Jump to content

Restauration dilemma .......


Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, grsnovi said:

Were you able to cannibalize balance screws from the donor?

I will be. Just now the GGF's movement gets taken apart / assembled a "thousand" times a day, so I'll wait until (hopefully) the movement runs fine. The donor (which is a younger movement) has indeed most of its polished screws in nicer condition 🙂

The donor runs actually quite nice, but if I decide to use it for parts, having learned how hard it is to get / find the right timing screws, for sure those are to be kept 😉

 

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

This is a classic Ship of Theseus dilemma - I guess if there were a solution then it wouldn't be a famous thought experiment.

My approach would be that I would say you are on safe ground and that it remains your GGF watch if you replace the parts that are normally replaced, like the crystal and main spring etc. In addition to this if you replace any missing parts then you are adding to it and not taking anything away so it would be your GGF watch +.

Broken (beyond repair) parts need to be replaced - there is no way around this other than keep the watch as a paperweight. So your conscience will be clean that you had no option with these parts.

Now when it gets to parts that can be repaired, I think you should give it your best effort to do so and only replace parts if it turns out that they are (or become) broken beyond repair. Parts that can be repaired to a reasonable level should be original and kept.

I would avoid replacing parts in the GGF watch that are functional with ones from the donor that are in better condition or add to the aesthetics of the watch i.e. 'nice to have'.

I think that if I were in your position and replaced anything but the bare minimum of components I would always have that nagging doubt that it was my GGF watch, but if I replaced only the minimum I would be content to know that it is as much as is possible my GGF watch.

Like I said, this is just how I would approach, it good luck!

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Waggy I'm pleased to say that the watch has now been fully restored and running within 5 sec/day.

Even though the donor watch had a similar looking movement, 99% was not interchangeable, so I had to repair what was broken. The biggest problems were replacing the chipped / broken soft Garnet pallet-fork jewels, the missing timing-screws (timing & poising), the mangled up Breguet hairspring and general wear & tear.

The watch received new jewels, some new timing screws, a new main-spring and a new mineral glass crystal. Apart from that, the watch could be kept as original as possible.

Initially I didn't think I could do it, but with help of members on WRT, it has been restored & saved 🙂

The watch has already been worn on two special occasions.

IMG_2553.thumb.jpeg.c596ccedd7e33e847a17b7ccb2877d7a.jpeg

IMG_2554.thumb.jpeg.6b8bc55f4544040df996c0e444c7db03.jpeg

IMG_2555.thumb.jpeg.302c7ed2b64c5512409692624ab3a3a6.jpeg

IMG_2556.thumb.jpeg.c9b2f5e4f133a2e692b49b9004073fba.jpeg

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
    • Once a movement has the dial and hands put back and it is recased, would you expect the assembled watch to have the same amplitude as when the movement is in a movement holder and is without hands and dial? Thanks
    • C07641+ not sure what the "+" is for after the last digit.
×
×
  • Create New...