Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, GuyMontag said:

Perhaps try increasing the tension that the sweep seconds tension spring is providing on the sweep second pinion. I've never personally seen "backlash" that the tension spring is supposed to control, but what I've read makes it sound like this.

 

EDIT: was the tension spring broken? It looks like it in the movement photo but in the parts tray it doesn't

tension.jpg.560b2ce35d98948f15e0e96c0b89a11c.jpg

that is the way it is supposed to be, i..e, the spring has a notch. 

Regarding the giddy up problem, I've experienced the same condition on a 10BPAC.  In that case, I had a very slightly loose sweep second hand that was losing contact with the pinion. 

You have to work your way back in the chain from the sweep second hand then the pinion etc to find the problem.

Have you tried another sweep second hand?

Have you checked the pinion to make sure it is true and not bent? 

Does it always do it in the same spot? Check a full rotation between the wheel and the pinion and watch to see where the hesitation happens at that level.

Does it do this in multiple positions?

Have you observed that the sweep second hand driver wheel and pinion are close to level and meshing with no wobble?

And so forth down the chain.

 

Edited by Levine98
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
10 hours ago, GuyMontag said:

was the tension spring broken?

No, it's just the lighting in the picture. There is definitely good tension on the pinion (thank you for putting the right word to it for me!).

 

3 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Do you know what was rusting in the watch?

Much of the keyless works were rusted, but since I have two movements I used the parts from the not-rusted one. I just took the nicer-looking dial, which happened to be from the rusty movement.

 

3 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

can you see the bushing?

I can, and it looks very worn to me, but since both movements look the same I didn't want to assume it was incorrect right away.

 

I will take the second hand pinion spring off and check it for tension again, but I did notice something else this morning that's probably important. When I pull the crown out to setting position and turn it to set the time, the balance stops spinning--but only when I turn the crown clockwise. If I turn it counterclockwise, the balance continues running.

Also when I turn the crown clockwise, I see the seconds hand rotate counter-clockwise a few degrees.

I've never seen that before, so I assume it's significant to our diagnosis here.

2 hours ago, Levine98 said:

Have you tried another sweep second hand?

I have, and it looks the same.

 

2 hours ago, Levine98 said:

Have you checked the pinion to make sure it is true and not bent? 

After you suggested it, yes, and it looks dead straight.

 

2 hours ago, Levine98 said:

Have you observed that the sweep second hand driver wheel and pinion are close to level and meshing with no wobble?

Yes, after removing and re-seating the driver wheel.

 

2 hours ago, Levine98 said:

Does it always do it in the same spot?

It did seem to be worst around 4-6 o'clock, but after removing the pinion and reseating things it seems to be running smoothly.

The problem with the balance stopping when I set the time persists, though, so I'm not ready to button it up yet.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, ManSkirtBrew said:

I will take the second hand pinion spring off and check it for tension again, but I did notice something else this morning that's probably important. When I pull the crown out to setting position and turn it to set the time, the balance stops spinning--but only when I turn the crown clockwise. If I turn it counterclockwise, the balance continues running.

Also when I turn the crown clockwise, I see the seconds hand rotate counter-clockwise a few degrees.

I've never seen that before, so I assume it's significant to our diagnosis here.

one of the things you're seeing is specifically the stopping. If you set a watch and depending upon the particular watch and how tight the Canon pinion is you can stop the watch. Basically if you can rotate and cancel out the force the mainspring the watch.. The same as if you turn in the other direction carefully you can kick the amplitude up a little bit it's not really an issue because you're setting the watch

the problem would be as the amount of play between the gear driving the pinion. That's why the spring is there. Gear trains tend to produce pull stations up our that you normally wouldn't see you look at how that gear meshes with opinion you'll see that it might actually be a position where it's not actually touching at all and in that moment the secondhand can move back and forth as why the spring is there to just make sure it doesn't flop around in the in between positions. It's a common problem for that style of design which is why they have Springs. Also in manufacturing if the gear and pinion were sized properly. also if the poster gear rides on is bent conceivably it may go in and out of meshing properly and you may see it worse in some positions

Alan I think I might have mentioned it up above but if I didn't make sure that there is no lubrication on the spring. As it's supposed to be holding something in place and lubrication would make it more slippery and then your hand flop around a little bit.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Alan I think I might have mentioned it up above but if I didn't make sure that there is no lubrication on the spring. As it's supposed to be holding something in place and lubrication would make it more slippery and then your hand flop around a little bit.

I did make sure of this when I reassembled, and it seems to be behaving well now.

I just ordered a new center wheel, but at least it was only $14. If there's a significant difference in the fit of the seconds pinion shaft, I'll swap it out.

But for now I might just put it together and wear it for a bit 🙂

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

To make sure you have the correct amount of tension on the sweep second pinion, run the watch without the sweep second pinion or brake spring in place and note the amplitude after at least 48 hours after lubricating. Let's say it is 300 degrees amplitude. Then fit the sweep second pinion and brake spring and set the tension so it is just enough to stop the flutter/backlash of the second hand, but not so much tension to reduce the amplitude by more than 10 to 15 degrees amplitude. That is the Goldilocks point. No flutter, but not a ridiculous drop in amplitude. If the spring is dented or damaged, that will decrease the amplitude radically, making you think it is something else, so make sure that isn't the case. Any bigger drop than 20 degrees using this method, then you need to backtrack the problem, such as a bent sweep second pinion, bad lubrication, over lubrication, dirty pinion leaves, too much side shake, etc...

Also, I always advise to fit a new mainspring, so you can rule out any power output problems because you aren't using an old spring.

Edited by Jon
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, ManSkirtBrew said:

Thanks again to everyone for the advice. It's running well now, and really looks great. I'll keep an eye on it and see how it runs on my wrist.

20230509_183055(1).thumb.jpg.47ef68fdfb060fc6102d824e608d9988.jpg

20230509_184111(1).thumb.jpg.c3cb0d59b2f0a40e2bf11b66f8c01038.jpg

Wow, that’s a beauty—well done.  

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Excellent info, thank you! So when you say "conforms to the standard" does that mean, for example, that parts are interchangeable between brands and ages, or that you could use accessories built for that 110-year old one on a newer one that was built in the 1990s? Also, thank you for taking the time to answer my questions and your patience.
    • It was first a brand, but became a standardized style. So you will find some older lathes actually marked "Webster Whitcomb" and many other makers who built WW lathes conforming to the same dimensions for spindle height, bed shape, attachment setup, collet size and design. https://www.lathes.co.uk/derbyshire/ So when someone mentions a WW lathe today, they are talking about any lathe that conforms to the standard, which could be a 110 year old American made lathe or a European made lathe from the 1960s or something else.
    • Hi guys, just a little thank you for the CLOCKBARN site in America.  I purchased a TIMETRAX APMLIFIER to help with setting clocks in beat from CLOCKBARN it arrived on time and when tested worked ok.  A week later I had occasion to need it again, this time nothing the unit was dead. Checked out batteries , probes etc , nothing.    I messaged CLOCKBARN  to this effect.  I got a prompt reply that he would send a replacement which duly arrived today and having tested it it’s ok.  So I can recommend the site should you need to use it. The person,persons who run it are genuine guys.  So thank you CLOCKBARN  for your excellent service.
    • Hi there! You have learned how professional watchmakers feel about Timex. It is very difficult to find one willing to work on them, for a few reasons: 1) a lot of them wrongly believe Timex cannot be serviced, are riveted together. This is a myth. 2) when serviced, they still cannot meet the performance standards of jeweled mechanical watches (-20sec/day is good enough for a Timex) 3) customers are unwilling to pay the watchmaker's hourly bench rates because the watches are worth very little The service manual for the M33 is available at https://heritage1854.com/m33 but you also need the M32 and M31 manuals because they build on each other (31 is the base, 32 has date, 33 has day and date) https://heritage1854.com/m31 https://heritage1854.com/m32 A stuck date changeover can be due to a missing, bent or broken detent spring (part 2576 in the manual) or the date wheel (2556) got stuck or separated from its post, or maybe disengaged from the hour wheel. With a little confidence, these are not difficult to repair and parts are pretty much interchangeable with any other Timex from the same era having the same features. So it is very easy to find inexpensive spares in the form of junk watches (don't bother trying to search for individual spare parts). My recommendation would be to find a junk Timex with an M25 (older manual wind with date) and practice a little with it. Follow the service manual from the same website. The automatics are a bit more difficult to work on but once you get a feel for how they fit together, you can make an attempt at your automatic and you would be able to use many spare parts from the M25 if necessary. To work with most Timex movements, you do not need a lot of tools. Just one screwdriver, 1.4mm is a good size, tweezers, and hand levers to remove the hands plus hand pusher tools to replace them. Of course if you want to do a full cleaning and restoration more is needed. But to get it apart and diagnose, only minimal tools.
    • I do indeed have some programming and electronics know-how. 3 decades writing code for a living, and playing with microcontrollers as a hobby. 🙂 It helps with my actual living of being a voice actor because I can maintain my own equipment- no one around to replace the caps or the tube in an obscure botique mic that isn't made or supported any longer. Also saves money maintaining and cleaning my own interfaces and mixers when they develop problems in the faders and such. That said... I do have a question that, I'm sure, will betray my ignorance about certain areas that I have yet to fill in. I understand a "WW" lathe is a "Webster Whitcomb", but from what I understand that is a style of lathe and not a brand, correct? If someone would be willing to clarify and maybe expand on the terminology, it would be helpful so I can better understand the advice being given and know what I need to look into to further my knowledge. For example, a Sherline mill would appear to be either a separate piece of gear or an attachment/expansion to their smaller lathe. When you say you have a WW lathe and a sherline mill, can you say exactly what devices you have? Thank you! (I just realized I have a few Raspberry Pis and some Arduinos of various form factors around here I could probably put to good use in a scenario like you describe above).  
×
×
  • Create New...