Jump to content

Restauration dilemma .......


Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, grsnovi said:

Were you able to cannibalize balance screws from the donor?

I will be. Just now the GGF's movement gets taken apart / assembled a "thousand" times a day, so I'll wait until (hopefully) the movement runs fine. The donor (which is a younger movement) has indeed most of its polished screws in nicer condition 🙂

The donor runs actually quite nice, but if I decide to use it for parts, having learned how hard it is to get / find the right timing screws, for sure those are to be kept 😉

 

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

This is a classic Ship of Theseus dilemma - I guess if there were a solution then it wouldn't be a famous thought experiment.

My approach would be that I would say you are on safe ground and that it remains your GGF watch if you replace the parts that are normally replaced, like the crystal and main spring etc. In addition to this if you replace any missing parts then you are adding to it and not taking anything away so it would be your GGF watch +.

Broken (beyond repair) parts need to be replaced - there is no way around this other than keep the watch as a paperweight. So your conscience will be clean that you had no option with these parts.

Now when it gets to parts that can be repaired, I think you should give it your best effort to do so and only replace parts if it turns out that they are (or become) broken beyond repair. Parts that can be repaired to a reasonable level should be original and kept.

I would avoid replacing parts in the GGF watch that are functional with ones from the donor that are in better condition or add to the aesthetics of the watch i.e. 'nice to have'.

I think that if I were in your position and replaced anything but the bare minimum of components I would always have that nagging doubt that it was my GGF watch, but if I replaced only the minimum I would be content to know that it is as much as is possible my GGF watch.

Like I said, this is just how I would approach, it good luck!

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Waggy I'm pleased to say that the watch has now been fully restored and running within 5 sec/day.

Even though the donor watch had a similar looking movement, 99% was not interchangeable, so I had to repair what was broken. The biggest problems were replacing the chipped / broken soft Garnet pallet-fork jewels, the missing timing-screws (timing & poising), the mangled up Breguet hairspring and general wear & tear.

The watch received new jewels, some new timing screws, a new main-spring and a new mineral glass crystal. Apart from that, the watch could be kept as original as possible.

Initially I didn't think I could do it, but with help of members on WRT, it has been restored & saved 🙂

The watch has already been worn on two special occasions.

IMG_2553.thumb.jpeg.c596ccedd7e33e847a17b7ccb2877d7a.jpeg

IMG_2554.thumb.jpeg.6b8bc55f4544040df996c0e444c7db03.jpeg

IMG_2555.thumb.jpeg.302c7ed2b64c5512409692624ab3a3a6.jpeg

IMG_2556.thumb.jpeg.c9b2f5e4f133a2e692b49b9004073fba.jpeg

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As with every skill it watchmaking, it takes practice. Notice at the top of the document it says, "Practical work - 40 hours".  I can get the balance wheels 'close enough' to flat, but never seem to get them perfect. Same with gear wheels. Guess I need more practice.
    • Has it got a beat adjustment on the platform or is it a fixed hairspring? in short what you are looking at to get it just about in beat is to get the roller jewel sitting dead centre between the banking pins. So remove the platform and take of the pallet fork and escape wheel to give you clear line of site, sit the platform with the balance in place and with it level look between the banking pins and see if the roller jewel is sitting between them, if it is nice and central its there or there abouts in beat, if its not the the position of the pinned end of the hairspring needs to be adjusted to move the roller jewel into the correct position, thats why I asked if it has an adjustment on the platform or not, if it has its an easier job. 
    • I've managed to adjust it. I'm going to try and explain it as well as I can with my limited horology knowledge but I hope it helps someone in the future. There is a cam to the right of the front plate as shown in the picture. As the clock ticks along, the pin indicated in the gear comes around and slots into one of the silencer cam gaps, turning the cam. The pin completes a full rotation in 2 hours. To adjust the cam to start at the right time set the clock to just before 7. I did 6:45. Then I turned the silencer cam anticlockwise, which spins freely, until it pushed the silencer lever up and was placed just before the drop. Just before the 7AM indicated in the picture. All I then had to do was progress the hands to 7-7:15which made the pin slot into the silencer cam gap and turn the cam so the lever comes down again, unsilencing the clock. That was it. If anyone comes across this issue again I'd be happy to assist. Thanks again to everyone that helped. Hey Transporter! Thanks a lot for the reply. That was a really good explanation and I'm sure it would have made my troubleshooting a lot less painful haha. I'm sure someone will find it useful in the future. Thank you again for taking the time to try and help me out with this.
    • Now I'm completely confused, it would appear that the epilame  is oleophobic  as @Marc states: This oleophobic  behavior can be seen as beading of the droplet (as above) which stops the oil spreading which is supported by what we observe on treated/untreated cap stones (for example), but as @VWatchie states this should make the drops more mobile and is supported by the literature:   A review on control of droplet motion based on wettability modulation principles design strategies recent progress and applications.pdf   However the hole point is that we have less mobile oil so an oleophobic  would see to be the opposite of what we want. In fact this beading and high mobility are desirable properties in things like smart phone covers, see below.  I am fairly sure that epilame doesn't make the droplets more mobile, so maybe its a strange coating with dual properties that are both oleophobic (beading) and cohesive/adhesive resulting in low mobility?? This may explain the high price??  
    • The description there is exactly how it's done, and it's very well written!
×
×
  • Create New...