Jump to content

Bulova mis-marked dial? Or somebody changed it?


Recommended Posts

Hmmm.  Movement swap, maybe?  If the original was a similar calibre, with the same date function and with dial feet in the same locations, perhaps the original movement had too much wrong with it.  If that's the case, maybe the prior repair person either could not locate the exact same kind of movement to replace, or did not look very hard, but they were able to get this one and knew that it would work and need minimal alteration.  That said, 23 jewels isn't too bad at all, but I agree that it causes a discrepancy that wants rectifying.

EDIT: I just thought of this - it could also be that the original dial had turned to utter rubbish over time, and this was the dial that the owner or repair-person could get hold of that would fit.

Edited by KarlvonKoln
addition
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there a number printed/stamped on the inside of the case back? There should also be a two digit alpha numeric date code on the case back and on the movement (near the crown wheel I believe on this movement).

The dial matches the 1964 (Bulova M4 date code) President 'H', as does the case. But the movement should be a 30 jewel 10CRACD. If there is a 2+ year difference between the date code on the movement vs. the case, then the movement is likely not original to the case.

 

Edited by GuyMontag
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, GuyMontag said:

Is there a number printed/stamped on the inside of the case back? There should also be a two digit alpha numeric date code on the case back and on the movement (near the crown wheel I believe on this movement).

The dial matches the 1964 (Bulova M4 date code) President 'H', as does the case. But the movement should be a 30 jewel 10CRACD. If there is a 2+ year difference between the date code on the movement vs. the case, then the movement is likely not original to the case.

 

This is the case #

Case #J187588  M6

If I open it up again, I will look for the date code. 

I am putting this on ebay to sell and will give full disclosure about this. It is running great on the bench appears to be in great condition.  I have not serviced it, however.

Edited by LittleWatchShop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You need to know at least the basics. Then the questions that You ask will begin to make sense. From what is seen on the video, the gear train and escapement look fine, but the balance doesn't rotate free. I can suppose that the thin gold colored shim that must stay under the balance cock is not in place.
    • Yes, there are a lot of shapes and all of them are used in different cases. The one in Waltham A11 is one of the most spreaded and is what I have shown in the beginning. Of course, the radius of the final curve will depend on the distance between the hole in the stone and the regulator pins on the cock
    • I just found these. They don't really grab my eye at the moment, but having seen the change in some of the watches on here, before & after, the results have been pretty impressive. https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/196382906131?itmmeta=01HXBSJJXDB5J6H916ARJP9PHE&hash=item2db9555713:g:REwAAOSwUNdmOYAZ&itmprp=enc%3AAQAJAAAAwOAlUO3a1pAUX60Y8gUeXMPriraj5e7rkBNH2EA6cIUH7kb7hzoq6jRmOsYOQazk9R%2FteDESr1e50Asabv2tbJyDM%2FVODtmrAScFS4jPhHdgu6Jvt%2BFuRGBijpTkPl4NiK%2FDGr6qztc1Ujb33Tt6YdaUztOH9R1y9XJbwjH0puPDy8m0ilYcal7Vphcp7d59DLtBliNnbqfxfWhxdia2xMRyHYFHzR0Rg7NqB1z4xQGMZb73MAG4QBiF9FMkrII88Q%3D%3D|tkp%3ABk9SR_KuyvnqYw
    • I agree, it's getting harder and harder to find anything that meets the brief other than complete junk, or fake/frankenwatches. I would be in favor of raising the limit so people can continue to enjoy the challenge of resurrecting these low cost watches to their former glory and allowing the watchmaker the ability of practicing new skills without the worry of breaking the bank if all doesn't go to plan. Now all we need to do is settle on a value - maybe base the value on a standard currency so we are all playing by the same rules ($, £, €...?) Unless anyone minds I could start a poll and we could all vote on currency and value... let me know!
    • Same for me, but this is the first time I use the Bestfit. I understand that, for a 17-3/4 caliber, I have to consult page 150, but I can't find any resemblance. Thank you for all your research. I learn a little more each time I use this forum 😀
×
×
  • Create New...