Jump to content

Vulcain Cricket (S2315A cal.120)


Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, Klassiker said:

Yep, that's fine. Not centred, but that's not causing the OP's problem. For some reason I couldn't zoom in with anything like that resolution.

Using Google Chrome, right click on the image, then "Open Link in new window".  You can then zoom in to the original pic size

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@AmmarHello. Yes I did. This is the second time now and I've done it a bit differently this time. 

Personally I think that the power distribution/travel is poor on this movement, and that the balance wheel perhaps should be a bit heavier (to react less to changes). 

This time I cleaned the leaving daylight out of the main spring and the whole power train. Before installing the spring I used Molykote DX paste and applied super thin coat on it (first time I just added some oil on top of the assembled spring inside the barrel in several spots).  To maybe smoot-out/dampen the movement of the spring? 

Judging by the timegrapher, movement runs smoother, but still I notice some acceleration/deceleration with the balance wheel. With lowest 308 and highest 347 amplitude, witch results in -7...+5 s/d.  But those jumps are pretty rare, most of the time it runs around 320-322 and -1...0s/d. 

Maybe if I could record for a longer period of time the changes and fine the time between the pics, that might shine some light where the defect might be. Maybe there is some wear on one side of the pivot? 

Honestly not sure if its worth it, as I spent already quite a lot time fiddling with this watch.

What do you guys think? 

 

014EC295-D157-4E38-8573-1302623C8AAC.jpeg

 

3DE9F819-7C60-4D7E-A2A0-0C8DBA761405.jpeg

FD8AF221-732E-4059-9446-BCB9C75A5412.jpeg

Edited by swiss2k
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, swiss2k said:

@AmmarHello. Yes I did. This is the second time now and I've done it a bit differently this time. 

Personally I think that the power distribution/travel is poor on this movement, and that the balance wheel perhaps should be a bit heavier (to react less to changes). 

This time I cleaned the leaving daylight out of the main spring and the whole power train. Before installing the spring I used Molykote DX paste and applied super thin coat on it (first time I just added some oil on top of the assembled spring inside the barrel in several spots).  To maybe smoot-out/dampen the movement of the spring? 

Judging by the timegrapher, movement runs smoother, but still I notice some acceleration/deceleration with the balance wheel. With lowest 308 and highest 347 amplitude, witch results in -7...+5 s/d.  But those jumps are pretty rare, most of the time it runs around 320-322 and -1...0s/d. 

Maybe if I could record for a longer period of time the changes and fine the time between the pics, that might shine some light where the defect might be. Maybe there is some wear on one side of the pivot? 

Honestly not sure if its worth it, as I spent already quite a lot time fiddling with this watch.

What do you guys think? 

What do I think? I wonder what you are trying to achieve?

You have achieved chronometer standard from a fairly standard watch movement. I've had few watches which run that well. 

Well done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello @mikepilk. Thank you for the kind words.

Maybe I was not clean in my text. What I want is it to stop jumping from 308 to 347 degrees back and forth.  😃 

An interesting observation. When I set the movement dial side up in the timegrapher, amplitude is higher, beat error is lower and overall seems to run much better. 

Magic!

E564EDC4-8AC1-4C4E-A266-01529DC33B27.jpeg

Edited by swiss2k
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we use the rub-off epilame method of pallet stones (run dry for a few minutes before applying the epilame) where will the oil go/be transported when it is pushed away from the impulse surface by the escape wheel teeth? Onto the epilame-treated sections of the pallet! Once the oil has been applied/transported to the epilame-treated sections of the pallet where will it then go? Nowhere as the oil will remain on the epilame. So, perhaps the run-dry method defeats its intended purpose leaving the pallet impulse surfaces dry!? If, on the other hand, we do not remove the epilame from the pallet stones where the escape wheel teeth come in contact with them I'd expect more oil to remain where we want it and need it. Yes, I agree, that is the question, and my gut feeling tells me that is exactly the case. Epilame was created to have an adhesive trait and the oleophobic property is just a side effect.  
    • Might that be the viscous nature of oil resisting gravity H  ,  we have been comparing water and hydrophobic surfaces which are similar in principle but water is much less viscous than oil. I guess what we trying to discover is if epilame also has an adhesive trait as well as being oleophobic. Plus the oil dropet has very little mass for gravity to work on, like watching tiny water beads that can grip onto vertical glass until they are connected together to increase their mass then run down. Gravity isn't the only factor at play when oil is placed on pallet stones. The oil receives a lot of bashing that may push it out of position ? Thinking about it if the oil stays in position for 10 minutes enough time for the escape wheel to scrape off the epilame , then  a walled in lubrication has been achieved,  the epilame is no longer beneath the oil ( possibly mixed into the oil )
    • But it also makes it seem less susceptible to gravity. If you place a droplet of oil on an epilame-treated surface the droplet of oil will still stay in place even if you then flip the surface from a horizontal to a vertical position. That is, the oil droplet remains anchored, and that's the purpose of epilame. If it was just a matter of creating an oleophobic surface we could probably use other, less expensive, methods!? I don't know @Waggy but my gut feeling tells me you're spot on (pun intended!). I believe the oleophobic property is a side effect of epilame which is designed to keep the oil anchored.
    • Saturday morning 27/4 Sunday evening 28/4 Monday evening 29/4 Floor has a drain in the middle so I am hoping that there is very little fall on it, if any. Room is about 2.5 x 2.5 metres square. Can only use about 1/2 of one wall on the right of the pictures which has a sliding glass door in it. And only about 3/4 of the wall to the left of the pictures as it has the door to the house in it. Progress. 🙂 
    • This makes much more sense now, the oil is withdrawing itself to make as little contact with the epilame as possible. Same principle as wax on a car creates a hyrophobic surface that makes the cohesive properties of water molecules pull together.  The water beads run off only when under the influence of gravity but still remain cohesively beaded up. And as mentioned earlier a pivot would keep the oil in place on a cap jewel.  Epilame on an escapement would be a different scenario, there is nothing to hold the oil in position if gravity tugs at the bead to move, plus the escape teeth pull the oil about Maybe this is why its suggested to run the watch for a short while to remove the epilame to make two oleophobic surfaces either side of the oil, creating a ring of fire 🔥 around it 😅 The oil is repelled by every surface of the epilame even that which it sits upon. So the oil pulls together to make as little contact with it as possible, but the oil cant float above that area, it can only sit there on top of it. Under gravity the oil could potentially run away as an oil bead, unless the epilame has an adhesive property which i dont think it does ? So something else keeps it in position ie a pivot under a cap jewel . But that isn't the case in a pallet jewel situation. 
×
×
  • Create New...