Jump to content

Making a stem for a watch, I don't understand the tap sizes


Recommended Posts

I recently purchased a brand-spanking new Sherline lathe, which has the ability to cut threads.  However, I am still unsure of how the stem tap measurements work.  Some websites say that the tap is proportional to the thread diameter (larger diameter = larger tap).  Some websites say that the tap is inversely proportional to the thread diameter (larger diameter = smaller tap).

Then there is the issue of what the actual thread pitch of the stem is.  Assuming the simple approach of tap being proportional to diameter, what is the thread pitch or TPI of these tap numbers?  I've read that it closely resembles the Bourgeaux thread series.  But I can't get a straightforward answer of what exactly the Bourgeaux thread series is.  Different websites report different numbers.  I can't find an authoritative source to get the actual numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

That defo warrants a photo Greg, what on earth were you thinking ? That you could get away without one 🤨

Because I purchased it so recently that it hasn't even shipped from Sherline yet. 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi John, that was one of the websites I found before making this post.  I bought the inch version of the lathe, but you can still cut metrics threads.  The instruction manual for the thread cutting attachment includes the gear setup for cutting metric threads on an inch lathe and vice versa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

Here is the table for  Bourgeaux thread series.

https://www.sizes.com/tools/thread_bourgeaux.htm

 

Thanks hippy.  That was one of the websites I was referring to when I mentioned that different websites report different numbers. 

Mainly

https://www.sizes.com/tools/thread_bourgeaux.htm

and 

https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~alanb/martin.html

The sizes.com also has a page on the Latard series, and gives a reference to a nearly 100 year old German book.  So at least it's something to go by.  But there are no such references for the Bourgeaux thread.

Then there's also this book (p69 and p70) which reports that Bourgeaux had a pitch of 0.94^n or 0.9^n, neither of which conform to those two websites.

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Randall-Brooks/publication/233455494_Standard_Screw_Threads_For_Scientific_Instruments_Part_I_Production_Techniques_And_The_Filiere_Suisse/links/568c0ec708ae153299b63b04/Standard-Screw-Threads-For-Scientific-Instruments-Part-I-Production-Techniques-And-The-Filiere-Suisse.pdf

However, this whole point is moot if there is a place that can give the exact dimensions of current stem threads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, GregG said:

this whole point is moot if there is a place that can give the exact dimensions of current stem threads

The problem with looking for certain specifications is the specifications only exist if someone is trying to make that item typically. The problem becomes finding the specifications become problematic if nobody's actually making stems and him.

Then at one time they used to make a set for re-tapping the crown. The that a holder for the crown a drill and a tap and it was made by star and that's all the information you get the sizes are intent's of a millimeter. But it doesn't say give the guy information you're looking for as I didn't assume you be using it to try to make a stem.

There is a couple links you might have missed perhaps

https://mb.nawcc.org/threads/watch-stem-threads-made-on-sherline.157058/

I think this one covers the same stuff you have but to put it here anyway

https://mb.nawcc.org/threads/watch-stem-tap-sizes.124651/

I think probably what you're going to have to do is get stems of the size you like to make and imitate the threads that you find on them.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I went with the CNC-ready package, so I had to supply my own motors. I've written a rudimentary "CNC" program in Python that takes an SVG outline of a balance staff that I create and moves the motors to cut accordingly.  But I haven't stitched all the pieces together yet.

They are also closed loop stepper motors, meaning they have an internal feedback mechanism to accurately control the position.

Edited by GregG
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, oldhippy said:

Are you sure its big enough to make a watch stem. 🤣

On a somewhat related note, I found a video about the American Precision Museum, and they had one of the machines used to make watch screws (at 48 seconds if it doesn't automatically jump to that point).

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GregG said:

and they had one of the machines used to make watch screws

here's a book that talks about things like this unfortunately not the kind of detail I would like but still interesting.

The Evolution of Automatic Machinery: As Applied to the Manufacture of Watches at Waltham, Mass

https://archive.org/details/evolutionautoma00marsgoog

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GregG said:

On a somewhat related note, I found a video about the American Precision Museum, and they had one of the machines used to make watch screws (at 48 seconds if it doesn't automatically jump to that point).

 

 

I believe this is an identical machine in action, amazing for 1870s!

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

 

I believe this is an identical machine in action, amazing for 1870s!

 

 

 

I think the video you linked to is the video that is playing on the iPad in the museum video. XD

Edited by GregG
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When faced with say a pocket watch bridge which is cracked, silver soldering to repair is often the only option (hopefully someone wasn't there before hand with soft solder). I can generally do this succesfully and tidily with a small torch and miniscule pieces of silver solder, but on parts which were mercury amalgam gilded the heat can have have a deleterious effect on the finish.   I keep wondering if there's a good way to refinish these - and despite having the needful items would rather avoid using the mercury process.   In the past for electronic work I've gold plated PCBs but this involved gold potassium cyanide solution, which also doesn't realy belong at home. I've read that there are now safer alternatives but couldn't find more detail (and importantly how similar are the results to amalgam gilding, since I wouldn't want to refinish the whole watch). Pointers would be very welcome (and yes, I know solutions containing gold won't be cheap!) Alan
    • The first one is an Unruh max stake for pushing out staffs
    • Ok so with the great answers for my previous question may I ask what these two attachments are used for. The one with the red knob is I assume used for hand setting the seconds hand? Jon      
    • According to Cousins site I need to look at document G22 as I think I need an ATGB at 304 but I cant find this size in G22 doc. The last thing I want to do is order the wrong one😳  Unless I cant see the wood for the trees 😆 I could be looking at the wrong style, I assume its classed as Round plastic Armed  https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/wide-ring-gold-atgb
    • When building a new Watch I have tended to use a file to remove the remnants of dial feet that are not needed as many dials come with four feet to accomodate different movements, but this can be a bit messy so now I use this with a great deal more precision as you can use an appropriate bit for the job and keep it very localised.      
×
×
  • Create New...