Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Coins be hands fouling, also check the leaf spring correctly sitting on the back of the seconds pinion if it has one. This spring is there to stop the seconds hand 'stuttering'. Just need to pop the back off and look.  

  • Like 2
Posted
29 minutes ago, brunomartins said:

Hi!

After cleaning my watch, this issue appeared. When setting hours the second hand has some movement.

What may cause this? Too much tight hands?

The image shows the problem

B0346B44-18B4-401F-8862-696BDB16F2D4.gif

The second hand moving backwards when setting the time backwards is quite common. I'm not sure i would call it an issue. Just tried it on my 2 year old seiko 5 and the second hand stops while i set the time. The main reason i always set the time forwards.

  • Like 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

 Does the oscilator stop or slow down when  seconds hands moves anti clock?  

What amplitude you get  ( in wind position of the crown ) ? 

 

Yes it slow down a little bit. Amplitude around 190

Posted (edited)

I just tried my cal 613 (same movement with date) and moving the hands doesn't have an effect on the seconds hand. I agree with @Waggy that it's probably the friction spring for the sweep seconds pinion.

Edited by mikepilk
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, brunomartins said:

Yes it slow down a little bit. Amplitude around 190

So the next test would be to remove the hr, min and seconds hands and repeat the test you did before;

If didn't slow down the oscilator, its the hand tubes that rub.

if did , the fault is with the canon pinion and/ or minute gear, tight canon pinion ....etc. 

You already have the canon pinion mounted on center arbour, so it needs not to be broached, just add a bit of oil on center arbour and turn the crown, this will reduce friction there and if you remove/ clean the oil/ grease the center arbour your done.

Stuttering seconds hand can be moved anti clock, but something must move it back, which takes us to faults said above.

 

 

Edited by Nucejoe
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

As the sweep seconds pinion sits inside the centre wheel, if there isn't enough tension on the friction spring, then the pinion may lose contact with the wheel driving it, then moving the hands (i.e. centre wheel) will move the seconds hand.  Does it do it if you have the face downwards?

a.thumb.jpg.2c9f2ebaea2111db54049146995507f6.jpg

Edited by mikepilk
Posted
On 9/26/2023 at 4:47 PM, brunomartins said:

Yes it slow down a little bit. Amplitude around 190

 

2 hours ago, mikepilk said:

 then the pinion may lose contact with the wheel driving it, then moving the hands (i.e. centre wheel) will move the seconds hand.  

 How does loss of contact between the pinion and driving wheel expalin the slowing down of the oscilator ?    which only slows when setting the hands.

Rgds

Posted
10 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

 

 How does loss of contact between the pinion and driving wheel expalin the slowing down of the oscilator ?    which only slows when setting the hands.

Rgds

Just to update I manage to test with hands off and could not tell difference 

Posted
5 hours ago, brunomartins said:

Just to update I manage to test with hands off and could not tell difference 

So the culprit is  NOT the hands tube rubbing .

I made a mistake in my previous post,

I said " its the hand"       should have said  " its not the hands "          

 

So , CANON PINION IS TIGHT.   Being already mounted on center tube means theres a good chance broaching is not needed, presuming you have lubricated the CANON PINION-CENTER TUBE , advancing the hands like 10 times round the clock should wipe out that  excess friction, thus you should gain back considerable amplitude and  seconds hand should no longer go back either. 

Rgds

 

Posted
On 9/26/2023 at 1:07 PM, brunomartins said:

After cleaning my watch, this issue appeared

I know you said you cleaned your watch, but I'm not going to make the assumption that you have serviced and properly lubricated it.

If you look at the third wheel on this Rolex 1215 (in the giff I posted) which drives the sweep second pinion (which isn't in situ), you'll find this moves quite a bit when setting the hands anti-clockwise, which in turn will always move the sweep second pinion regardless of how much tension you put on the brake spring. This is because the gear train is being moved when setting the hands anti-clockwise which strongly infers that the centre wheel is being turned via the cannon pinion and the whole gear train as well, thus a drop in amplitude and sometimes brings the movement to a complete stop. This is either the centre wheel not being lubricated properly, or/and the cannon pinion being slightly too tight on the centre wheel. Some like to have the movement come to a complete standstill as this is a type of 'hack'. I call it a 'poor man's hack'. The hand moving backward isn't such a big problem and you'll find that happens with other movements.

I'm guessing you didn't replace the mainspring, as a good amount of power/torque from the mainspring through the gear train will massively help overcome this, also, as I've already said, a well-lubricated centre wheel before the cannon pinion goes on and the correct tightness of the cannon pinion will also alleviate this. If you have a low amplitude, it suggests the mainspring needs replacing. If you haven't got at least 270 to 280 degrees amplitude, there is very little that you can do to solve this, as broaching the cannon pinion will only make the hand-setting sloppy.

That's why I initially asked about servicing and lubricating properly and this is why I bang on about changing the mainspring as standard because you are trying to diagnose and solve a problem when it was screaming at you all along. Not enough power from the mainspring!

Untitled video - Made with Clipchamp.gif

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Jon said:

I know you said you cleaned your watch, but I'm not going to make the assumption that you have serviced and properly lubricated it.

If you look at the third wheel on this Rolex 1215 (in the giff I posted) which drives the sweep second pinion (which isn't in situ), you'll find this moves quite a bit when setting the hands anti-clockwise, which in turn will always move the sweep second pinion regardless of how much tension you put on the brake spring. This is because the gear train is being moved when setting the hands anti-clockwise which strongly infers that the centre wheel is being turned via the cannon pinion and the whole gear train as well, thus a drop in amplitude and sometimes brings the movement to a complete stop. This is either the centre wheel not being lubricated properly, or/and the cannon pinion being slightly too tight on the centre wheel. Some like to have the movement come to a complete standstill as this is a type of 'hack'. I call it a 'poor man's hack'. The hand moving backward isn't such a big problem and you'll find that happens with other movements.

I'm guessing you didn't replace the mainspring, as a good amount of power/torque from the mainspring through the gear train will massively help overcome this, also, as I've already said, a well-lubricated centre wheel before the cannon pinion goes on and the correct tightness of the cannon pinion will also alleviate this. If you have a low amplitude, it suggests the mainspring needs replacing. If you haven't got at least 270 to 280 degrees amplitude, there is very little that you can do to solve this, as broaching the cannon pinion will only make the hand-setting sloppy.

That's why I initially asked about servicing and lubricating properly and this is why I bang on about changing the mainspring as standard because you are trying to diagnose and solve a problem when it was screaming at you all along. Not enough power from the mainspring!

Untitled video - Made with Clipchamp.gif

I didn't put it quite as detailed or as eloquently as you Jon , but i did kinda say its quite common. Did anyone listen ? 🤣

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Jon said:

 The hand moving backward isn't such a big problem and you'll find that happens with other movements.

Jobbers would have hard time convincing the watch owner to accept this.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

Jobbers would have hard time convincing the watch owner to accept this.

 

 

👍 they're a funny breed watch collectors, very particular, very critical, very " i know there is something wrong with my watch " kind of people.  Did i just say that out loud ? 😅 

Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

Jobbers would have hard time convincing the watch owner to accept this.

 

 

A new mainspring, a strong amplitude, good service with proper lubrication, and a perfect cannon pinion tightness, then there would be no need for any explanation, as there wouldn't be any movement of the second hand in this manner.... lol 

Edited by Jon
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Jon said:

A new mainspring, a strong amplitude, good service with proper lubrication, and a perfect cannon pinion tightness, then there would be no need for any explanation, as there wouldn't be any movement of the second hand in this manner.... lol 

👍thats a perfect test for me then, if the second hand moves backwards when setting the hand anticlockwise then I've made a crap job of the service. Probably why most of mine do that haha.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Hi everyone ! Thanks for all valuable tips! I tried some procedures and the problem has been solved. 
Basically I removed all hands, cleaned the second pinion, replaced hour and min hands to check a proper sit of them. After this I replaced the second pinion, lubricated the pivot that makes contact with the jewel. I also pulled little the spring the elevate this pinion (not sure if this was ell done).

Finally put the second hand with more accuracy and now the second hand is working properly.

  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi, this is the first place I found when looking for advice so I hope someone could advise me.  Im completely new to touching watches but I’ve always wondered how they work.  I’ve bought a cheap movement, an ETA replica to take apart and rebuild.  Im thinking I’ll need some screwdrivers, tweezers, movement holder and a loop? My goal is just to have a go first and see if I enjoy it enough before buying more tools.  Do I buy cheap tools for now and get better quality tools later if I enjoy it like I think I will? or will the cheap tools be a pain and take some of the fun out of it?  With quality tools being relatively expensive I’m unsure what to buy.    Any advice would be greatly appreciated!
    • Yeah I have seen 44-56 documented for Elgin 18 size elsewhere. I have the style of gauge that's like a set of feeler gauges and I never noticed before today it is faintly stamped "Elgin". Pictured is the way I have been measuring. I am going to go to a larger jewel than the 42 that had been in there. I recently won an auction on a big set of Fitrite jewels all in the little bottles, to discover that the what's actually in the bottles bears no relation to the chart of sizes printed on the box. In most cases it seems to be all mixed so in fact I have about 24 little bottles and thousands of assorted jewels of all diameters and lengths, which is better than nothing. But since I don't have a micrometer with a table, measuring for the exact diameter will be a big job. Instead I will test a lot of them in the fork slot the same way I measure with the gauge. But this is still the next thing. I have to get the escapement to unlock first.
    • it would be nice to have the exact model of the watch the or a picture so we can see exactly what you're talking about. this is because the definition of Swiss watch could be a variety of things and it be helpful if we could see exactly the watch your dealing with then in professional watch repair at least some professionals they do pre-cleaned watches. In other words the hands and dial come off and the entire movement assembled goes through a cleaning machine sometimes I think a shorter bath perhaps so everything is nice and clean for disassembly makes it easier to look for problems. Then other professionals don't like pre-cleaning because it basically obliterates the scene of the crime. Especially when dealing with vintage watches where you're looking for metal filings and problems that may visually go away with cleaning. Then usually super sticky lubrication isn't really a problem for disassembly and typically shouldn't be a problem on a pallet fork bridge because there shouldn't be any lubrication on the bridge at all as you typically do not oil the pallet fork pivots.  
    • A few things you should find out before you can mske a decision of what to do. As Richard said, what is the crown and all of the crown components made of . Then also the stem .  The crown looks to have a steel washer that retains a gasket. So be careful with what chemicals you use to dissolve any stem adhesives or the use of heat. You might swell or melt the gasket unless you are prepared to change that also . The steel washer maybe reactive to alum. Something I've just used to dissolve a broken screw from a plate. First drilled out the centre of the screw with a 0.5mm carbide . Dipped only the section that held the broken screw in Rustins rust remover. This is 40 % phosphoric acid. 3 days and the screw remains were completely dissolved, no trace of steel in the brass threads. A black puddle left in the solution.
    • I suppose this will add to the confusion I have a roller jewel assortment. It lists out American pocket watches for Elgin 18 size and even 16 size it's a 50. But not all the various companies used 50-50 does seem to be common one company had a 51 and the smallest is 43. American parts are always interesting? Francis Elgin for mainsprings will tell you the thickness of the spring other companies will not even though the spring for the same number could come in a variety of thicknesses. But if we actually had the model number of your watch we would find it probably makes a reference that the roller jewel came in different dimensions. So overlook the parts book we find that? So it appears to be 18 and 16 size would be the same sort of the arson different catalog numbers and as I said we don't have your Mongol know which Log number were supposed to be using. Variety of materials garnered her sapphire single or double but zero mention about diameters. Then in a section of rollers in this case rollers with jewels we do get this down in the notes section Roller specifications but of course zero reference to the jewel size. I was really hoping the roller jewel assortment would give us sizes it doesn't really. But it does show a picture of how one particular roller jewel gauge is used  
×
×
  • Create New...