Jump to content

Glue for case back (not crystals)


Recommended Posts

I'm working on a cheap quartz watch. i changed the press fit crystal and the battery. The case back was glued on and now i'm having trouble finding what is the proper type of glue to use on a case back.

I've read a lot about gluing crystals, but can't find anything about gluing case backs.

My experience with epoxy is that, in general, it is very difficult to undo (for the next time you want to remove the case back.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@kd8tzc and @Waggy I agree - to clarify - Gluing a case back just didn't ring true. I am new to watchmaking so this may be completely due to my inexperience. The case gasket was hardened and in pieces and only partially there, which i didn't notice when i removed the case back. I should have inspected it then but i didn't. However, once i noticed the state of the case back gasket, i replaced it with at new one which i greased with silicone. When i used my case press to reinstall the case, i could not get it to snap in. I inspected both the case and the case back and could not determine any lip that would allow the case back to snap on. Just as a further experiment, i tried to snap on the case back without the gasket with no luck. On further inspection i noticed, what appears to be glue residue inside the case. So i assumed that the only way the case was attached was by glue. I'm probably still missing something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, signcarver said:

@kd8tzc and @Waggy I agree - to clarify - Gluing a case back just didn't ring true. I am new to watchmaking so this may be completely due to my inexperience. The case gasket was hardened and in pieces and only partially there, which i didn't notice when i removed the case back. I should have inspected it then but i didn't. However, once i noticed the state of the case back gasket, i replaced it with at new one which i greased with silicone. When i used my case press to reinstall the case, i could not get it to snap in. I inspected both the case and the case back and could not determine any lip that would allow the case back to snap on. Just as a further experiment, i tried to snap on the case back without the gasket with no luck. On further inspection i noticed, what appears to be glue residue inside the case. So i assumed that the only way the case was attached was by glue. I'm probably still missing something?

As Tom is suggesting press on casebacks tend to have a slightly convex shape to them. When pressed in the center this then flexes and increases the caseback's  diameter slightly to help enable it to snap over the retaining lip of the case. As the pressure is released the caseback recovers it's convex shape and grips the lip to hold in place. Tom could be right, it might be bent inwards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are some casebacks with incredibly thin gaskets, like 0.15mm thin. The thinnest gaskets I can get from Cousins is 0.3mm. Even with a lot of persuasion, I have never managed to squeeze a 0.3mm gasket into such casebacks. 

In such instances, I have resorted to using plumber's tape and UHU glue.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As other have said, can you post a picture.

I wonder if the glue that was used is part of the issue.  Possibly it is preventing the caseback from snapping into place due to old glue somewhere.  Hard to tell without seeing though.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK - i think i figured it out. The original case back gasket was "hardened" and broken into pieces, with some pieces missing. I assumed it was a standard rubber gasket that had hardened. I now believe that it was a plastic hard gasket all along. That would have created a lip that allowed the case back to snap on. Replacing the original gasket with a soft rubber one wouldn't, and didn't, solve the problem. Doh!

So now i'm in search for a hard (plastic) gasket.

Thank you all for your insights and suggestions! 👍

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I agree - I use a magnetometer app on my iPad. A few years ago, I did invest in the Elma version of this demagnetiser. I have a background in electronics and when I cracked the unit open to explore it, I was very impressed - and reassured - by the careful attention given to the design and the quality of construction and quality of materials.  It will out-live me, and not because of any shock hazard 🙂  I find it very reliable for demagentizing watch movements, but for tools, especially elongated tools like tweezers and screwdrivers, they need to be done in sections, a couple of centimetres at a time.  I always also repeat the demagentising process several times with the object (usually a movement) oriented in several different planes - horizontally at 0 and 90 degrees and vertically.  Checking on the magnetometer app, the movement is effectively degaussed and I’ve not yet had to repeat the process. Just laying the movement horizontally and giving it a single shot sometimes works, but often doesn’t, hence my process above.  Using a compass, I doubt I’d ever know whether the process was effective or not.  The magnetometer is much more sensitive. I still use the Lepsi app, which was available for free, but which I don’t think is  available on the App Store any more.    
    • Hello everyone, I have just started on my  watch repair journey. Many mistakes …pinging springs and lost pallet forks !! My great Uncle was a clock maker with a royal warrant  and his ancestor stated the first hall in London so hopefully some thing rubs off . Looking forward to following the  topics on this forum 
    • @RichardHarris123 I just look for a relative increase or decrease as it passes over the watch, not an absolute value. It it doesn't change much passing over the watch, than I conclude little or no magnetism, if I see the value jump from the background number, than I know I have a problem  
    • How accurate is it? Does it take the earths magnetic field into account, what is an acceptable reading?
    • I use the same thing on my android:
×
×
  • Create New...