Jump to content

Electronics Gurus Advice Needed Please


Recommended Posts

I'd order online (with free delivery) from http://uk.farnell.com/

 

Panasonic FC series would be what I would go for as a reasonably priced but better quality replacement. Just make sure the voltage rating is the same or higher.

 

Fortunately the board looks to be single sided so removing them is easy. Just heat one lead at a time with a soldering iron while gently pulling the capacitor away from the board (you can rock them slightly while doing this as it can help as sometimes they are glued down). Alternate the soldering iron between the leads while pulling and it should gradually lift away and eventually off the board. Don't pull too hard or heat one lead for too long as this can damage the board. If there's any solder left on the pads you can use solder wick to remove it. Then solder in the replacement part.

 

For the 470uF 25V capacitor (I can't see the value of the other one) Farnell have two possible replacements:

http://uk.farnell.com/panasonic-electronic-components/eeufc1e471l/cap-alu-elec-470uf-25v-rad/dp/1855169

http://uk.farnell.com/panasonic-electronic-components/eeufc1e471/cap-alu-elec-470uf-25v-rad/dp/9692169

 

The difference is the lead spacing. It's best if you measure the space between the leads of the existing part and choose the closest match. If they are slightly different then can be bent to fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was in one of their stores the other day. Nothing on the shelves and their paper catalogue didn't seem to list some of the higher value ones I need.

I'll check their site in case it lists more.

Thanks.

At their Lakeside store (Essex) there is a counter with a  good stock and a guy who helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd order online (with free delivery) from http://uk.farnell.com/

Panasonic FC series would be what I would go for as a reasonably priced but better quality replacement. Just make sure the voltage rating is the same or higher.

Fortunately the board looks to be single sided so removing them is easy. Just heat one lead at a time with a soldering iron while gently pulling the capacitor away from the board (you can rock them slightly while doing this as it can help as sometimes they are glued down). Alternate the soldering iron between the leads while pulling and it should gradually lift away and eventually off the board. Don't pull too hard or heat one lead for too long as this can damage the board. If there's any solder left on the pads you can use solder wick to remove it. Then solder in the replacement part.

For the 470uF 25V capacitor (I can't see the value of the other one) Farnell have two possible replacements:

http://uk.farnell.com/panasonic-electronic-components/eeufc1e471l/cap-alu-elec-470uf-25v-rad/dp/1855169

http://uk.farnell.com/panasonic-electronic-components/eeufc1e471/cap-alu-elec-470uf-25v-rad/dp/9692169

The difference is the lead spacing. It's best if you measure the space between the leads of the existing part and choose the closest match. If they are slightly different then can be bent to fit.

Thanks.

I'll note down the others and search.

Some are 1000 others are 2200.

Does it matter if I get a higher voltage?

Ie instead of 10v --》12v?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At their Lakeside store (Essex) there is a counter with a good stock and a guy who helps.

Sounds like its miles better than my local one as well as being miles from me [emoji16]

My one just grunted and pointed to the catalogue saying "try there" when asking what they stocked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does it matter if I get a higher voltage?

Ie instead of 10v --》12v?

 

It certainly doesn't matter going from say a 10V rated part to a 16V rated part which is one level up. There's no benefit from going with a higher voltage rating you just can't go lower. I would also avoid going too much higher (100V etc.) because the chemistry inside and hence the electrical properties can start to vary. I suspect you should be able to find the parts you need with the same or slightly higher rating fairly easily.

 

The electrolytic capacitors in LCD TV's, computers, etc. are typically the low ESR (equivalent series resistance) type. The Panasonic FC series I recommended are low ESR (there are many others it's just that Panasonic FC is as common as dirt). The ones from Maplin may or may not be low ESR and it's best to check as standard ESR parts may not work at all or could fail very quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No problem.

 

Just be sure to be safe as there can be some nasty voltages around the power supply. It also goes without saying that electrolytic capacitors are polarised and so the negative stripe on the new caps have to go the same way as the ones that were removed. It's a good idea to take photos and double check because even when the polarity is marked on the board you can't always trust those markings to be correct. I know this from replacing 53 caps in a stereo amplifier a few months ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've taken some but will draw out on graph paper the values and polarity etc. [emoji106]

I'm very wary when working on electronics ever since I picked up an uncased radio without noticing some eejut had plugged it back in. Shot me back 7ft [emoji35] and gave me a numb arm for a few days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest it's worth replacing them all while you have the thing apart. The component cost isn't particularly high, they don't always show physical signs of failure and it looks like the originals aren't good quality brands in this case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[emoji35] Fitted the 470uf 25v one then my portable gas fired soldering iron ran out of gas! Can't find my electric one I used to repair vacuum ckeaner motor last month.

Curiosity got the better of me so I tried it anyway.

No difference. Sound and backlight but no picture [emoji20].

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the app is misinterpreted the noise because of the extra case construction    Tom
    • I have just picked up a vintage soviet Zarja watch and I have been inspecting it prior to putting it on the 'to be serviced' pile. When I measured it with the timegrapher app, I found it was gaining loads of time. Taking the case back off, I find it's a tiny movement within a relatively large watch and it has a separate steel cover over the movement which presumably holds it in place against the caseback.   Checking the app again without the cover, I find it is actually running reasonably well for an untouched old watch. Putting the cover and the caseback back in place and it reads as massively gaining time again. This behaviour is consistent every time I take the cover on and off. I have checked the balance cock is fixed and the screw is tight, so I assume that the cover and case back are pinching the movement in some way and making it run fast. Not sure I can see how that works because if the cover is touching the balance, surely it would make it stop not run faster? It can't be touching just the hairspring to make it effectively shorter.  Placing only the cover in place or placing just the caseback in place (not even snapping it shut) both cause the fast running. Pretty sure there are a couple of millimetres clearance between the case back and the movement when the cover isn't there. I have also checked the watch, cover and case back for magnetism with another phone app but none of them seem to have an appreciable magnetic field. Perhaps I need to preemptively demagnetise and get a real compass to check them with.  I appreciate that this is just an app using the built in microphone on my phone - could it be misreading a ringing / reverberation of this cover to give the wrong result? Observing the watch just running on the bench closed up, it does seem to be appreciably gaining time. I will wind it, set the time and leave it running overnight and see how it does with no cover / back in place. Perhaps I will also see how it performs on the wrist to rule out misreading by the app    What am I missing here?
    • OK, sometimes it really happens without problems at all. You can take a covex oilve 120/12 stone from Molnija 3602.
    • No, the watch at the picture has nothing to do, it was just close and waiting for repair. It is french verge 1/4 repeater from about 1800. The escape wheel is from IWC cal 1.917 (as I was told)
    • I'm a man of many talents, I  used to be a famous actor.  Hehe.
×
×
  • Create New...