Jump to content

My father's Accurist watch ID ?


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Nucejoe said:

The keyless is idenitification card of movements.

Aparently your watch needs a full disassembly, good clean and lube, so you will eventually get to the keyless.

Then we'll have to see why set lever doesn't lock onto the stem as the stem sometimes comes out.

 

A few examples from ebay match up better with Ian's example.

Screenshot_20231204-205002_eBay.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, ianrichards said:

Excuse the novice question, but what do you mean by this ?

I won’t be touching this movement before I’ve honed my skills a lot more. 
Thanks. 
Ian

As mentioned earlier by myself and now Joe the setting components of the movement such as the setting lever ( pull out piece 😄 ), the yoke ( clutch lever, castle gear wheel lever ) set bridge with setting lever spring ( sometimes called a jumper spring ). Usually 3 pieces  can be used to identify a make and caliber, sort of a finger print . These components can be checked against a documented list, books that contain these lists are the Bestfit watch material catalogs ( American ) Flume ( German ) Catalogue Officiel ( Swiss ). As far as i know these list systems finished sometime in the 70's. 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

out of curiosity why did we rule out 1194?

then from the images on the website at the link below it also shows why taken the dial off is good 

I didn't,  calib 1194 is ofcourse the most probable answer.              just that I wasn't 100% sure.

You have said it      " taking the dial off "     only then we can be sure.

Plus the orientation of the balance cock is real confusing , both clock & anticlock orientations were made.

Newbies might not that lots of similar looking calibs were made.

Rgds

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

I didn't,

you didn't and I didn't but everybody else did we have to go back to page 1 of the discussion where it was ruled out so now we have to find something else

5 hours ago, ianrichards said:

Well, bearing in mind that I know nothing, I’ve put an arrow on what I’ve noticed is different. Is this relevant ?

5 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Relevant?  Yes.  The Ranfft has a removable end cap jewel for the escape wheel but also a a shock system on the balance "incabloc ", no shock on yours. 

let's go back to this webpage is it's not right by the way

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&AS_1194

the end stone on the escape wheel is not an issue the balance protection system is an issue sort of but not really let's go somewhere else

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=AS_1194

so here we get the parts list for the 1194 for which I have the feeling I've just done this the other day oh wait somebody else I think we did do this the other day it's a common movement with variations like on the parts list. Like for instance three different balance completes one of them with a well just like the link above a balance protection system another one with over coil hairspring which probably does not have a balance protection system the watch came in evolution of variations to your base caliber is probably this when you take the dial off someday you'll find out.

oh and before we leave how many different escape wheels you have there's four of them how can that be how can you have forced escape wheels for one watch it make it really complicated watch unless of course there were variations.

know what she should do should ask of someone would be nice and give you a link to the bestfit book you can download it for free but seeing as how I paid for mine I don't feel like telling anyone where to get it for free just one of my weird little things normal L Tilley about anything but somebody else will help to tell you where to get the bestfit book for free. Because the bestfit book has things like the fingerprint system which could be used to identify the watch once the dial comes off or it could be used to explain why four separate escape wheels exist for one watch in a way

so what happens when you identify a watch is you you end up with the base caliber and like this watch has been around for quite a while lots of variations here's the meeting of the different escape wheel pivots basically every combination you can have so the watch had lots of variations more than likely your watches the 1194 or some minor variation

image.thumb.png.232cea247085b03feb8b3e831fd7da69.png

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think from my own findings and what has been said here that I'll switch to naphtha as my post-pegging solvent, its also more compatible with my watch cleaning chemicals too. Making a new batch of watch cleaning solution and rinse solutions this weekend!
    • Interesting! Thanks for sharing this. I wonder, though, if the substances evaporate in similar quantities. What I mean is: let's say, if we open one container with acetone and one with naphtha for 10 seconds each. How many PPM's of each would go into the air for us to breathe in? Hypothetically, if acetone (1000ppm OSHA limit) evaporates 10 times faster than naphtha (100ppm OSHA limit), then they'd actually be equivalent in practical use. Anyways... if feel relatively safe with these solvents because I only open the jars very briefly and close immediate + I always open the windows wide when I do anything with these solvents.  
    • No need to doubt, You have received the wrong stone. 120 is 120 and will allways measure 120 as out diameter. What You did wrong is that You reamed the hole to 119, believing that this is the right way to fit new jewel there. Actually, the original jewel was rolled there and the hole and surrounding place has dedicated shape, and there often is no enough 'meat' to ream the hole and have normal walls as result, that will hold the pressed new type of stone right.  Often the decision is to ream enough so the surrounding of the hole is gone and make a bush that fits in this new hole, and the bush internal hole will take the stone. So now You can do just the same - ream more, fit bush in place and fit the stone in the bush.
    • The back when new would have been the same colour as the rest of the case as you can see very dark gun  metal is a very dark blue/black and would not be shiny. So unless the owner intends to match it how it would have been when new which  I don't think it can. It should be left as it is. 
    • Why all the fuss? I just use a big eyebrow tweezer to grip it and it works fine. The eyebrow tweezer also works great for replacing Chinese Incabloc springs that fall out.
×
×
  • Create New...