Jump to content

Mainspring


Willow

Recommended Posts

 

40 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

Hi Guys  find attached pages from Laurie Pennman (Master clockmaker) and his calculations for the mainspring acommodation as regards to the barrel fitting…

Exactly what @praezis explained 🙂

Edited by Kalanag
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi. As a rule of thumb Iwould say so as the spring needs space to operate. But the actual data for springs in barrels is calculated as Lauri Pennmans formula in his book for exactness and confirmed by Prazeis (Frank) who also came to the same conclusion with his calculations.  So in conclusion Pennman/Prazeis are correct and De Charles theory is just a guide.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As promised hear is a photo of the spring in the barrel you can see how tight it is, now the question is when i order a new spring do i get a thinner spring, shorter spring, even a different height spring or all three, thanks for your patience

20230204_122242.jpg

20230204_122253.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks a little long and from the angel of the barrel looks as if it could be a little higher. From what I can recall the springs in these movement are very strong so a little less strength should be fine. Don't have it to high you do not want it rubbing the inside of the barrel cap.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Kalanag said:

As @praezis an Laurie Pennman calculated correctly the rule of thumb should be 1/4 instead of 1/3

I was referring to the guideline for testing if a spring is "set".

 

2 hours ago, Willow said:

As promised hear is a photo of the spring in the barrel you can see how tight it is, now the question is when i order a new spring do i get a thinner spring, shorter spring, even a different height spring or all three, thanks for your patience

The spring looks a little long. I'm wondering if it would be possible to cut off 2 or 3 coils then anneal and reshape the cut end.

But looking at the coil, it should be able to take a lot more than "two or three" winds. I think the problem lies elsewhere.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I searched my library for mainspring rules.

None of the celebreties mentioned in this thread invented those rules themselves. They were taught it and passed that knowledge in their books.

In fact some old books mention such 1/3 rule while the exact dimensioning of mainsprings was already known and published for a long time. Seems it was a rule of thumb among craftsmen who were more busy with file and lathe than with books.

The rule for a maximum of barrel revolutions that determines the optimal length of a mainspring was published by Rozé in 19th century. Claudius Saunier mentions this in his comprehensive textbook (paragraphs 1211-1216) from 1861. I also found this rule in books from 1902 and 1923. So Mr. de Carle could have known better. 

Nevertheless a watch or clock with a too long mainspring will run its 24 hours and so supporters of the 1/3 rule were contented.

Frank

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This seems to be complicated case... We have many variables here and we need to exclude some of them to make some progress. We have plots that show amplitude variations, but we don't know if this variations are significant, as they can be 'amplified' or 'smoothed' by the software. So, some observation of the amplitude by eye will be of help. Then, if we really have not isochronical work, then the main reason for this would be the hairspring being not 'linear'. And not linear may be sometimes not only because 'touching', but because bad hairsping material structure. Some of the advanced watchmakers claim that repairing badly bent hairspring is useless, because this springs will never be isochronic again.  Well, my own observations are that such thing happens, but not in all the cases and it depends on the case if the result is acceptable or not. I will not suppose here that this spring has been repaired, but it has some strange behavior watching at it's work. It will be good if it is possible to test the movement with another balance or thest the balance on another movement...
    • The more common Jewel hole diameters are from about 0.07mm to 0.50mm. Those are the sizes in the Seitz jewel gauge tool.
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • OK, several things to say here. The thought thay if with the old spring the movement works 16 hours, then replacing the spring will solve that - is totally wrong. With a new spring the movement probably will work for 17 hours. The power reserve is practically not reduced when the spring gets weak with the age. It is rather something wrong with the movement. As You worked on the hairspring, we need to  confirm that it is OK now before everything else. So, thake the lever out and do the free oscillations test. What is the result? I expect numbers, not only 'it is good' or 'it is not good'. Then, this is no jewels pin lever movement, so this is not unusual to have not well regulated or even worn escapement, this is the main reason that this kind of watches doesn't work as long and reliable as the jeweled escapement ones. You can find many of them with no wear at the crown and case, and this is because they stopped working normally pritty soon after purchase.
    • Welcome 🙂 Inherited watches are very tricky. Some of them, or all, do have sentimental value, perhaps not to you but perhaps to others in the family. Ruining them doesn't make you popular. Start on innocent watches who do no harm, not to your wallet nor to others 😉 BTW; for in the future it would be helpful to others to mention your location in your profile. Success 🤗  
×
×
  • Create New...