Jump to content

Barrel bridge not fitting snugly back onto movement plate


Recommended Posts

I have a pocket watch that I'm trying to fix up.  I noticed some sideshake in the barrel bridge, so before reassembling it fully, I staked the pivot closed and broached it open.  Pretty easy, no surprises.  But when doing a test fit of the bridge back onto the mainplate, I noticed that it doesn't want to fit back together.  There's a good half-millimeter gap between the bottom of the bridge and the top of the movement plate, and I don't know where it is originating from. 

My first guess was that the hole in the barrel bridge was closed too much and it's pushing the barrel down.  I broached it open a little more and that hasn't fixed it.  And if I remove the bridge and just test fit the barrel arbor into the bridge, it fits perfectly.  Then I thought maybe the bottom of the barrel was fouling against the movement plate, but the arbor has a shoulder on it to prevent that from happening.

The barrel has a press-fit ratchet wheel with a square hole on it, which I thought maybe wasn't pressed down enough, causing the top of the ratchet wheel to foul against the underside of the barrel bridge, but there is still a gap in there, so that's not it either.

I have no idea what's causing it.  I have attached some teardown photos as well as current photos.

IMG_20230115_143143.jpg

IMG_20230115_143653.jpg

IMG_20230117_193353.jpg

IMG_20230117_193358.jpg

IMG_20230117_193411.jpg

IMG_20230117_193423.jpg

IMG_20230117_193505.jpg

IMG_20230117_193646.jpg

Edited by GregG
Fix typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any time you're having a problem putting a bridge on its best to remove everything under the bridge and just try the bridge itself to make sure you not having a problem there. A lot of times the pins in the plate the steady pins are really tight you want to verify whether that's what's going on or whether there's something else going on.

10 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

The hole closing punch can distort the plate and affect endshake.

Then hole closing can seem simple and easy but you can end up with interesting issues. Like for instance of the hole was oval in shape and you close it, is now no longer centered.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

Try removing the barrel arbor from the barrel and fitting just that onto the plate and see if the barrel bridge can seat fully.

The hole closing punch can distort the plate and affect endshake.

Good call.  I tried fitting just the arbor, and it wouldn't budge, so it's not the barrel itself.  I continue to broach the hole open, and the plate fits on almost perfectly and the arbor is free to spin.  Though I did have to broach it quite a bit.  Sideshake is no longer as good as it was after initially staking, but better than it was before staking.  I reassembled the watch dry to make sure everything else is still good.  The watch is running, but with a low amplitude.  Unfortunately there are a few variables here.  Perhaps my staking/broaching job wasn't great, or there's another pivot that needs it, or the fact that it's dry, or the mainspring is tired.

2 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Any time you're having a problem putting a bridge on its best to remove everything under the bridge and just try the bridge itself to make sure you not having a problem there. A lot of times the pins in the plate the steady pins are really tight you want to verify whether that's what's going on or whether there's something else going on.

Then hole closing can seem simple and easy but you can end up with interesting issues. Like for instance of the hole was oval in shape and you close it, is now no longer centered.

I will try fitting just the bridge when I have time.  Though this is perhaps the dozenth time I've done it and never had an issue such as this.  I've had it where the hole is simply too small, and broached it open a bit and it eventually fit like a glove, but I don't think I've ever distorted it badly.

44 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

Hi as mentioned any punching hole closing etc can and will distort the bridge if not done correctly. Also looking at the picture of the barrel the cap does not look to be seated squarely might just be the picture but worth a check.    Cheers

I think it's just that the front of the picture is in focus, but the back isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here are the pics of the bridge. Looks correct, but as soon as I screw on the rotor, the watch stops. Video here: https://1drv.ms/v/s!ArG5E62RGctxjokY5ws85BzuJLVakA   Pics. Might have figured it out. I have been working on this watch for a while and since I got it as a non runner in a terrible shape, there was no guarantee that parts were proper. I think the main screw that was used on the rotor was too long, so it was stopping the main train. As soon as I fished out a much shorter and larger headed screw, things were good again. Please celebrate with me.  
    • One-dip or naphtha should be safe, but are you sure it isn't magnetized?  I would also check that.  Although, if that balance is from an Elgin 760 0r 761, I would think it would have a hairspring of non-magnetic alloy.
    • Hi, Is there a spell check function available when you are posting ? Regards CJ
    • Hi John I just did a Seiko Lord-Matic a front loader without a split stem, I used a crystal lift to remove it, although I had to have it that tight I though I was going to break the lift before the crystal would budge. So I decided that the press would be a better option as I think crystals with tension rings resist a lot of compressing. I used a crystal press to repalce it and the bezel with no issues, obviuosly a different watch to the Omega. I just took my time and kept inspecting the installation progress bit by bit Regards CJ
    • Hello All, I’m replacing the crystal in an Omega Dynamic, # 165.039, which houses a cal 552, installed through the front of the case. The replacement Sterncreuz crystal is, like the original, with tension ring. I removed the crystal using a compressed air technique to pop it out.  (I have a crystal lift, but I’m always fearful of marking the crystal edges and so avoid using it as much as possible). Now to the replacement -  any tips on putting the crystal back in?  Am I obliged to using my dreaded crystal lift to complete the task, or how about a crystal press?  I’ve put lots of crystals in using a press, but never with the movement in the watch. The thought of using one with a front-loader makes me very nervous, with the fully assembled watch sitting under the press. How would more experienced folks proceed here? Any advice, gratefully received… John Down Under…
×
×
  • Create New...