Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This was my first attempt at replacing a balance staff. I followed instructions from  Mark's course and Kalle's videos . I used A and B stakes from my C&E set.

The hub disintegrated, did I tap too hard or did I choose the wrong size stakes, did the hub have a manufacturing defect, it was NOS for Omega  330 series.

Any suggestions would be welcome

Thanks in advance and cheers

1111.JPG

1212.JPG

1313.JPG

1414.JPG

1515.JPG

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I don't know what size those stakes are, but I can see from the last photo that the rivet is still untouched. So yes, you hit too hard, and also had the wrong size punches (stakes are what go underneath). You want a convex punch that just fits over the hairspring diameter, thus against the rivet, then a flat faced punch with the same hole size. Tap tap tap tap tap tap tap round face, turn the balance a few degrees and punch as well in the opposite direction every few taps to even out any irregularities, check that it has spread a bit, then tap tap tap tap tap tap tap flat face to flatten it (turning as before). The roller table diameter should be in a hole in the staking tool die plate that lets it fit just freely, not tight but not flopping around, so the hub is supported on its flat surface. Obviously align the die plate well with the centering punch once you've chosen the hole.

 

If the balance is a light friction fit on the staff (ideal), then you would want a punch like you used to seat it, with finger pressure, no tapping.

 

Here's an image from lesson 15 of the Chicago School of Watchmaking course. It's easily found online in PDF format (I just grabbed this from here and it seems clean). Shows the fit of the concave punch, flat will be the same, also the fit in the die plate of the tool.

 

Remember this is a really small piece of heat treated steel, not a roofing nail 😜. Also, just as reading about a subject always benefits from visual demonstration, visual demonstration will always benefit from some well written and illustrated reading.

 

 

staff rivetting 1.jpg

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 1
Posted
42 minutes ago, Sandy13 said:

This was my first attempt at replacing a balance staff.

Here are some additional first-class illustrations by member @HSL.

When I did this the first time, most of my information came from the video "Fitting a new balance staff to a vintage 1940s cyma www military watch. Repair series" and "How to fit a new balance staff to a vintage Rolex watch. Watch repair tutorials" and the above thread that I linked to. I'm sure there were more posts on WRT that I drew information from which I'm sure you'll find if you Google it (site:watchrepairtalk.com balance staff replacement).

1 hour ago, Sandy13 said:

I followed instructions from  Mark's course and Kalle's videos .

Now, this makes me curious. I've taken the first three courses on watchfix.com, but I can't recall any video demonstrating how to replace a balance staff. I only remember Mark showing how to remove the roller and the collet. Is this in the "LEVEL 5 Servicing Chronograph Watches"

Anyway, best of luck on your next attempt. Practice makes perfect!

Posted

Thanks to all for spending the time on your answers. I will trying again with some scrap movements.

VWatchie, I stand corrected on Mark's course, likely I mixed up presentations from Kalle Slaap on Chronoglide.

 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this post MikePilk, I just came across a similar problem with an Omega 1022.  The problem I had was the seconds pinion spring was bent out of shape and did not even engage with the wheel properly, so the seconds hand was not moving at all. (no power loss though :) I removed the automatic module so I could access the spring and work on it. Once I bent it back close to the right shape, I experienced the same problem you reported about power loss.  Many tweaks later, and the seconds hand is moving properly again, with amplitude back to good numbers again. Cheers
    • After cleaning up the pivots, I made bushes on the lathe. At this point I've pressed in 6 bushes (3 sets) and the wheels turn smooth. What I can also tell you, is that I'm not looking forward to final assembly. Getting the pivots aligned seems to get exponentially more difficult with each wheel that is added.
    • Islands are interesting places to live depending upon their size and other factors. This is a bigger island and it has a bridge to get there at least on one end. It's also big enough that you don't have to go someplace else to get things typically. It can be a problem if you get a job in Seattle though. Yes I've known of people who commuted from the island to Seattle for a job and I don't quite remember how many hours it took but it took a long time. So basically islands are nice if you don't have to leave very often.
    • Thanks @JohnR725! Everything you say makes a lot of sense and is encouraging to read.
    • isn't it nice to have a decent case open or when the case doesn't want to be opened? In the case of a Rolex watch that supposed to pass specific water resistant testing you probably do need to tighten the back down. But they shouldn't be tightened so much that they risk stripping the threads out. Then the other problem that comes up is the gaskets can start to disintegrate and then getting the back off can be quite a challenge unless you have a really good tool and perhaps some penetrating oil to loosen things up. Yes really nice case marking. When I was in school we were taught to mark the cases and  the American watch and clockmakers Institute even had a? So if you joined at one time they would give you an identification number. They were explaining or giving an example of if the watches ever found in you have a unique number they can perhaps figure out the history of the watch or identify the body it's attached to for instance not that that probably comes up that often. So you got a unique number and even made a special metal stamp that you can purchase. It wasn't a super big aggressive stamp but still it left a mark in the back of the case. Then I heard from people at work on Rolex watches they were using a felt pen indelible but later on they decided that was bad because apparently the ink could release  chemicals although it seems like once it's dry that shouldn't be an issue. Then of course today was nice is you can keep computer records sealed have to mark anything at all I personally find it's best to leave no reference behind that you were even there. Especially when you have a beautiful watch that has no markings at all and now it has your scribbling all over it not good typically if there is a typical and watch repair?  a lot of minor repairs you don't need to do a complete servicing. But beyond a certain point you're going to have to take apart a lot of stuff you're going to disrupt the lubrication even if it looks perfect right now and yes you might as well just go ahead the service the whole thing. also in a watch like this where a lot of things seem to be going on the complete service would be better then you'll know exactly where you stand versus dealing with unknown mysteries for prior repair.
×
×
  • Create New...