Jump to content

Yaay! 3L Ultrasonic Cleaner ARRIVED


Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Gramham said:

@Neverenoughwatches,

Hahahahaha - of course you have my permission to use any and all of my confabulated, archaic, obscure and otherwise (to me at least) neat-o terminology!

g.
-----

Lol Cheers matey. Get that machine pumping out some good watch cleaning sonics asap it will be fine. I'm pleased to see you are enjoying, and getting passionate and enthusiastic about our little hobby. Have a good day 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My machine does not have multiple power settings.

One thing about cleaning - 

Vintage watches often have issues that make them vulnerable to damage in any cleaning machine, ultrasonic or mechanical. 

The shellac that holds pallets and roller jewels in place can be old and flaking off. Any agitation can loosen things, so that a repair is required after cleaning. I've just had a roller jewel move that I believe moved during cleaning, I need to straighten it out and secure it in place again.

Small parts can be corroded, such that agitation can cause them to break. I've recently had that happen to a regulator pin on a pocket watch.  I could tell it was mostly corroded away, and it broke in the ultrasonic. Replaced it and the watch ran fine and is back in the hands of the owner.

I don't remember ever having any issue with modern watches in the ultrasonic, although I suppose cleaning could expose a manufacturing flaw. 

Cheers!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/19/2022 at 9:30 PM, dadistic said:

My machine does not have multiple power settings.

One thing about cleaning - 

Vintage watches often have issues that make them vulnerable to damage in any cleaning machine, ultrasonic or mechanical. 

The shellac that holds pallets and roller jewels in place can be old and flaking off. Any agitation can loosen things, so that a repair is required after cleaning. I've just had a roller jewel move that I believe moved during cleaning, I need to straighten it out and secure it in place again.

Small parts can be corroded, such that agitation can cause them to break. I've recently had that happen to a regulator pin on a pocket watch.  I could tell it was mostly corroded away, and it broke in the ultrasonic. Replaced it and the watch ran fine and is back in the hands of the owner.

I don't remember ever having any issue with modern watches in the ultrasonic, although I suppose cleaning could expose a manufacturing flaw. 

Cheers!

 

Hello @dadistic,

Thanks for the cautionary note(s).

In his chapter on cleaning, de Carle (1981) mentions special treatment of the mainspring, balance and pallets (p. 207) .

I think that out of an abundance of caution any component with shellac need to be cleaned with very special care, old or not.  While I think Benzine is not especially deleterious to the mainspring (de Carle's advice on page 209 is to wipe the mainspring with Benzine, but not to immerse it in Benzine, which seems odd to me), it is however a strong solvent for shellac. 

On page 212, de Carle recounts the story of a pallet fork being immersed in Benzine for just five minutes and the shellac as a result being pitted and reduced "almost to a jelly".  His final advice was:  "...it is not worth while to court trouble, and in no circumstances should pallets or balance and balance spring be placed in the cleaning fluid used in cleaning machines."  Though it is not clear if the "cleaning fluid" he mentions is Benzine or some other proprietary solution.

It seems that cleaning any watch part that features shellac is very tricky and probably where a manual cleaning event is called for with the minimum possible exposure to vibration and solvents.  

This will be mentioned in the Ultrasonic Cleaner Manual under ULTRASONIC CLEANING APPROACHES BY INDUSTRY, as below...what do you think of this?

image.png.5c6fcffa751a2461b74e312d4131ba58.png


REFERENCES

de Carle, D (1981) CLOCK AND WATCH REPAIRING (2nd Edition), London: Robert Hale (ISBN:  0-7091-9436-6).
https://www.gettextbooks.com/isbn/9780719803802/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Proper cleaning solutions do not damage watch parts when used in cleaning machines. That's why I switched from DIY solutions to Zenith Hi-Tech cleaning and rinsing solutions. 

The point I was trying to make was that vintage watch parts can be fragile,  and cleaning, however it is done, can be risky at times.  

I routinely clean the balance and pallet fork in my ultrasonic.  

Cheers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, dadistic said:

Proper cleaning solutions do not damage watch parts when used in cleaning machines. 

This must not be taken as an absolute statement. Ammonia is aggressive and other stuff may also be damaging under certain conditions. We have reports of sophisticated plating, like rhodium, being damaged with even relatively short exposure, so caveat emptor. I don't remembered whar was the professional solution blamed for that. 

Personally i think that problems, overspending, waste of chemicals and time largely descends from the fixation for "cleanliness" that some people, beginners but even advanced have. I understand that because this kind of OCD goes hand in hand with watchmaking, but sometime we read things like that one must use an U/S cleaner for a bracelet that needs no more than hit water, dish detergent and and 1 minute with a toothbrush. Or leaving parts in the ultrasonic for 30 minutes!

Overdone / aggressive cleaning is just like excessive lubrication, not only it does not do any good, but actually can create serious issues. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The cleaning solutions that I use have no ammonia in them, and are low odor. I have never seen damage to parts that I could blame on the cleaning solutions. 

Five minute cycles (the default on my machine) are fine in most instances.  Evaluate after, and if needed run another cycle. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gramham, Benzine is another name for Naphtha (aka Petroleum Ether) Note that Benzene is another chemical compound entirely. Likewise Ether is not petroleum ether.

Petroleum ether is a mixture of alkanes, such as pentane, hexane, and heptane. The laboratory reagent  is supplied in different boiling ranges such as 40-60 C and 60-80 C. Each range has a different proportion of alkanes. 

Lab grade Hexane is sometimes recommended for dip cleaning balance springs. 
Easier to obtain the lab reagents where I live so that is what I’m using (or rather intend to use)

Edited by JohnFrum
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Gramham said:

Benzine, which seems odd to me), it is however a strong solvent for shellac. 

Benzine / naphta / lighter fluid / petroleoum ether / Stoddard / motor petrol / gasoline ( and probably some few dozen more common products or names) are all closely related which do NOT dissolve shellac. All that has been discussed and repeated to death in our pinned topic

 

 

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jdm said:

Benzine / naphta / lighter fluid / petroleoum ether / Stoddard / motor petrol / gasoline ( and probably some few dozen more common products or names) are all closely related which do NOT dissolve shellac. All that has been discussed and repeated to death in our pinned topic

 

 

Hello @jdm,

Thanks for the pointer!

g.
----

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thats an AS 984  mike.   Found in the Enicar and Rotary ATPs
    • I'm going for an AS movement - the general layout, screw/jewel positions are similar.  
    • I haven't yet but I will take it out tonight! Thank you. Will post pics of dial side tonight too.
    • Did you have a look under the ballance? Often the movement maker/number is hidden there.
    • I wonder if 9415 is based on a base oil of 941? it's interesting what questions bring and the tech sheet answers it's the viscosity of the base oil. Then the impact? There is something we're missing here for that which would have a big influence on all of the house image above is 9514 image below is 941.then always interesting when specifications do not exactly agree? They ledge above for 941 indicates 110 viscosity but the image off the spec sheet is slightly less but I guess close enough   my understanding of the concern of too much 9415 is as we know the loss of amplitude. But why do we have a loss of amplitude? So impact it's basically oil should be very slippery. But what about non-impact? Like the edges of the escape wheel? Another thing that comes to play here is the shape of the escape wheel itself. Notice on the last a more vintage escape wheel with just a flat surface whereas the modern escape wheels usually made out of steel versus grass much much thinner their contact areas greatly been reduced and sometimes I think there even slightly curved. So is it conceivable at everything that isn't a flat surface on impact is going to be sticky? So this is where the shape of the escape wheel will have a big impact literally on how slippery things are. Oh and for all of you obsessed with worrying about too much 9415 I never worry about it because typically I'm doing pocket watches and it doesn't seem to be an issue at all. on the other hand I'm much more concerned about a watch that keeps time for 24 hours as opposed to the concern of the group of keeping amplitude for 24 hours. Then yes some pocket watches have steel escape wheels and do look like the escape wheel on the right.   
×
×
  • Create New...