Jump to content

Removal of second hand from Tissot watch


Recommended Posts

Hello, my name is Sean and I just joined today.   I have an anniversary watch from work that I wore for the first time last week.  After a couple days, I noticed the second hand was not attached to spindle (name ?).  I thought it would be best to remove it. I watched a couple videos and performed the following:

1.  Removed back plate. Two screws were rolling around inside.  See picture, I believe they came from the holes at 8:00 and 2:00 o’clock.

2.  I was able to remove time adjustment knob.

3. At this point I expected the whole inside part to fall out, but it didn’t.  The brass colored interior assembly rotates.

4.  There are two “fasteners” at 10:00 and 4:00 o’clock, but they look odd, when I zoom in on the picture.

I am stuck.  Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.  Thank you very much.

Sean

 

 

06337E04-0BE5-4461-AB9D-3C0EEF13CEDC.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As it was an anniversary watch from your employer, could you not hand it back and say is this all you think of my loyal service, assuming you still work for them 😉 loose screws and a detached hand from new is not really acceptable is it.

As others have said its a front loader if you insist on a DIY repair, I would put the two loose screws back in before removing the front, that way the movement will stay in place and it will be easier to handle whilst trying to refit the second hand, assuming it can be refited and it's not fallen off because it's not possible to get a tight fit on it's pinion.

If its an option I would take it back for a replacement.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As suggested by Paul, put the handsetting stem (knob) back and screw down the caseback. Hand it over to your boss nad ask for a repair / new one....

If you wanna do it yourself, check if you can remove the spacer aound the (brass) movement.

If it's not a spacer and is fixed at the case (I cannot see it cleary at your picture), than you have to remove the bezel or crystal from the front. You need special tools to do it. You'll  experiance that this is a costly hobby 😉

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you paul80, Hanspeter, and watchweasol for follow ups to lexacat comments.  I posted the pictures lexacat requested about 8 hours ago, but they have not been approved yet.   It was a 35 year anniversary watch,  I like my job, but this is par for the course with service gifts.  It’s ok, it gives me yet another thing  to complain about at work.  I would like to see if I can do this myself.  Sounds like there are some informational videos in the forums I can check.  I would like to at least learn the proper names for major components.

Thank you all,

Sean

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weird that the photos need approval, I wasn't aware that's a thing. Can you let us know the model number of the watch? It should be stamped on the caseback somewhere, otherwise let us know what details are written on the movement (can't quite read it in your original picture).

It's likely your watch has an acrylic crystal that can be removed with a crystal lift (they aren't super expensive), or the crystal is held in with a retaining ring. If there is an obvious ring demarking a separation of the front of the watch from the case, you should be able to remove the crystal with a simple case back opener by gently prising that ring up.

 

EDIT: wait, I see the pictures now, you can definitely use a case opener to separate the crystal retaining ring from the case.

You might need a case back press tool to fit it back on though. Those can be had for cheap on eBay or whatever if you only need it the once. 

Edited by lexacat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lexacat thank you very much.  I was able to get the crystal off then gently pry off the second hand (it pretty much fell off).  I pressed the crystal back on.  I am able to set time and date.  I attached a photo with the removed second hand.

Unfortunately, the watch no longer works.  I thought I put the battery back in correctly, but I will have to check and probably get a new battery.  Can’t help but think if I had not tried going in through the back, all would be well.

I really appreciate the time you took to help me through this.

Sean

16428C35-1AE4-42A5-AEC3-F37EA10F711B.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/22/2023 at 12:59 AM, SPB said:

Hello, my name is Sean and I just joined today.   I have an anniversary watch from work that I wore for the first time last week.  After a couple days, I noticed the second hand was not attached to spindle (name ?).  I thought it would be best to remove it. I watched a couple videos and performed the following:

1.  Removed back plate. Two screws were rolling around inside.  See picture, I believe they came from the holes at 8:00 and 2:00 o’clock.

2.  I was able to remove time adjustment knob.

3. At this point I expected the whole inside part to fall out, but it didn’t.  The brass colored interior assembly rotates.

4.  There are two “fasteners” at 10:00 and 4:00 o’clock, but they look odd, when I zoom in on the picture.

I am stuck.  Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.  Thank you very much.

Sean

 

 

06337E04-0BE5-4461-AB9D-3C0EEF13CEDC.jpeg

I hate to say it but in your first pic which shows the movement there appears to be scratch mark running across the cover plate and the bottom end of the coil. If it is a scratch, and if it does go across the coil, the movement is probably dead. If this is the case then the most cost effective solution could well be a complete replacement movement.

The photo isn't that clear but it looks like it is an ETA movement but I can't discern the number. Can you get a clearer pic or tell us what the number is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi I increased the picture size and what Marc saw looks very much like a scratch and at the lower end of the coil there are two light marks which would indicate the case knife has clipped the coil and it’s now open circuit hence the reason it’s not working.  Better / clearer pictures of the logo and calibre needed for identification.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This makes much more sense now, the oil is withdrawing itself to make as little contact with the epilame as possible. Same principle as wax on a car creates a hyrophobic surface that makes the cohesive properties of water molecules pull together.  The water beads run off only when under the influence of gravity but still remain cohesively beaded up. And as mentioned earlier a pivot would keep the oil in place on a cap jewel.  Epilame on an escapement would be a different scenario, there is nothing to hold the oil in position if gravity tugs at the bead to move, plus the escape teeth pull the oil about Maybe this is why its suggested to run the watch for a short while to remove the epilame to make two oleophobic surfaces either side of the oil, creating a ring of fire 🔥 around it 😅
    • As with every skill it watchmaking, it takes practice. Notice at the top of the document it says, "Practical work - 40 hours".  I can get the balance wheels 'close enough' to flat, but never seem to get them perfect. Same with gear wheels. Guess I need more practice.
    • Has it got a beat adjustment on the platform or is it a fixed hairspring? in short what you are looking at to get it just about in beat is to get the roller jewel sitting dead centre between the banking pins. So remove the platform and take of the pallet fork and escape wheel to give you clear line of site, sit the platform with the balance in place and with it level look between the banking pins and see if the roller jewel is sitting between them, if it is nice and central its there or there abouts in beat, if its not the the position of the pinned end of the hairspring needs to be adjusted to move the roller jewel into the correct position, thats why I asked if it has an adjustment on the platform or not, if it has its an easier job. 
    • I've managed to adjust it. I'm going to try and explain it as well as I can with my limited horology knowledge but I hope it helps someone in the future. There is a cam to the right of the front plate as shown in the picture. As the clock ticks along, the pin indicated in the gear comes around and slots into one of the silencer cam gaps, turning the cam. The pin completes a full rotation in 2 hours. To adjust the cam to start at the right time set the clock to just before 7. I did 6:45. Then I turned the silencer cam anticlockwise, which spins freely, until it pushed the silencer lever up and was placed just before the drop. Just before the 7AM indicated in the picture. All I then had to do was progress the hands to 7-7:15which made the pin slot into the silencer cam gap and turn the cam so the lever comes down again, unsilencing the clock. That was it. If anyone comes across this issue again I'd be happy to assist. Thanks again to everyone that helped. Hey Transporter! Thanks a lot for the reply. That was a really good explanation and I'm sure it would have made my troubleshooting a lot less painful haha. I'm sure someone will find it useful in the future. Thank you again for taking the time to try and help me out with this.
    • Now I'm completely confused, it would appear that the epilame  is oleophobic  as @Marc states: This oleophobic  behavior can be seen as beading of the droplet (as above) which stops the oil spreading which is supported by what we observe on treated/untreated cap stones (for example), but as @VWatchie states this should make the drops more mobile and is supported by the literature:   A review on control of droplet motion based on wettability modulation principles design strategies recent progress and applications.pdf   However the whole point is that we have less mobile oil so an oleophobic  would see to be the opposite of what we want. In fact this beading and high mobility are desirable properties in things like smart phone covers, see below.  I am fairly sure that epilame doesn't make the droplets more mobile, so maybe its a strange coating with dual properties that are both oleophobic (beading) and cohesive/adhesive resulting in low mobility?? This may explain the high price??  
×
×
  • Create New...