Jump to content

Best way to open mainspring barrels ?


Recommended Posts

I've always opened barrels by pushing down on the edges until the top pops off.  I'm aware that this can lead to bowing of the lid, and I've recently had a couple where the lid was bowed out.

This should be easy to fix with a staking set, but I've found it fiddly to get the lid absolutely flat - and they are soft, I put a circular ring on one from a punch.
If not perfectly flat, the end shake is wrong, and the lid doesn't clip in properly. 

Maybe it's just my inability with the staking set, but it would be better to avoid bent lids in the first place.

So the question is, how to remove lids without pushing the barrel. I remember someone ( @nickelsilver ?)  mentioned a sharp strike was one technique.

Striking what with what - I guess the arbor with a little hammer whilst the barrel is in the palm ?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do a sharp smack on the barrel arbor for clock barrels, unless they have a good slot for a screwdriver, but even then sometimes the smack works better.

 

For watch barrels I press on the teeth (unless there's a notch for a screwdriver, but even then...). Rarely an issue. But, I read on another forum where a highly regarded pro uses canned compressed air. He shoots it right where the arbor comes out, and apparently enough gets in to pop the cap (keep it captured!), with no distortion ever. Been meaning to pick up a can and try.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

For watch barrels I press on the teeth (unless there's a notch for a screwdriver, but even then...). Rarely an issue. But, I read on another forum where a highly regarded pro uses canned compressed air. He shoots it right where the arbor comes out, and apparently enough gets in to pop the cap (keep it captured!), with no distortion ever. Been meaning to pick up a can and try.

I think I'll give that technique a miss - I've enough with springs pinging around 🤣

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The diameter is that of the ring - afaik, will have to look it up. “Wiggle room“ doesn‘t matter as long as the spring length is in the ball park.  Essential sizes of a mainspring are thickness, width and length. Diameter is just a hint if you can push into the barrel directly or will need a winder, it is no property of the spring. Frank
    • Hi @Zendoc, I guess you're like me and you don't have a mainspring winder.  I searched GR mainspring for the AS 1686 mainspring and I now understand your dilemma. The exact one is discontinued. To answer you question more directly, I see two good alternatives for you: a) GR4485 with 1.60 x .10 x 280 x 8.5 ( I guess this one is the one you found): https://www.cousinsuk.com/sku/details/mainsprings-by-list-watch-pocket/GR4485 OR b) GR4477 with 1.60 x .095 x 320 x 9. https://www.cousinsuk.com/sku/details/mainsprings-by-list-watch-pocket/gr4477   As you know, the the AS 1686 spring is supposed to be 1.60 x .10 x 300 x 9. - both of the above will fit and you'll manage to insert them from the retention ring without need for a mainspring winder (provided you know how to do it). - GR4485 will give you more power (=higher amplitude), but less power reserve (due to shorter length) than the original. - GR4477 will give you the same power reserve as the original. However, a bit less power.   Personally, I'd take GR4477 for two reasons: 1. Well, the power reserve is better. 2. With modern lubricants and modern mainspring metal alloys, you tend to get a higher amplitude anyways. You'd maybe even end up with too much amplitude (knocking) if you go with the original size and use thin synthetic oils-- see discussion here: https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/10580-omega-calt17-help/#comment-248101      
    • Your setup is correct. The smallest diameter of one pulley must correspond with the largest of the other one, else not speed variation. Frank
    • Haven't seen them before. 
×
×
  • Create New...