).  It's something I did not take into consideration so now I am curious how others set up their scope.  Do you have another bench that is lower just for when you use the scope?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the same setup, Amscope with 0.5x Barlow. Due to lack of space, I have to use my computer desk. The desk top is 76.5cm (30") and the eyepieces about 43.5cm (17") about that. I use a standard adjustable office chair. With it fully up I'm at just the right height for the microscope (I'm only 5'8"). 

Your bench is too high - a saw will soon solve your problem 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have an adjustable stool [nothing to do with constipation remedies...] which allows me to drop down to below the level of my bench for loupe work and then to sit up to the level of my microscope eyepieces.  My bench is set at 96cm and my stool at its highest setting is 72cm and at its lowest, is at 54cm.  My scope is a binocular boom model with 10x magnification and a 1x barlow.  I'm 5' 10"...

Edited by specks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm only 5'5". I'm guessing you (op) must have a proper watchmaking bench, because I do NOT have that problem unless I have a 0.3X Barlow on! I have my regular desk (a standard height roll top) and a work table (a standard height dining table). They seem to be about the same height, and I have a standard issue desk chair at standard working height. The scope sits on the table for space reasons, and I just swivel the chair back and forth between them. I certainly sit up straight when I'm working through the scope, but like, in a good posture sort of way more than anything...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/25/2024 at 11:08 AM, Malocchio said:

Have you tilted the microscope? Some tilt is needed to keep your hand out of the way while using a screwdriver. Tilting brings down the oculars.

I did not do this at first but after trying this it did help.  Still not ideal as now I am looking at the work piece on a slight angle.  I need to practice working through the microscope and get use to the depth perception.  Thanks for the tip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a couple of different ways to use a microscope in conjunction with my workbench.

I always say "Move the work to suit you, don't contort yourself to suit the work." So for me keeping myself comfortable when working on watches is a must and I don't like to change the height of my chair to suit the work. But I understand that we don't all have this luxury. The first photo is my height adjustable watchmakers bench next to my microscope bench, so they are on two different levels. The bench the microscope is on is also height adjustable. I don't like to tilt my microscope for personal reasons. It just suits me that way, as I like to have everything in focus, especially when filming and projecting the work onto a projector screen for the class to see.

Myworkbenches.thumb.jpg.1f8583979ea56bdf9ef5cbc2bdd1dcfd.jpg

 

The next photo is of a couple of students workbenches that are also motor driven height adjustable. the one in the foreground is set to a working height and the one in the background is lower to use the microscope on an articulating arm.

Studentsworkbenches.thumb.jpg.c0b88304e53791e166c45c4a30ca8e73.jpg

These workbenches can be made for about £300 to £350 with waxed solid beech worktops, which I think is a good investment, especially as you no longer need to adjust your chair to suit the work, as well as feeling like a total boss when servicing your watches. Think about how much money we have spent on tools, watches and equipment. We owe it to ourselves to build a decent workbench as a priority.

My next project is to profile the front of these workbenches using a plunge router and fit leather armrests as I have on mine. The students won't know what's hit them! I'll post some pics later in the year when I've made them.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/25/2024 at 4:35 PM, specks said:

I have an adjustable stool [nothing to do with constipation remedies...]

Those can be a real pain in the arse.

2 hours ago, Jon said:

I have a couple of different ways to use a microscope in conjunction with my workbench.

I always say "Move the work to suit you, don't contort yourself to suit the work." So for me keeping myself comfortable when working on watches is a must and I don't like to change the height of my chair to suit the work. But I understand that we don't all have this luxury. The first photo is my height adjustable watchmakers bench next to my microscope bench, so they are on two different levels. The bench the microscope is on is also height adjustable. I don't like to tilt my microscope for personal reasons. It just suits me that way, as I like to have everything in focus, especially when filming and projecting the work onto a projector screen for the class to see.

Myworkbenches.thumb.jpg.1f8583979ea56bdf9ef5cbc2bdd1dcfd.jpg

 

The next photo is of a couple of students workbenches that are also motor driven height adjustable. the one in the foreground is set to a working height and the one in the background is lower to use the microscope on an articulating arm.

Studentsworkbenches.thumb.jpg.c0b88304e53791e166c45c4a30ca8e73.jpg

These workbenches can be made for about £300 to £350 with waxed solid beech worktops, which I think is a good investment, especially as you no longer need to adjust your chair to suit the work, as well as feeling like a total boss when servicing your watches. Think about how much money we have spent on tools, watches and equipment. We owe it to ourselves to build a decent workbench as a priority.

My next project is to profile the front of these workbenches using a plunge router and fit leather armrests as I have on mine. The students won't know what's hit them! I'll post some pics later in the year when I've made them.

Do these sloped armrests really make a difference in comfort ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Do these sloped armrests really make a difference in comfort ?

I like them and I find the position of my arms a little more comfortable but they don't make you a better watchmaker! Here's a photo of Roger Smith's workbench with not a pad in sight and look at the stuff he knocks out.

RogerSmithbench.jpg.d8448a8a3e1c70287598fd3da6a5827f.jpg

And here are the Struthers' workbenches. George Daniels never used armrests either.

 

Struthers.jpg.6fa6dd0ca89a06bc9c1e7617d00afd35.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Jon said:

I like them and I find the position of my arms a little more comfortable but they don't make you a better watchmaker! Here's a photo of Roger Smith's workbench with not a pad in sight and look at the stuff he knocks out.

RogerSmithbench.jpg.d8448a8a3e1c70287598fd3da6a5827f.jpg

And here are the Struthers' workbenches. George Daniels never used armrests either.

 

Struthers.jpg.6fa6dd0ca89a06bc9c1e7617d00afd35.jpg

I zoomed straight to the broken stem glass, i love tradition. 

40 minutes ago, Jon said:

I like them and I find the position of my arms a little more comfortable but they don't make you a better watchmaker! Here's a photo of Roger Smith's workbench with not a pad in sight and look at the stuff he knocks out.

RogerSmithbench.jpg.d8448a8a3e1c70287598fd3da6a5827f.jpg

And here are the Struthers' workbenches. George Daniels never used armrests either.

 

Struthers.jpg.6fa6dd0ca89a06bc9c1e7617d00afd35.jpg

Took these pictures from George's book.

20231230_135553.jpg

20231230_135439.jpg

20231230_135609.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Computer Arm Rest For Desk Ergonomic Wrist Rest Support For Keyboard Armrest Extender Rotating Mouse Pad Holder Adjustable
https://a.aliexpress.com/_m0xy6Iw

I have been using these for about five years and they are a great help. The shoulders are less tense and my hands are more stable. Looking a bit tired now. Probably time to reupholster them.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, barrel size.  A 11mm spring will push out into a 11mm barrel, no need to go 0.5mm smaller. 
    • Hello All, I’m looking for advice about how to interpret the mainspring specs described in the GR documents and in the catalogues of online sellers such as cousins.  My problem relates to interpreting the value describing barrel size - I’m unsure what the last number REALLY refers to.   For example: 1.10x.0105x360x11  (This refers to GR2628-X) Does the “ 11 “ here refer to the barrel inside diameter of the calibre OR to the diameter of the wound mainspring before insertion? For example if my measured barrel inside diameter to 11mm, I would normally select a wound spring size a little smaller, say 10.5, wouldn’t I?  Or, does the barrel diameter described in the catalogue specifications take that into account and I would therefore order a catalogue size 11 for an 11mm barrel ID? Hope this makes sense. I can’t find clarification of this anywhere. Many thanks for any enlightenment. Cheers, John
    • Let's say, like in a watch, you have  a 70 tooth 4th wheel, which needs to make a turn in one minute, with an 18,000 beat escapement. 15 tooth escape wheel as usual, and a 7 tooth pinion on it.   70 x 15 x 2 /  = 300  That's 300 beats, and there are 5 beats per second, so divide and you get 60s, one minute- all is well. If we do 70 x 15 x 2 / 8 that equals 262.5. With an 18K balance, which will let the escape wheel move one turn in 6 seconds, the 4th wheel will have made like 1.14 turns. So the time display is running fast. But this comes to like 7.5 seconds over per minute, which is about double your gain (maybe I'm wrong- I'm mathing on my phone while writing on my phone 😄) but pretty sure the gain is more than you are observing.   A possible culprit is that crown/4th wheel isn't running true, and a tooth is slipping past a pinion leaf once per revolution. I've seen this. If the platform is original and it's a nice piece they are often pinned, so the depthing isn't an issue. If the platform isn't pinned, check the depthing. And at any rate check the crown wheel between centeres and make sure the teeth are running true.
    • Fast responses - thank you. Yes, I mentioned the 18000bph to illustrate that it's not a matter of touching coils, over banking, shortened hairspring etc. I even took off the platform and temporarily fitted a another NOS one also with 8 leaves and beating 18000 but the colossal gain is the same. I'm resigned to buying and fitting a new Gorge platform plus a 7 leaf pinion escape wheel but only if I think it will work; otherwise it's a waste of £200 and a couple of hours work. Hence the underlying question is: all other things being equal, what would the timekeeping effect be? Is it a simple 7/8ths as fast? Logic tells me it is but can it be that linear?
    • Sorry to jump in here guys, but I've read through this whole thread and it seems there are a lot of people who think joining Facebook means everyone will have access to their lives. You could make a Facebook account with a fake name. You could even use your real name if you wanted to and set it to completely private so people can't even find you in a search and you don't have to add anyone as a 'friend', so you won't see anyone's posts. Literally use it to join a group full of members of this site. Admins could even set the group to private and require a password of some sort to gain acceptance into the group, so you can be sure that it's only members of this site that get in. @tomh207 is right, the form with email addresses and names is a bad idea. That will be abused by scrapers. Facebook is only as personal as you let it be. You can be completely anonymous on there if you wish. Don't think of it as Facebook. Just think of it as a watch repair group as that's all you'd use the account for. It doesn't even have to be set up with your current email address. Make a random one on Gmail or any other free provider just for the Facebook account. Tagged you by accident and now it won't let me remove it 😂 @Neverenoughwatches
×
×
  • Create New...