Jump to content

Timegraphing


Recommended Posts

I've been looking at ways to check my watches, and a timegraph seems to be the way to go. The cost at this time is inordinately expensive. May be later. 

however, I made a startling discovery. I can have a very good system for free.  

My watch holder can hold a watch and be turned in many directions.

Placed against the microphone of a spare webcam

Timegrapher 0.5.0 for PC. 

Works a treat.

See the results

Saved over £130

 

IMG_20221027_180243.jpg

IMG_20221027_180342.jpg

IMG_20221027_180321.jpg

IMG_20221027_180412.jpg

Edited by rossjackson01
grammar
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/27/2022 at 11:31 AM, rossjackson01 said:

The cost at this time is inordinately

Yes casually it seems expensive but it's well worth the money and they work really well

 

On 10/27/2022 at 11:31 AM, rossjackson01 said:

however, I made a startling discovery. I can have a very good system for free.  

My watch holder can hold a watch and be turned in many directions.

Placed against the microphone of a spare webcam

Timegrapher 0.5.0 for PC. 

Works a treat.

See the results

Saved over £130

Just think if you didn't have a free PC to run this on I wonder which would be cheaper the PC or the timing machine?

Then there is other software out there that's free like this and we've had a rather lengthy discussion about this one

http://www.watchoscope.com/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

Then there is other software out there that's free like this and we've had a rather lengthy discussion about this one

http://www.watchoscope.com/

Thank you. Tried to install this first and it would not install on my machine. Resorted to Timegrapher 0.5.0.

 

I think I have proved to myself that I can service a watch, poorly> When I check with the timegrapher I can get + or - readings for seconds. Beat error can range from 1 to 5. These I can adjust by the lugs.  However, my problem is that I get a proverbial snowstorm for amplitude. Any idea what I need to do, to better that part of the regulation?

If there is section of the site that someone could direct me to, I would appreciate that. Typing 'timegrapher' gives limited results.

Is it something as simple as re-clean the jewels top and bottom for the balance wheel?

Regards

Ross

Edited by rossjackson01
grammar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/27/2022 at 7:31 PM, rossjackson01 said:

I've been looking at ways to check my watches, and a timegraph seems to be the way to go. The cost at this time is inordinately expensive. May be later. 

however, I made a startling discovery. I can have a very good system for free.  

My watch holder can hold a watch and be turned in many directions.

Placed against the microphone of a spare webcam

Timegrapher 0.5.0 for PC. 

Works a treat.

See the results

Saved over £130

 

IMG_20221027_180243.jpg

IMG_20221027_180342.jpg

IMG_20221027_180321.jpg

IMG_20221027_180412.jpg

Ill definitely have to check that out ross as a compare for my tg. Good information to post matey thank you.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=AwrJO1UaOF1jnfUAwBx3Bwx.;_ylu=Y29sbwMEcG9zAzIEdnRpZAMEc2VjA3Ny/RV=2/RE=1667082394/RO=10/RU=https%3a%2f%2fwww.electroschematics.com%2fwatch-scope-piezo%2f/RK=2/RS=8UX5eR3nkV.Yz.khuPW_kufAK0Y-

The above contains all about watch o scope. I use it and its ok. If you have a problem with down loading contact *****@*****.tld may be they can help. The lite version runs for free and the paid for version $40 give a life licence and several other features. there is a simple amplifier and stand to make but once done no problem. I believe there is a compatible multi position stand now reccomended by W_O_S and an amplifier ready built.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, rossjackson01 said:

I think I have proved to myself that I can service a watch, poorly> When I check with the timegrapher I can get + or - readings for seconds. Beat error can range from 1 to 5. These I can adjust by the lugs.  However, my problem is that I get a proverbial snowstorm for amplitude. Any idea what I need to do, to better that part of the regulation?

If there is section of the site that someone could direct me to, I would appreciate that. Typing 'timegrapher' gives limited results.

Is it something as simple as re-clean the jewels top and bottom for the balance wheel

 

first step in timing machine interpretation troubleshooting is to troubleshoot the timing machine.

The most important aspect of whatever you using whether it's an actual timing machine like the Chinese 1000 or the 1900 or in this case a software for the PC or a phone App the absolute most important thing is that you get a good clean signal. While the ticking sound of a watch is an audio frequency range the timing machines themselves the pickup is actually picking up the vibration of the ticking not the audio. Most things that are not timing machines have microphones that pick up audio sounds that are not actually designed for timing machine use. So whatever you use has to pick up the signal correctly or we will have a problem.

then yes you really do have to understand all of this if you would like to interpret the results of your timing whatever. Because until we get a timing machine with artificial intelligence that will just tell you what the problem is you do have to understand. Otherwise as I said you will have a problem and I will explain farther down what the problem is.

then we have a really nice video wasn't specifically designed for the purpose that I like the use it for it was designed this show us how wonderful their new escapement is but in order to show you how wonderful it is they have to show you the lever escapement which works beautiful for us. then the video shows everything is being absolutely perfect which works well for learning point of view unfortunately a real life the waveform isn't always as perfect as this but it is really nice for training purposes.

So skip ahead to about one minute and two seconds we get to the lever escapement . You can see is the balance wheel is rotating the roller jewel is crashing into the fork and generates sound number one. the absolutely most quiet sound of the ticking and its key to everything if your timing whatever is going to work.

then for the middle signals number two and three no notice they overlap  to certain degree. Then in most drawings of the escapement oscilloscope they will overlap these to one signal so typically LC three signals one reality we notice five because the overlap.

now we get to the next most important to locking sound which is number four finally crashing into the banking pin. These two of course overlap to certain degree.

ideally should watch the video more than once there might be a test later on.

https://youtu.be/g5c5RK4WFV8

then I've attached a whole bunch a images and a PDF while we continue our education into interpreting timing machine results.

from the witschi PDF two separate images where of course the waveforms are consolidated to three each rather than five and they show the importance of two of them. The roller jewel sound is number one key to everything. Then if you want have amplitude you need the fourth sound and you can measure amplitude looks pretty simple.

the notice in all of this so far we've been using the oscilloscope to look at things and unfortunately on most timing machines you don't get around oscilloscope. Although on most timing machines you don't typically need on oscilloscope because typically they pick up the signals correctly and typically will show you the correct results.

Fortunately on our application for the PC in this discussion it has an oscilloscope and let's see what we can learn from that first I went online and found another image somebody else's and notice on the oscilloscope I circled it looks pretty darn perfect. We see three clear signals and nothing in between absolute quietness. This is ideally what were looking for.

now we can see aware having our oscilloscope for your timing machine is really important let's snipped out an image for up above and compare with everything we've learned. We know that ideally background noise should be nonexistent and we see a lot of background noise if that is of high enough level the timing software might think it's a valid signal or? In other words it might interpret it as a problem in the watch something making noise that shouldn't be making noise and of course it could show up as random dots on the screen. Then the number one key signal doesn't appear to be super clear to me if it's not clear to  software then your rate is going to be all over the place especially if it varies a little each time in other words you can't consistently trigger off something that it has to trigger off of. Of course if the rate is wrong because it doesn't get a nice signal amplitude will be wrong and basically everything will be wrong all because of a signal that's not quite correct

then mentioned there was a problem of what if we do not get a clean signal? It may be we don't get a clean signal because the watch is having issues and running really poorly or we may not get a good clean signal if you're just not picking up the ticking sound correctly. The problem becomes where is the problem is if the inability to pick up the signal correctly or is the watch itself having a problem. We've done this a couple of times with people with phone apps where the problem was really in the app and the microphone that wasn't designed to pick up ticking of watch sounds. As the image I found online shows the software can work it just has to have a proper pickup that gets the correct signals otherwise we can end up with a situation like this of is that the watch having a problem or is it the software having a problem?

 

 

 

 

timing machine first and fourth sound.JPG

timing machine first sound.JPG

timing on oscilloscope TG good.JPG

timing TG problem on oscilloscope.JPG

Witschi Training Course.pdf

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I tried the Moebius 9415 in any sensible amount, down to microscopic a drop (or "super minimalistic"); the size of droplet which makes you really wonder why you would/should apply anything at all? But to no avail, consistently a lower amplitude compared to my Dr.Tillwich 1-3. Of course, as John mentioned above, the Dr.Tillwich 1-3, just like the Moebius 9010, likes to go somewhere else. Since short however, I'm the (proud?) owner of a bottle of Moebius Fixodrop. Can't say that I'm a proud owner of the 9415. So far, I haven't seen or discovered the "magic" of the 9415. Meanwhile, Moebius 😂 has my money though.........
    • I used to be quite active on The Lotus Forum when I owned my Esprit. I was there for so long, Bibs asked me to be a moderator. I'm not sure how long I did that for, but I think I turned into the second longest serving moderator. When I 'handed back my keys', Bibs made me a Full Forum Member. Normally this is a paid membership. My reward I suppose for helping out for many years. Bibs (forum owner) is quite active on there and if I am not wrong, don't quote me in other words, I think he once said that the money from memberships didn't cover the running cost. He adds money himself to keep it going. Does Mark have any sort of subscription scheme on here? I'll admit that I never paid to be a member on TLF. I should have. I never did. I agree that it would be a good idea that there is some sort of contingency plan for this forum. I intend on becoming more active on here. Life has just been getting in the way recently. I enrolled on Mark's watch course and was keenly doing that, but even that has had to take a back seat for a while. I am looking forward to getting back into that and also starting to do work on the clocks that I have been amassing. To do that successfully, I see myself needing to lean on the other members here. If for whatever reason this forum was to close, I think a great many of us would struggle.
    • I think we are about there, if there were still lots out there then the cost of a watch from 5 years ago would be around the same as it is now (allowing for inflation). Given that the price has gone up several times over we can only assume that supply cannot keep up with demand so we must be at or past peak supply, especially if the trend continues. I see even places like Australia, Ukraine and even South America are selling watches on eBay, picking over their stocks, mixed in with fakes and Frankenwatches etc.
    • I understand the demand bit, the generation below me 30ish are too technology engrossed to own a mechanical watch and they just dont like old stuff. I also consider myself at the getting on age of 57 to be a rare find of someone that likes old stuff, i did buy an almost 100 year old book yesterday titled " The New Modern Home " printed 1929.  Cost me a quid. What i was trying to work out is if we have reached a volume peak of watches being discovered hidden in the back of drawers.  Those watches that were hung onto until they entered the hands of the non sentimental generation. 
    • Even for myself who only started getting into watch repair/servicing during COVID I have seen a huge jump in watch prices - we have a 404 channel on this forum. When I started you could relatively easily find a watch on eBay to restore and put onto the channel, however this is now almost impossible and the only feasible solution is to buy a job lot with an average price <4.04. Even watches sold for parts/spares are 3 or four times the price of only a few years ago. Why - Either Demand must have increased in order to push up the price, or supply is reduced. I think it is a little of both, I think that most watches in the UK/US may have been picked over, which agrees with most of what @Neverenoughwatches says so supply of all kinds of vintage watches, including tat is dwindling. As a double whammy I think that more people are wanting watches, either to work on, or as a way to differentiate themselves from the Apple Watch and FitBit crowd. The upshot is that half decent watches that require restoration are now $500 instead of $100 and cheaper watches (Seiko 5 etc) are now $50 instead of $10, and even Mumbai Specials and garbage are now pushing $50 each. When - how long will this last, I think that most of the people who are returning to mechanical watches are those that have previously experienced life without them and want to return to something with a bit of personality that doesn't buzz every 10 seconds on your wrist and tell you how many steps you have done today. i.e. the 30-40+ generation. My son who is 17 has several mechanical watches but only wears one on a special occasion and is obviously only aware of them at all in part due to my hobby. I asked him the other day how many of his friends wear a watch and he told me that some use a smart watch but most just use their phones. So as I see it, demand will start to fall once the sub-thirty crowd start becoming the majority and/or the older amongst us stop buying watches and switch our attention to mobility scooters and trying to remember our bank password. Price - I think this is here to stay, even if demand does start to drop as the older generation becomes to decrepit and stops buying and the younger generation isn't interested in buying, supply will become progressively less as time goes on as more vintage watches become lost or broken beyond repair. I think the prices will plateau at some point as an equilibrium is reached as reduced demand is balanced with reduced supply, i.e. less and less people buying less and less watches. Sorry for the long ramble!
×
×
  • Create New...