Jump to content

Omega T12.6 & T17 plating? Risks of U/S cleaner


Recommended Posts

Hello folks, 

I usually clean my movement parts in an ultrasonic cleaner with three jars: 1. L&R 111; 2. and 3. L&R No3 rinse. I usually do 5min each. 

With one exception, this has worked very well for me. However, an AS574 from. The 1930s had started to loose it's plating during this procedure. 

Now, I'll soon my servicing two 1930s Omega movements: a 12.6 (or T12.6) and a T17. 

Since these watches/movements are very dear to me and also come form the 1930s, I'm scared to damage the plating like I did on the AS 574. 

1. Does anyone know what plating is used for the 12.6 and T17 movements? 

2. Any advice on the use of the L&R cleaners and the U/S for this specific situation/movements? 

To reduce risks, I was thinking to reducing the time in the U/S machine (e.g. 3 times 2min), or even switching entirely to a more manual benzine-soak-brush+IPA approach. 

Before I get crucified, please let me assure you that I have read all the posts in the general debate on U/S cleaners. I'm really looking for more specific insights regarding the type of plating, the era (1930s) or even the specific movements. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like to keep the ultrasonic to a minimum. As you have found, it can be destructive. Maybe you could reduce the rinse times?

I use Elma cleaners. The Elma product info sheets recommends 2-10 mins cleaning, and about 3 mins rinse. 

In the ultrasonic, I do jar 1, 5 mins clean, then jars 2 and 3, 3 mins rinse in each, and a final 30s rinse in IPA.  

This gets everything nice and clean for me, and I've never noticed any plate damage.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 8/16/2023 at 3:19 PM, Knebo said:

I usually do 5min each.

usually it's the cleaning solution that's the problem with the ultrasonic. The rinse should be relatively harmless and it shouldn't be a problem.

4 hours ago, Knebo said:

ith 4min cleaning and 2x 3min rinsing in the U/S and respective L&R products, the plating on the Omega T12.6 has stayed intact. 

when I was in school where we are continuously cleaning watches all day along the same watches all day long the machine had been taped so you couldn't go past four minutes on the cleaning. So I was thought that was a nice quantity of time and would always go maximum of four minutes. That I would usually do the same amount of time with the rinse because I don't think that's an issue.

also it depends upon your fluids and the instruction sheets but I've seen that you ideally should not elevate the temperature the cleaning fluids. Because my interpretation was by elevating the temperatures beyond room temperature that's equivalent to lengthening the time in the ultrasonic possibly even worse as it makes things much more aggressive but this depends upon the particular cleaning fluids you using and whatever machine you're using also.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

ideally should not elevate the temperature the cleaning fluids

Indeed, I left it at room temperature. 

In other movements, I had experimented with temperatures up to 40 degrees Celsius (with L&R 111 and No3 cleaners/rinse). And up to 8min cycles. It didn't do any harm until that AS574... so yeah, from now on 4min (per cycle) at room temperature. 

 

38 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

maximum of four minutes

Interesting! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

14 hours ago, Knebo said:

L&R 111

being curious about this looking at the website and noticed they recommend 3 to 5 minutes.

https://www.lrultrasonics.com/solutions/111-ammoniated-waterless-watch-cleaning-solution-112

14 hours ago, Knebo said:

It didn't do any harm until that AS574... so yeah, from now on 4min (per cycle) at room temperature. 

in the first school I was at the cleaning machine had a timer and you can go to 10 minutes. Serve you go to 10 minutes why not go there? Plus as an added bonus the way the ultrasonic worked of course it would heat up whatever you're cleaning addenda 10 minutes it would we warm probably fused a couple of minutes it probably wouldn't heat up that much but it did have a really big vacuum tube in the base. So I was learned my lesson when shiny pocket watch went in frosty pocket watch came out with a rather pretty blue colored solution. Then when I went to the other school the machine was taped over four minutes. Little is good but going too long and you're going to regret it one way or another. Fortunately I is able to polish the plates and make them look nice again. then in watch repair those painful lessons to remind us not to do that every again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

 

being curious about this looking at the website and noticed they recommend 3 to 5 minutes.

The recommendation for Elma WF Pro is  2-10 mins.  Do the professional cleaning machines use ultrasonic for the whole cleaning cycle?

I usually do 5 mins in the ultrasonic. I think I'll take your advice @JohnR725 and try 4 mins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, mikepilk said:

Do the professional cleaning machines use ultrasonic for the whole cleaning cycle?

it probably depends upon a lot of factors including personal choice.

it also of course depends upon the cleaning machine.

for instance at the links below to separate cleaning machines that have ultrasonic. Notice in the specification it says ultrasonic for every cycle and for documentation you can download the manuals for these so out of the freedom manual we get recommended or the preprogram cycles. You'll notice that they use ultrasonic and every cycle.

image.png.f75052c97d78585d105e972d4d427c5b.png

http://lititzpp.com/freedom.php

http://lititzpp.com/matador.php

here's another cleaning machine where it's easier to figure out about the ultrasonic if we look at the video and I just snipped out an image. then yes this is an incredibly complicated machine with as far as I can tell everything is programmable in it.

image.png.969685d64122fdadf38cf006b17c0a59.png

https://youtu.be/4F67g_F_L14?si=-MszC1okUv-BmlZg

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hello,

a late follow up.

So for two very old Omega movements from the 1930s, one T12.6 and one T17, I recently used the ultrasonic cleaner with one cycle of L&R 111 and tow cycles of L&R No3 rinse. Each cycle was reduced to 4min to be safe.

Both came out spotless without any damage to the plating.

I guess the AS574 where the plating came of was an exception and due to the excessively long US cycles, or simply prior damage to the plating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Welcome Gary, enjoy the forum.
    • There is a known fault with the 3135 which is if the watch has not been serviced the Auto rotor can wear. See attached pic.    
    • How do I check that?
    • I sort of am expecting that ring to push against the rim of the crystal and possibly a seal against the front of the case. Hence everything comes out the back. Nothing else seems to make sense to me. I am trying to imagine why the crystal would not push out unless the ring needs to be backed off to allow the crystal to be pushed out, but then how does the ring come out? I am new to stripping watches though and am happy to stand corrected. 🙂 
    • Hi @Roll1ex, welcome to the forum. It's considered good practice to introduce yourself to the forum in this thread: https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/forum/23-introduce-yourself-here/ But no worries. I don't have the spec sheet for the 15xx movements, but when I look at the 31xx information, it stands out that the endshake of the rotor should be between 0.01 and 0.03mm. That is LESS than the pallet fork and the lowest of all endshakes in the movement. Not exactly sure what you mean by that. The rotor itself is a unique part which doesn't have different heights. If you mean the height at which it is installed vis-a-vis the automatic bridge, then yes, that can be adjusted a bit via the two jewels that hold the rotor axle. Height differences vis-a-vis the bridge can also be caused by the strength with which the new axle is hammered/riveted into the rotor. And yes, that can be compensated a bit via the jewels.   This would probably indicate that the axle isn't perfectly perpendicular to the rotor. That could explain why the weight is closer to the rest of the movement at 9 o'clock -- it would then be furthest at 3 o'clock. That would be bad news. A new axle should then be installed... and properly this time.   As I wrote already, there is margin for adjustment via the jewels. As for the spring clip, the 15xx movements only seems to have one spring clip thickness (part 7911 - https://www.cousinsuk.com/PDF/categories/2878_Rolex 1530 Pages 6-10.pdf). The later 31xx movments have several versions with different thicknesses. But there is a good chance that the clip is worn (=thinner than it should) and should then be replaced.   But, in conclusion, if the rotor hits the caseback in one particular postion, then my first suspicion is that the axle wasn't punched in at a perfect 90° angle. That must first be re-done correctly. No other fixes will be solving that problem. Furthermore, if the rotor "dings" against the caseback when the watch is shaken (but not in other situations), then there is likely also an issue of endshake (more an issue of the jewels) or lateral play (more likely the sping clip).      PS: by whom? Independent or RSC? 
×
×
  • Create New...