Jump to content

Balance wheel not secured to balance staff, what do I need to fix this?

GregG
 Share

Recommended Posts

GregG WRT Addict

GregG

Posted
Posted

I have a balance that has a bent pivot.  I have a Levin pivot polisher, but when I was moving the bow back and forth, I noticed that the impulse pin wasn't moving, but the rim of the balance was moving.  So the rim isn't held securely to the staff.  I am not 100% sure how to fix this issue.  I think I saw a video of it once, and the guy used a staking set with a domed punch to rivet the wheel to the staff.  Can someone clarify what I should do, and/or what staking equipment I'll need?

Thanks

Greg

IMG_20221203_200211.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JohnR725 Distinguished Member

JohnR725

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, mikepilk said:

I don't think I've ever managed to straighten a bent pivot (more than a tiny amount),  they've all broken

Normally my experience would agree with yours until I found this tool and so far it's worked quite nice for pivots. It also looks like Bergeron has revised it in some way. I have the PDF attached for describing how the tool works which as I said actually works quite nicely. But there is a limit of what you can do with a bit pivot and because somebody didn't put the staff in right the first place it might be better just to start over.

straightening bent pivot tool.JPG

7135 7136 tool for straightening bent pivots.pdf

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mikepilk Distinguished Member

mikepilk

Posted
Posted (edited)

Interesting read. I can buy a lot of new staffs for the price of one of those. But, I might try the technique of finding a slightly larger jewel hole and bending bit by bit.

Just a thought - any reason why you couldn't anneal the pivot, bend it straight, then harden it again ?

Edited by mikepilk
Link to comment
Share on other sites
nickelsilver Distinguished Member

nickelsilver

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, mikepilk said:

Interesting read. I can buy a lot of new staffs for the price of one of those. But, I might try the technique of finding a slightly larger jewel hole and bending bit by bit.

Just a thought - any reason why you couldn't anneal the pivot, bend it straight, then harden it again ?

You can do a spot temper, with the staff (or pinion) mounted, but to do a full anneal the steel has to go to critical temperature i.e. red hot then cool slowly. In either case to get back to original hardness will require going red hot again then quenching, then tempering.

 

I love that Seitz tool- as a pivot gage. Don't really like it for straightening pivots. I chuck the part in the lathe and turn the spindle by hand to find the max error, and use Dumont #8 tweezers or well dressed stubby nickel tweezers- that have been heated in an alcohol flame until almost too hot to hold- to coaxe the pivot back.

 

The hot tweezers aren't hot enough to affect the temper, but the heat really does help the metal relax and move. Some pivots are simply bent too far and will never straighten without breaking.

 

Op's staff looks homemade and hokey, it's pretty bent. If it's properly heat treated I wouldn't bet on the pivot getting straight before breaking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JohnR725 Distinguished Member

JohnR725

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

I love that Seitz tool- as a pivot gage. Don't really like it for straightening pivots.

As I already have one of the gauges I don't need it for the gauge aspect. Then I probably don't exactly use it the way they say basically does Buddha balance wheel in look and see if it's leaned and I just gently start pushing it and go to the smaller and smaller holes and so far it seems to work.

5 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

Dumont #8 tweezers or well dressed stubby nickel tweezers- that have been heated in an alcohol flame until almost too hot to hold- to coaxe the pivot back.

Then when I was in school instructor George had tweezers that had pieces of wood attached to them so we can hear them up is hot is they needed to be and he didn't have to burn his fingers and I can't really put it in his lathe or whether he did it. But in any case he was always able to save a pivot but as an instructor I'm sure he got lots of practice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mercurial
      Smit

      By Mercurial · Posted

      I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • GuyMontag
      FHF70 balance jewels settings

      By GuyMontag · Posted

      It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
    • markr
      Sterling fusee info wanted.

      By markr · Posted

      Any info on this watch would help. I know that it's sterling from London but I could not match the o letter date or make out makers mark.  Is the movement maker Camberwell or Lamberwell?   If I give it a twist it will run for about ten seconds.  $45 yard sale find.  I don't think that I want to service a fusee.  What quality is it?
    • Kkramme
      Repair and sourcing in Gold Coast, Qld, Australia

      By Kkramme · Posted

      Hello As I am learning, does anyone have any recommendations  on Repair and sourcing in Gold Coast, Qld, Australia ? eg old Seiko coil 4002920 Thanks. Cheers, Ken
    • Trav2004
      Help Identifying movement

      By Trav2004 · Posted

      Is this what all you're looking for? 
×
×
  • Create New...