Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi guys. 

Recently tackled a 861 Speedmaster mark 2 for a mate and it was running well. 

It came back shortly after a brief wear and I found that the chrono stops at 58 seconds after after 3-5 hours of running. 

I've adjusted the spring pressure on the minute runner lever. Have inspected and cleaned centre wheel, the minute counter finger is in good nick and springs back well. No rust there. 

 

What's next? Really sick of it as I've done all the other chronograph controls. I fitted a NOS chronograph driving wheel as old one was a bit worn and warped. 

 

Should I fit a new centre wheel? 

 

Cheers 

Alex 

Posted

Stopping at just before 60 indicates something with the minute counter. The minute counter wheel needs to be absolutely free, and unlubricated; you should be able to nudge it forward or backward until a tooth just comes over the jumper tip and it should snap into place cleanly under the jumper tension. The jumper itself- clean, totally free, and the jumper spring should be nice and straight with the jumper removed.

 

The sliding gear should be set so that a tooth on its wheel points directly at the center of the chonograph runner. If it's off a little bit counter clockwise the finger on the runner can jam (though hard to happen on this caliber).

 

One thing I've encountered on this caliber is someone in the past screwed down the chronograph bridge without checking that the intermediate minute counter wheel has its pivot in its hole. That wheel is unjeweled; if you screw the bridge down in that condition (and don't break the pivot) it can make a divot in the bushing, sometimes slightly closing the hole. This can cause enough friction to to cause the minute counter wheel to not snap cleanly tooth to tooth with the jumper, or, even stop the watch with the chronograph running.

 

Have a look through, and try to post some clean close up pics of the chrono mechanism.

  • Like 3
Posted

I'm sure you have considered this, but I had a similar situation with a non-chronometer watch (so maybe it's not applicable in this situation?), where it turned out (at least this was my conclusion) that the barrel arbor hole was too slack (and this could be seen upon closer inspection) and lead to the barrel binding up. At high wind the spring force could overcome this additional friction/binding but as the spring wound down it had less and less energy to overcome this problem and it eventually stopped. I fixed the slack in the plate and the error did not re-appear, so some circumstantial evidence at least that my working theory was correct. It's a relatively easy check and therefore easy to rule in or out - just remove the wind from the spring and see if the ratchet wheel can 'rock' back and forwards - I learned this from Kalle Slaap of Chronoglide who always does this as part of his initial disassembly checks. Anyhow, something to try and (hopefully) remove from the suspects list 🙂.

Just thinking it may also be worth re-checking all the jewels for cracks or chips, but this would require a full disassembly of course.

 

Posted (edited)

Another question; what's the amplitude of the watch with and without the chronograph engaged? It seems, according to your information, that it runs for 3-5 hrs and then it stops with the seconds recording hand just at 58seconds, just at the point whereby the running works experience an additional load.

In simple terms; are the running works powerful enough to drive the chronograph or is it running out of steam after 3-5 hrs and can't bear the additional load anymore when it has to drive the minutes-recording wheel at 58 seconds?

What's the amplitude when you disengage the chronograph after it has stopped running (3-5hrs) and what's the amplitude at that point, after you zeroed the chronograph, engage it again and measure the amplitude between the 0-58 seconds?

You can also visually observe the amplitude of the balance wheel at the moment when it has to drive the minutes-recording wheel.

Perhaps there is nothing "wrong" with the chronograph. Perhaps it's a combination of a "heavy" running chronograph, and a not strong enough running work, both in desperate need of a proper service?

Which leads back to JohnR725 question above plus; what was the complain / reason when/that you got it?

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I believe @nickelsilver has a setup like that.
    • I posted pictures earlier in this thread. My lathe and mill are two separate instruments. I think I have seen examples of putting a milling head on a lathe bed...but not certain.
    • Timex Camper, September 1994, new to me. Strap is an old perlon with "Germany" in script etched into the resin on the tail end. Not Horlon or Eulit I believe. History unknown, running strong, losing less than a minute a day. Goals for this: Wear it a ton! Buy crystal lift, clean out the gunk around the ring and under the crystal Eventually swap into a stainless steel case. I've seen a member who has swapped a Timex mechanical movement into the Timex J.Crew quartz field watch case.
    • One of the problems we would have with a watchmaker's lathe is they were made over considerable span of time and manufacturing in the early days probably wasn't as good as it was today. Then if you look at the older catalogs typically it was just the head a few collets and something to rest graver on. So basically a basic lathe with over time things acquired but acquired things may or may not fit. Order today you purchase a used lathe that all kinds of nifty bits and pieces from a seller that acquired from? This would come back to that the basic watchmaker's lathe was used for basic watchmaking like turning things with a hand graver. Then limited indexing is fine because you can make things like stems Which don't need a whole bunch indexing   In the link above the word vector is mentioned and at the link below you can purchase one. Then of course you're going to need the motor that's a little bit extra for the price. https://www.hswalsh.com/product/lathe-vector-watchmakers-48-collets-hl11. That you're going to need some bonus parts like these found this picture online show the classic way of classic gear cutting.   The lathe could have a much bigger indexing disk but it has to be mounted close to the edge. Otherwise you're going to have a whole bunch of smaller disks like this which I think has notches rather than holes. Then as wonderful as these pictures look actually cutting a gear with this is not entirely fun. Look at all is belts all pulling on things and this is a watchmaker's lathe lightweight with lots of bits and pieces attached. It would make more sense if you actually cut a gear with something like this and it tends to be it's not really the best way to do it looks nice on paper but it is not the best way to go. Reality for cutting watch parts would be a bigger machine is much better. Than getting rid of all those belts and pulleys also good. Here is an interesting channel I would've liked of found a different video but this was nice and short if you look at his video as he uses a stepping motor and worm gear assembly for the indexing plate. In this particular video it gets attached to the lathe at about one minute and seven seconds and it looks like it's hiding looks like he has a Sherline. I do know he's had other stuff you'll just have to go through his videos to find it. Then at about one minute and 22 seconds you find out if you set up things appropriately. It's always bad we end up with half a tooth at the very end. Then you will note big lathe yes he's getting a big gear but you could easily cut a watch gear with the setup. And it definitely way more stable than a watchmaker's lathe.         Oh here's a company they been in business since 1911 http://www.fwderbyshireinc.com/  
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
×
×
  • Create New...