Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thank you both. As I said at the beginning of this project I won't be disappointed if it doesn't run but I don't like to admit defeat. The hole for the pin is around 0.4mm diameter so I will get some 0.5mm hard brass wire and give it a go.

Mike

Posted

I fabricated an impulse pin from a 0.3 to 0.6mm tapered brass clock pin. It's an interference fit in the roller plate so no adhesive needed and about the right diameter for the pallet fork. If I gently push the balance wheel to and fro the pallet moves back and forth but the balance doesn't  turn freely and the watch still doesn't run. With the original paper shim under the balance cock the sideshake and endshake seem about right according to Mr de Carle. It's hard to be certain but I think the roller plate may be touching the top of the pallet.

Then when I removed the balance assembly the wheel dropped off the spring. This might explain why the roller plate was too low? If I try to refit it how do I know if the two parts are correctly aligned?

Mike

balance_3.jpg

Posted
2 hours ago, MJD said:

Then when I removed the balance assembly the wheel dropped off the spring. This might explain why the roller plate was too low? If I try to refit it how do I know if the two parts are correctly aligned?

By the way hairsprings are not supposed to fall off the balance staff at all. You see the center brass collet? That is supposed to friction fit on the staff. So if it just falls off that's definitely a problem that will have to be fixed because the watch will not run if it's not tight on the collet.

Then looking at your picture I see some problems and not a crisis problem can zero care about running but there's something else

so yes it's a bit fuzzy but where's the pivot?

image.png.2b37f71cd9a19c749b30541a736c8735.png

If your pivot is too short because it's broken then the entire balance wheel will drop down just a little bit and that would definitely be an issue.

Then the collet even actually falls off you going to have to ideally should tighten the collet the problem is tightening can be a challenge as now require more tools. Which unfortunately is a problem in watch repair is always a specialty tool for something but don't worry none of us have enough tools

image.png.aedcccda5223f2b8f095b5f02bea9ffe.png

Then this is a big problem considering everything else more of an amusement Then by the way your roller jewel looks quite nice that looks fine notice I circled two screws and mark the other two notice how they look a little bit different and they have much longer threads? That's because these are adjustable screws for timekeeping purposes which typically would never be screwed in tight the balance wheel they would stick out a little bit so you would have a range of adjustment. But seeing as how you just want the watch to run and not keep time we won't worry about. But it is always troubling when the screws are in tight when they Not be

image.png.c14c51018dc79ce9e6cfea3a88da4459.png

 

Posted
2 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

If you watch videos on replacing balance staffs, they show how to get the hairspring in the correct position.  Mark, our host does a good one.  The collet is going to need tightening. 

Thanks I'll have a look for those videos. How does one tighten the collet?

Mike

23 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

By the way hairsprings are not supposed to fall off the balance staff at all. You see the center brass collet? That is supposed to friction fit on the staff. So if it just falls off that's definitely a problem that will have to be fixed because the watch will not run if it's not tight on the collet.

Then looking at your picture I see some problems and not a crisis problem can zero care about running but there's something else

so yes it's a bit fuzzy but where's the pivot?

image.png.2b37f71cd9a19c749b30541a736c8735.png

If your pivot is too short because it's broken then the entire balance wheel will drop down just a little bit and that would definitely be an issue.

Then the collet even actually falls off you going to have to ideally should tighten the collet the problem is tightening can be a challenge as now require more tools. Which unfortunately is a problem in watch repair is always a specialty tool for something but don't worry none of us have enough tools

image.png.aedcccda5223f2b8f095b5f02bea9ffe.png

Then this is a big problem considering everything else more of an amusement Then by the way your roller jewel looks quite nice that looks fine notice I circled two screws and mark the other two notice how they look a little bit different and they have much longer threads? That's because these are adjustable screws for timekeeping purposes which typically would never be screwed in tight the balance wheel they would stick out a little bit so you would have a range of adjustment. But seeing as how you just want the watch to run and not keep time we won't worry about. But it is always troubling when the screws are in tight when they Not be

image.png.c14c51018dc79ce9e6cfea3a88da4459.png

 

Thanks for all the helpful and interesting information. I will examine the pivot tomorrow to see if it is indeed broken. I should be able to get a better picture with my microscope.

Mike

@JohnR725 I think you were right about a pivot being broken 😢. The top one (on the left in the picture).

So where do I go from here? Are there standard sizes of balance staff or is it a custom job?

Mike

balance staff.jpg

Posted
2 hours ago, MJD said:

I will examine the pivot tomorrow to see if it is indeed broken. I should be able to get a better picture with my microscope.

We don't really need a better picture as one pivot is definitely very very gone and the other pivot is so short it might as well be gone. Which unfortunately is a new balance staff which will present a problem and a whole bunch a more tools to buy.

Posted

Standard sizes of staffs exist but it doesn't mean yours is a standard size and even if it is, a replacement may not be available.  You'll have to measure the staff and we can help you find a replacement if possible.  The next problem after that is reassembly. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

 Your watch is in need of a donor movement and there should be a chance of finding one as most such pieces were cased in gold back then and later salvaged for the gold.

Rgds

 

 

Posted
10 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

We don't really need a better picture as one pivot is definitely very very gone and the other pivot is so short it might as well be gone. Which unfortunately is a new balance staff which will present a problem and a whole bunch a more tools to buy.

OK well at least I know now why the watch doesn't run. Whether this was the original problem or something I did during my investigations I'll never know. I doubt I have the necessary skills to fit a new one but maybe I can find a local watchmaker to do the work

Mike

9 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Standard sizes of staffs exist but it doesn't mean yours is a standard size and even if it is, a replacement may not be available.  You'll have to measure the staff and we can help you find a replacement if possible.  The next problem after that is reassembly. 

Thanks @RichardHarris123. I can measure the diameter of the staff but what about length - to the shoulders? Also I presume I need to measure the diameter of the pivot (or what's left of it)?

Mike

4 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

 Your watch is in need of a donor movement and there should be a chance of finding one as most such pieces were cased in gold back then and later salvaged for the gold.

Rgds

 

 

I will look into that if I can't get this one repaired.

Mike

Posted
5 minutes ago, MJD said:

OK well at least I know now why the watch doesn't run. Whether this was the original problem or something I did during my investigations I'll never know. I doubt I have the necessary skills to fit a new one but maybe I can find a local watchmaker to do the work

One of the problems with nonstructured learning or learning as you go is well you can go down the rabbit hole really fast and. Basically something that may look relatively simple becomes really really complicated. With the added bonus of none of us by the way have enough tools but almost any need a whole bunch of tools that you hadn't counted on needing. On the other hand you done really well so far and all of this could still be fixed.

Then ideally for the staff measurements we need more than one dimension. It depends upon the reference e-book you look at but I do have the book of miscellaneous balance staffs and here's what they're expecting. Then for the length you have to make an estimate. Ideally be nice to find the original staff but unlikely not impossible just unlikely. Then the next best you could hope for is a staff that's really close that can be trimmed to fit. Then worst case somebody has to make a new one. Then yes there are people it will make balance staffs out there.

image.png.3e39082f3d9fedd322be99ae5b5523e5.png

 

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

One of the problems with nonstructured learning or learning as you go is well you can go down the rabbit hole really fast and. Basically something that may look relatively simple becomes really really complicated. With the added bonus of none of us by the way have enough tools but almost any need a whole bunch of tools that you hadn't counted on needing. On the other hand you done really well so far and all of this could still be fixed.

Then ideally for the staff measurements we need more than one dimension. It depends upon the reference e-book you look at but I do have the book of miscellaneous balance staffs and here's what they're expecting. Then for the length you have to make an estimate. Ideally be nice to find the original staff but unlikely not impossible just unlikely. Then the next best you could hope for is a staff that's really close that can be trimmed to fit. Then worst case somebody has to make a new one. Then yes there are people it will make balance staffs out there.

image.png.3e39082f3d9fedd322be99ae5b5523e5.png

 

Thanks @JohnR725, I've had a go at measuring the staff as best I can without removing the balance and roller so I couldn't get to the balance shoulder seat. I used an electronic digital caliper which I've calibrated against a mechanical micrometer. Not sure if you need metric or imperial but here's what I got. Obviously the length is inaccurate due to the damaged/missing pivots.

Mike

balance staff dimensions.jpg

Edited by MJD
additional information
Posted

This was posted yesterday by Kalle on the Chronoglide channel, it might help.

 

 

it is specifically centred around the balance staff in an unknown movement.

 

Tom

  • Like 1
Posted
37 minutes ago, tomh207 said:

This was posted yesterday by Kalle on the Chronoglide channel, it might help.

 

 

it is specifically centred around the balance staff in an unknown movement.

 

Tom

Thank you Tom for that amazingly helpful video. Now I need to remove the balance and roller so I can measure the staff properly.

Mike

Posted
3 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

As @JohnR725 pointed out, you have done well so far.  Measure the staff properly and we'll help from there. 

That's very kind of you to say so @RichardHarris123 but I wouldn't have got this far without the help of this forum.

I have removed the roller but I'm not brave enough to attempt to remove the balance. Still I think I can get a close measurement of the balance shoulder seat under the microscope.

Can you confirm that the measurements in the DCN catalogue are in mm, i.e. "673" = 6.73mm?

Mike

PHO00028.JPG

Posted
3 minutes ago, tomh207 said:

I agree with @RichardHarris123 if a European movement it will be measured in 1/100th of a millimetre.

 

Tom

OK thanks. I have repeated the measurements as best I can, making a small allowance for the missing pivot. According to the chap in the Chronoglide video it isn't necessary to measure the pivot diameter as they are standard. I had a look at the online DCN and Ronda catalogues but there is no mention of Newsome. It's a 20 ligne watch.

Any suggestions for how I can proceed please?

Mike

balance staff dimensions.JPG

Posted

I think as Kalle said it would be now trying to match the ligne size to the overall estimated size of the staff. Sorry I am not able to be more helpful 😢

 

Tom

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, MJD said:

According to the chap in the Chronoglide video it isn't necessary to measure the pivot diameter as they are standard.

The definition of standard can be quite amusing. My favorite balance staff to make fun of is the Elgin 857 one part number for how many staff's? They came in Four variations. Then in each of variation categories it also had pivots size differences. With two of them having up to five different pivots sizes.

Oh and thinking of pivots sizes we should also check your jewels often times when pivots get broken The hole jewels Can be cracked or broken and on a really horrible drop the end stone Will be broken.

Oh almost forgot to add I have another reference book labeled American staffs by size but it does have some foreign staffs unfortunately I don't see anything that's exact bit but often times you get something close and you modify it if you have access to a Lathe otherwise you get to make a new one.

image.png.bc62d845613b46ed3e82a095cb79a6eb.png

Edited by JohnR725
Posted

OK I will start searching the catalogues for a match. No lathe here ...

I'm going on holiday so it will be a while before I can make any serious progress, but thanks again to everyone here.

Mike

  • Like 1
Posted
20 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

The definition of standard can be quite amusing. My favorite balance staff to make fun of is the Elgin 857 one part number for how many staff's? They came in Four variations. Then in each of variation categories it also had pivots size differences. With two of them having up to five different pivots sizes.

Oh and thinking of pivots sizes we should also check your jewels often times when pivots get broken The hole jewels Can be cracked or broken and on a really horrible drop the end stone Will be broken.

Oh almost forgot to add I have another reference book labeled American staffs by size but it does have some foreign staffs unfortunately I don't see anything that's exact bit but often times you get something close and you modify it if you have access to a Lathe otherwise you get to make a new one.

image.png.bc62d845613b46ed3e82a095cb79a6eb.png

I had a look through the DCN catalogue and like you I found a couple that were similar but not close enough to be modified.

Interestingly there were very few 20 ligne movements listed.

Mike

DCN_39.JPG

DCN_55.JPG

Posted
15 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

What do you intend doing? 

Right now I'm going on holiday. I'll get back to this in a couple of weeks. Maybe look for a local watchmaker who can help.

Mikr

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We the human beings never see our own aging.      
    • Hello Tom and welcome to the forum.
    • Hah! Well, California will have to do. Lived in TX for a brief period back in the early 70s, though, so maybe that counts. 🙂 Funny you should mention making vacuum tubes- I've actually tinkered with that! It's REALLY tough to do, and I've never made one more complicated than a simple diode that barely worked, but I have played around at it. But there's just no infrastructure for vacuum tube fabrication. I can get a lathe and learn how to use it to make complex parts, and while it might take a while to learn- and money to get the equipment, of course- it is possible to do more or less "off the shelf". But vacuum tubes, not so much. There are a few folks out there doing some crazy cool work with bespoke tubes, but they have setups that are far beyond what I can manage in my environment and it's mostly stuff they built by hand. I also have been playing with making piezoelectric Rochelle Salt crystals to replace ancient vacuum tube turntable needles- nobody's made those commercially for probably 60 years. I'm a sucker for learning how to do weird things no one does any more so I can make things no one uses work again. (I think this is drifting off the topic of lathes, lol).
    • You shoulda been born in Texas. Tough to make a vacuum tube though. You can substitute with a MOSFET eq ckt I guess. I was playing around making a pinion the other day. More to it than meets the eye.
    • Well, turns out it was a fake bezel! The crystal is domed mineral glass and I was able to find a cheap replacement that should be here in two days.  I used my crappy little press to pop out the cracked crystal, Ill give the case a good cleaning in the meantime and do a once over on the movement.     
×
×
  • Create New...