Jump to content

Damaged(?) Elliott Platform Escapement


Snudge88

Recommended Posts

I've recently taken delivery of a Mappin & Webb mantle clock with an Elliott 8-day lever Westminster chime mechanism.

I've attempted to set the time, with the chime switched off as per the instructions, and I've ended up with the hands essentially stuck between 5:52 and 6:07. There's almost a blockage at either end of the 'wedge' beyond which the minute hand won't move. If the clock is allowed to run until 6:07, the mechanism simply peters out to a stop, and starts right back up again if the hand is moved back to an earlier position.

What's gone on here, and how easily can it be rectified? Will the clock damage itself further if left with the hands at 6:07?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to the forum…..      I in its present state (cased up) you will not be able to see anything so do not go cranking the hands round as it will lead to breakages.  First remove the hands and then the movement and have a look at the complete thing. Check that nothing has dropped causing a jam.  A wheel / lever might be out of place by not being clipped or pinned properly..   also post pictures of the front/rear and from the sides they help a lot in diagnosis.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As watchweasol has said. Just remove the hands and take the movement out of its case. You will then be able to see if any thing has stuck. I wold make sure you have power on the chime and strike side and move the lever for chime and strike up and down a fey times, leave it on so it will chime and strike then see if you can move the hands but be very careful if they will not go forward take a few photos so we can have a look. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
    • Maybe I'm over simplifying this and I'm a little late to the discussion, but just by my looking at oil when I use it on a treated cap jewel  the oil stays in one nice bubble, but when I don't it spreads out to the edges of the jewel. I'm not sure (but could well be wrong) but the analogy of a waxed car and rain is accurate in this case, the wax is very hydrophobic and repels the water, however, the process epilame works by is a different physical process based upon cohesion/adhesion (oleophilic) not repulsion (oleophobic)  at least as far as I have read/observed. If one were to use a oleophobic substance equivalent to wax (hydrophobic) then one would need to create a donut shape to fence in the oil, however if one used such a strategy with a epilame which is oleophilic then the oil would sit on the ring of the donut and not in the 'donut hole', exactly where you don't want it. Even if the oil is smeared then the oleophilic epilame should pull it back to the center (see diagram below). Reference For interest the chemical in epilame is 2-(PERFLUOROHEXYL) ETHYL METHACRYLATE, CAS NO: 2144-53-8
    • Looks lint the teeth on the hour wheel aren't meshing with the teeth on the calendar intermediate wheel, maybe the hour wheel is sitting on top of this instead of meshing?        
×
×
  • Create New...