Jump to content

Seiko 6319a , Seiko 2906a amplitude value ?


Recommended Posts

Friends, I have serviced Seiko 6319a and Seiko 2906a. I found the lift angles, but what should the amplitude value be? I am reading values between 190 and 200 degrees. Has anyone dealt with these mechanisms? Thanks.

Edited by Cihan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Cihan said:

I have serviced Seiko 6319a and Seiko 2906a. I found the lift angles, but what should the amplitude value be? I am reading values between 190 and 200 degrees. Has anyone dealt with these mechanisms?

What was the watches doing before you service them and it be nice to have numbers beyond timing in one position. Like dial up or down and then crown down for amplitude and if you to picture a timing machine that would be nice?

Seiko typically does not publish their amplitude they did publish it in one of their documents and it's really low. But typically they should do better than what you're seeing there.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

The Seiko service sheets mention minimum amplitude being 180, which is way too low I feel . Generally after a rebuild, 225-240ish is pretty good. After a few months running they usually settle in the high 240's and can go as high as 270's. in most cases on these Seiko movements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would agree, Seiko amplitudes do seem a little low compared to their Swiss counterparts. 220° is my baseline when just finished rebuild (not based on any science, just seems to be a reasonable number for them) and as @wudce mentions they do better after everything has had a chance to settle in.

Edited by Waggy
Typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, wudce said:

The Seiko service sheets mention minimum amplitude being 180, which is way too low I feel . Generally after a rebuild, 225-240ish is pretty good. After a few months running they usually settle in the high 240's and can go as high as 270's. in most cases on these Seiko movements.

The 180° is with the watch in a vertical position, this is from the 4006 service sheet. 

image.png.f56c8b0fde49ac6a787a6c2c7d1e1cb6.png

So horizontal, that's probably 210-220° ?

You may think it too low, but they, the designers of the movement don't 🤣

I agree with @wudce and @Waggy  about 220 - 240° is fine for these movements. I've spent a long time trying everything to get some movements higher, but they just don't want to.
I have a couple of higher grade movements (23J Lord Matic Cal 5606) which do get 270-280°, but not the bog-standard movements.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I should have said 180 in the vertical position. It's hard to get much better on these older Seiko. Was not long since I did two Seiko 5 with the 6309 movement which both got new mainsprings and both ran in the low 200 in the vertical position. For a 47 year old watch this is not bad.👌

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Doesn’t really work for this, really it needs to be an invite only platform with good moderation. Full disclosure I spent a fair amount of my career as an IT/Network security consultant and am very touchy about what I may release on ‘tinterwebs.   Tom
    • A better solution than having a list that will be compromised for spam would be to have a contact email. In other words an emergency email or even for that matter as separate website for emergency use as opposed to we all list out our names and emails and get spammed to death as there would be almost no way to protect that from bad people.
    • Thanks for the various replies. Here are answers to some of the questions/suggestions  switching the winding shafts doesn’t work because the no7 I need is significantly larger than the bore of the no6. i do have a set of chinese winders too, but as noted they’re movement specific and none fit the bill here.  I don’t want to replace the mainspring a)because I like to keep things as original as possible and b)where I live it’s tough to import parts so i have to wait long periods between supplies   so in conclusion I expect to be handwinding the spring this weekend 
    • From the photo the pallet arm looks as if it has been tampered with the edges are not nice and straight this can cause problems on the banking pins. 
    • Update, I discovered that I could change the mainspring by removing the arbor and sliding it out from between the front and back plates. So I put a new mainspring in. This it what I  get over a 7 day period After winding                                          amplitude is 1 1/2 turns plus a few degrees.                                                                        ie just over 1 1/2 turns. 1 day after winding     gained 1 sec      no amplitude check. 2 days after winding   gained 1 sec      amplitude 1 1/2 turns                                                                                                              i.e. it lost the few extra degrees 3 days afer winding    gained 3 sec     no amplitude check 4 days after winding   gained 5 sec     amplitude 1 1/2 turns                                                                                                               i.e. unchanged 5 days after winding   gained 7 sec     no amplitude check 6 days after winding   gained 16sec    amplitude just over 1 1/4 turns 7 days after winding   gained 24sec   amplitude 1 1/4 turns. From  Based on video inspection, I am getting full pallet lock. So, my data seems to be at odds with the statement "swing of a balance wheel has nothing to do with the rate". However, I have noticed the banking posts are not controlling the lever position on the right side.  I may have some work to do here.
×
×
  • Create New...