Jump to content

How "exclusive" was Fortis in the mid 1950's ?


Endeavor

Recommended Posts

Hello all šŸ˜‰

I acquired this little 33mm gold-plated hand-wound Fortis watch. The Venus 180 movement was a non-runner, but as it turned out, all it needed was a good service, a new main-spring and the housing a new crystal. The overall condition isn't bad and the movement seemed untouched.

The newly ordered, supposedly originalĀ  main-spring with a strength of 1.10mm, was too strong. So the old tired 0.95mm spring had to go back in.

Questioning whether I should spent more money on this and buy a fancy 16mm strap, I would like to find out how "exclusive", or in which price-range these Fortis watches would have been in the mid 1950's?

Anybody any idea?

IMG_2904.thumb.jpeg.814a930f11fe9a24956c4f3b0d35e4d9.jpeg

IMG_2905.thumb.jpeg.7c6c0c384a6c40fb1b821466fe94eec0.jpeg

IMG_2907.thumb.jpeg.4269e354fab3de7d4554e0bddf852e32.jpeg

Ā 

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Exclusive" is a modern marketing **BLEEP** term (edit: interesting... must be a British bleeper... Certainly not an American one. Starts with a "w", ends with an "ank". Same in all the bleeps.) . Didn't apply/wasn't a thing in the mid-50s. Depending on your opinion of marketing **BLEEP**, it means nothing now (in my opinion of marketing **BLEEP**, the word "exclusive" is a hard turn off and makes me think of people calling VW Beetles "rare"). Looking at it, it looks like your typical lower-mid tier (50s perspective) stuff I find all day long on my 404 hunts (modern perspective). Venus made decent movements, but that one looks like it's from the bottom end of the catalog; absolutely minimal, and no decoration. 404 would be the "before" classification, not the after though...

If you LIKE the watch, spend whatever you want on it. If you're looking to sell it and recoup costs or something like that, I don't know that the extra cost would necessarily net you a meaningful return. The thing about that end of the market is that the difference between $5 and $100 is often the quality of the listing photos, the asking price, and whether or not someone feels it works for their personal tastes.

Edited by spectre6000
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I suppose this fits "best" in this forum šŸ˜ƒ Im looking for some wall 'art' that doubles as a reference. Specifically Id like to find an ETA 28xx or Sellita exploded movement view. 2824/2836 would be ideal. Have any of you seen/found such a thing - there seem to be a lot of these for specialized movements, and none of them ready to print or to be had as a poster. Why help is appreciated.
    • The diameter is that of the ring - afaik, will have to look it up. ā€œWiggle roomā€œ doesnā€˜t matter as long as the spring length is in the ball park.Ā  Essential sizes of a mainspring are thickness, width and length. Diameter is just a hint if you can push into the barrel directly or will need a winder, it is no property of the spring. Frank
    • Hi @Zendoc, I guess you're like me and you don't have a mainspring winder.Ā  I searched GR mainspring for the ASĀ 1686 mainspring and I now understand your dilemma. The exact one is discontinued. To answer you question more directly, I see two good alternatives for you: a) GR4485 with 1.60 x .10 x 280 x 8.5 ( I guess this one is the one you found): https://www.cousinsuk.com/sku/details/mainsprings-by-list-watch-pocket/GR4485 OR b) GR4477 withĀ 1.60 x .095 x 320 x 9. https://www.cousinsuk.com/sku/details/mainsprings-by-list-watch-pocket/gr4477 Ā  As you know, the the AS 1686 spring is supposed to beĀ 1.60 x .10 x 300 x 9. - both of the above will fit and you'll manage to insert them from the retention ring without need for a mainspring winder (provided you know how to do it). - GR4485 will give you more power (=higher amplitude), but less power reserve (due to shorter length) than the original. - GR4477 will give you the same power reserve as the original. However, a bit less power. Ā  Personally, I'd take GR4477 for two reasons: 1. Well, the power reserve is better. 2. With modern lubricants and modern mainspring metal alloys, you tend to get a higher amplitude anyways. You'd maybe even end up with too much amplitude (knocking) if you go with the original size and use thin synthetic oils-- see discussion here:Ā https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/10580-omega-calt17-help/#comment-248101 Ā  Ā  Ā 
    • Your setup is correct. The smallest diameter of one pulley must correspond with the largest of the other one, else not speed variation. Frank
×
×
  • Create New...