Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I`m a complete novice with watches having just attempted to tackle an issue with a Tissot Seastar (with 781-1 movement) purchased recently. Initially the watch was keeping reasonably accurate time, and then started to gain hours in a day due to a blob of lubrication on the balance spring. It was taken to a watch repairer who removed the offending oil; the watch then kept good time for a week or so then stopped. It was returned to the repairer only for him to say - after leaving it with him for inspection - that the hairspring was twisted....hmm. Apologies for the history, but I wanted to demonstrate that the watch had been working properly in the past.

Having viewed the excellent Watch Repair Channel videos to a point where I felt confident in tackling the problem, I decided to attempt an inspection/repair myself. Firstly I bought an identical movement (for spares/repair) from ebay, which had the essential balance assembly including the hairspring which appears to be in good order. If the original watch indeed has a twisted hairspring, then a straight swap from the spare seemed logical; however on careful examination, the Incabloc`s brass lyre shaped clasp (pic 1, I`m pointing to the bit that`s remaining)) showed it to be broken in two parts, so my first question is please, how does one remove the clasp? ( I want to take the good one from the original watch to the spare`s). Secondly, in Mark`s video on `How to align the hairspring to set the watch in beat`, he demonstrates the re-positioning  of the hairspring on the balance wheel to correctly locate the impulse jewel in-between the banking pins. I can`t see either of the items on the 871-1 movement with the balance assembly in place so I marked the balance wheel to show the position of the jewel and also the centre of the banking pins on the watch`s top plate, (pic2. ), and as can be seen, the two were slightly out of alignment.  I found though, if I moved the part that retains the end of the spring, (pic3), it would align  the mark on the balance wheel to the corresponding mark on the top plate. (Apologies for the lack of correct part identification). Is this method permissible? Lastly, the `lever` I`m pointing to in pic4, is this the co**BLEEP** `advance/retard` adjustment lever? The fine adjuster (which adjusts the co**BLEEP** one a small amount) is shown below it.

                                                                                    Thanks for your patience!           

          

post-1269-0-15131200-1436620578_thumb.jp

post-1269-0-76884300-1436620601_thumb.jp

post-1269-0-50289600-1436620629_thumb.jp

post-1269-0-28891800-1436620654_thumb.jp

Posted

Hi,

If you are pointing to your spare movement it would probably be easier for you to remove the good balance complete with hairspring and transfer it over to the good balance cock. Replacing those incabloc springs can be a bit tricky, and it also appears as if the cap jewel is missing but that may just be the picture.

Posted

Thanks for your advice. You`re probably right in suggesting I transfer the balance and hairspring, but don`t know if I`m ready in attempting a h/spring removal yet! but I suppose if I`ve come this far...  Refering to pic number 014, is moving the lever I`m pointing to a correct method in moving the jeweled cock on the balance wheel? 

                                 Thanks again

Posted

Hi Tricati,

 

The lever you are pointing to in pic 014 is the adjustable hair spring stud holder and is exactly what you need to move to get the balance in beat.

The lever indicated in pic 017 is the co**BLEEP** adjustment for rate, fine adjustment is by the screw with the graduations around it.

 

Adjust the beat error first to get the tick even, then adjust the rate.

 

As CKelly pointed out, it may be easier to swap just the balance/hair spring over rather than repair the incabloc setting on the donor cock.

Posted

I bit the bullet and removed the damaged hair spring and balance wheel from the watch and replaced it with the good one from the donor movement. With the balance jewel centralised via the adjustable hair spring stud holder (as Marc suggested) and the co**BLEEP** adjustment lever set as far as it will go anti-clockwise (before coming up against the stud holder)....and the watch started, it gains an hour or so per day. If I move the stud holder as far as it will go anti-clock (and hence the balance jewel out of beat, [the watch will still run though]) and likewise the co**BLEEP** adjustment lever in the same direction, the movement still gains a lot. So I attempted moving the hairspring collet in the manner Mark demonstrates in his video ie. a screwdriver in the small slot of the collet. Unfortunately it doesn`t have a user friendly slot or the facility (space under the collet) to remove it by levering, as again demonstrated in the video. Is there a special tool for removing the collet from the 871-1 movement or can anyone suggest another method of regulating the time?

        

                                                               Thanks

ps. Although both balance wheels are from 871-1 movements, their design shapes are different: cpost-1269-0-17971700-1437317460_thumb.jppost-1269-0-21577600-1437317510_thumb.jpould this affect the timing? 

  

Posted

I don't think you should need to take the collet of to adjust it . Their should be enough adjustment in the lever you are pointing at in picture 014 . But it 's very difficult to set without a timegrapher . Just a little touch of the lever could get it from 0,1 to 2,5 in beaterror . Same is for the timesetting . Assembled a unitas 6325 today . It was out in beaterror 3,0 and adusted it to 0,1 . But the timeerror was +625 second per day at first . 1 mm of adjustment bring it down to 5-6 sec per day .

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Welcome to the forum, enjoy. 
    • Yes, the specific old tools do exist, but may be having one is not needed as they are not cheap, and also You will be able to do without it well enough. My advice will be to use regular depthing tool and adjust it for the exact distance between pallet fork and escape wheel bearings from the watch. Then remove the shellac from the pallet that now doesn't pass the ew teeth and move this pallet in. Then put the pallet fork and ew on the depthing tool and check how they lock. They should not lock when the pallet is in, but You will little by little move the pallet out and locking will appear. Then move just an idea out for reliable work and apply shellac, then check if things are still the same. You have to observe where the teeth fall on the pallets - it must be just a little below the edge between impulse and rest planes. Then You must check how everything behaves in the movement This Potence tool is so ingenious, but actually, the traditional way to do the things is much more simple. Arrange the parts not on the pillar plate, but on the cover plate. Only the central wheel will remain on the pillar plate, secured by the cannon pinion.
    • There is a tool that was made for setting up and adjusting escapements of full plate watches.  There were two styles, the picture below shows both of them.  The lower tool held a movement plate and the vertical pointed rods were adjusted to hold the unsupported pivots of the lever and escape wheel.  There was also a version of this tool that had 3 adjustable safety centres so that the balance pivot could be supported by the tool :  The other version I’m aware of is the Boynton’s Escapement Matching and Examining Tool came as a set of two or three clamps that gripped the watch plate and held the safety centres for the pivots : These do turn up on eBay from time to time.  For some escapement work, you can set up the parts in a regular depthing tool, with the centres set according to the distance between the corresponding pivot holes on the movement.  I hope this helps, Mark
    • Once you are aware of the problem, you can adjust as necessary. I have a couple of the Omega 10xx, and they are not my favourites. They seem a bit flimsy and not as solid as previous generation Omega. But I think that's true of a lot of movements from the 70-80s. For me, the 50-60s is the peak in watch movements, where the design criteria was quality, not saving the last penny.
×
×
  • Create New...