Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Busy repairing and servicing a Nivada Compensamatic with the AS 1686 movement. All of the references I can find on the movement show a lyre shaped Incabloc spring for both top and bottom of the balance, including the very well documented Vulcain service on this site. This one is different.

 

The top spring looks very much like a KIF Trior, but the bottom mount is significantly smaller with what looks like a different spring. I've tried to get some detail on the attached images but was having to hand hold. Any suggestions would be much appreciated.

 

as1686.thumb.jpg.f8388886f4d1199fc3de4eb41d8ca2db.jpg1676259494_as16862.thumb.jpg.a2b2053f8c7720a33e6ddbf8f337673d.jpg

 

 

Edited by SpringMangler
test edit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very strange !  The following is from BestFit - at it says, the ones with 3 arms are the hardest to identify 😳

I can't see how you disassemble the top spring?  I had a similar spring in a FHF, but these were designed for money saving and not meant for disassembly. This is obviously a better quality movement - cap jewel on escape wheel.

image.png.c61b365f8fde20a371d3d4f7b5f47182.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, grsnovi said:

Look closely at the top image and you'll see there is in fact a cut out to allow the lifting of each of the three points.

Well spotted. I didn't se it in the shadow.

I've no idea what the lower shock is, or why it's so different to the top !

The AS 1686 is the same as the Standard 1686, and Bestfit lists many different shock jewels for this movement.

Edited by mikepilk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the input gents. I had spotted the small cutout on the top mounting so it looks like a modified piece of pegwood might do the trick.  Looking at the bottom spring there appears to be three notches as marked below, but these are hard to spot even through a loupe. Looks like it'll be hard to remove but is going to be extremely difficult to put back.

as1686 3.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, mikepilk said:

I have the benefit of working under a microscope. It really helps with this type of work.

It's something I have to seriously look into, pardon the pun, as I sometimes battle with a loupe and varifocals. I have tried just wearing reading specs with a loupe but then cannot see anything beyond the end of my arms. 

 

 

Edited by SpringMangler
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, SpringMangler said:

It's something I have to seriously look into, pardon the pun, as I sometimes battle with a loupe and varifocals. I have tried just wearing reading specs with a loupe but then cannot see anything beyond the end of my arms. 

If you can, it's a game changer. I do everything under the microscope. I don't know how people can tweak hairsprings using a loupe - your head has to be where your tweezers need to be.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SpringMangler said:

…Looking at the bottom spring there appears to be three notches as marked below, but these are hard to spot even through a loupe. Looks like it'll be hard to remove but is going to be extremely difficult to put back.

as1686 3.jpg

I personally would not try to disassemble this setting! Clean it as it is and oil through the jewel hole.

Edited by Kalanag
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SpringMangler said:

Thanks for the input gents. I had spotted the small cutout on the top mounting so it looks like a modified piece of pegwood might do the trick.  Looking at the bottom spring there appears to be three notches as marked below, but these are hard to spot even through a loupe. Looks like it'll be hard to remove but is going to be extremely difficult to put back.

The spring shape is probably like the top, with arms that line up with the 3 slots when turned.

It will need to come apart for cleaning. Try turning it with some pegwood and see what happens !

Post a pic

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SpringMangler said:

Thanks for the input gents. I had spotted the small cutout on the top mounting so it looks like a modified piece of pegwood might do the trick.  Looking at the bottom spring there appears to be three notches as marked below, but these are hard to spot even through a loupe. Looks like it'll be hard to remove but is going to be extremely difficult to put back.

as1686 3.jpg

Yes mate. They are an absolute pain and so tiny.  The first one i did I lost twice trying to fit it with tweezers which is virtually impossible.  A recessed end of a toothpick did sort it though. Gauging the size to shape the toothpick took a little while. It needs to just fit the 3 spring arms to press them down and get them all started in the setting slots. Then you may have to ease them round with a couple of finely dressed oilers. Great fun 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

....  just fit the 3 spring arms to press them down and get them all started in the setting slots. Then you may have to ease them round with a couple of finely dressed oilers. Great fun 👍

Presumably you too need 3 arms to achieve this 😧

What poor design to make a part so difficult to fit 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kalanag said:

I personally would not try to disassemble this setting! Clean it as it is and oil through the jewel hole.

Haha. Aw and miss so much fun.

14 minutes ago, mikepilk said:

Presumably you too need 3 arms to achieve this 😧

What poor design to make a part so difficult to fit 

Haha. Yes mike if you try to do it with 3 seperate tools. My first attempts were with one pair of tweezers at the correct spacing to hit 2 of the arms and another pair to deal with the other arm. I was failing miserably for over half an hour with 2 temporary disappearances. Resided to making the wooden tool which took just 2 trys to install the spring. I do have the correct brass version of the tool now.  Yep i agree a poor design, common in small  70's Oris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the advice guys. I'll tackle the top one first and see how I get on. I was thinking of taking Kalanag's advice and attempting to clean and lubricate the bottom mounting in situ for now, whilst appreciating that it won't be thoroughly cleaned in the same way as removing. Think there was a similar discussion around some Seiko mountings recently.

Anyway, good job there's no swear jar nearby as I'd be skint by now.

Edited by SpringMangler
Can't spell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, SpringMangler said:

Thanks for all the advice guys. I'll tackle the top one first and see how I get on. I was thinking of taking Kalanag's advice and attempting to clean and lubricate the bottom mounting in situ for now, whilst appreciating that it won't be thoroughly cleaned in the same way as removing. Think there was a similar discussion around some Seiko mountings recently.

Anyway, good job there's no swear jar nearby as I'd be skint by now.

Lol. Which is why i have permanently empty pockets 🙃 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, mikepilk said:

I assume these are for the gear train as there's no shock protection ?

How do you clean them?

Right! It‘s made by Incabloc S.A. and used for the escape wheel of the JLC 889. You have to rely on the power of your cleaning machine and cleaning fluid. This could be one reason why watchmakers don‘t like the JLC 889 and its siblings so much 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The same argument as the small Diashock - can they be cleaned properly without disassembly. I think that, as long as there isn't "baked on" crusty oil, using proper cleaning fluids in a heated ultrasonic will clean OK (?). Though I always disassemble  where possible. 

I'm surprised a company like JLC will use them on escape wheels. I looked on the Incabloc website but no info on cleaning.

Edited by mikepilk
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

I finally got around to servicing this movement today. Since the original post I've acquired a stereo microscope which has made all of the difference and given me a lot more confidence.

I decided to get stuck into the balance jewels and they were surprisingly easy to remove, but very strange.

The shock spring, both top and bottom, is integrated into a type of chaton/jewel, so no separate spring. The bottom fitting is a two legged affair and the top one has three legs. The jewel that would normally sit against the spring in an Inca type setting sits directly on the pivot with the rounded side facing up against the flat face of the shock/chaton/jewel fitting. I did try putting flat face to flat face but it stopped the balance.

I would have taken photos but was too busy swearing trying to work out which part to oil and which way up each part went.

All back together now and running well. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/15/2022 at 12:36 PM, Kalanag said:

I personally would not try to disassemble this setting! Clean it as it is and oil through the jewel hole.

So you just hope the jewels are in good shape?   

Is observing the freely turning balance test conclusive? 

Rgds

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some watch manufaturer own their shock system which usually are made in- house. 

Brands  who buy movements from others , have choice of shock systems and order what they want, often to be or look distinguished. 

As far as I am concerned, any shock spring thats easy to unlock& re lock and doesn't fly is good.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Moved in. Now working out the best place to have things so moving around the room makes sense. The wooden movement testing rig may end up being suspended from the roof with some pulleys and ropes that I salvaged from some alfresco blinds that we replaced. I always seem to salvage things from things we scrap thinking, "I have an idea what I can use these for." I hope I'm not the only one that does that. My wife hates me for it. "What are you going to do with all this crap?" Anyway, here you go. If anyone has suggestions for workflow around a room, speak up. All Ideas are appreciated. The bench on wheels will carry either a laptop or my Samsung table for using with the little camera that is on the tripod for photos while dismantling etc. The small bar fridge in the corners going to have water etc in it and I might move the coffee maker from the kitchen out there as I am the only one that uses it. I want to get an ultrasonic cleaner so I may set up some sort of cleaning rig in front of the glass of the sliding door. Where the grandmother clock is currently standing. I'm hoping that I will be able to transition my working area, which is the table that the stool is sitting in front of, fairly easily between clocks and watches. I'll be doing my best to make sure that tools for each are separatedwhen stored. Logistics. I'll have a bit of wall space for being able to hang clocks if I find some that I wish to keep or hopefully at some time to be able to hang customer clocks for monitoring after servicing/repairs. The clock on the left in the blue pillow slip and the grandmother clock are earmarked for  Jarryd and his wife, Sara. He helped me move the benches in today. And then went on to tell me that ticking clocks drive him nuts. Who doesn't like the rhythmic ticking of a clock? I have a green pad for adding to the bench for a working surface. It is not a cutting mat or one of the Bergeon mats. It is actually a green desk writing mat. Was really cheap and will do exactly what I want, I think. I also have to get the sparkies back that put our new stove in to put some power points on the walls behind the benches. Hopefully this is all going to go well. I'm excited about it. It'll beat having to live out in the garage doing it. The other thing I have to do is cut a circle or square of plastic to go over the bouncing watch or clock part black hole in the middle of the floor. I would pretty much guarantee that anything that sproings off the bench would end up going straight down that drain. 😄     
    • So leave off the seconds. Stand the movement on its edge, its the dial edge that rests on the pad ( either rubber or cork , something that wont slip ). Use a finger of your left hand to hold the movement upright,  right hand presses the release and flicks out the stem. I do it this way so i can see what I'm under a microscope. But you could hold the movement between two fingers of your left hand, its the right that has to manipulate the stem out by pushing the release and flicking out the stem with  right ring finger nail. Sounds more complicated than it actually is. I guess you could fix a push pin to something solid, then all you need to do is push the release against the pin, leaving your right hand completely free to pull the stem out.
    • Try putting everything back together and closing the back cover. I think one of the two springs has to contact the metal casing to ground the casing. So when you press the button, it will touch the contact on circuit board and close the circuit.
    • Yes, the seconds hand is the longest and goes almost to the edge of the dial. I can’t quite picture it how you do it on the rubber pad
    • A don't think so it leaked or damaged it because the watch itself works it just the buttons ain't working not connecting with the circuit board have taken more pictures of where the buttons makes contact with the circuit board.
×
×
  • Create New...