Jump to content

WW Lathe tailstock drill modification--seems very clever


Recommended Posts

I got this book by Rod Lloyd about fixing Atmos clocks.  He has a separate section on clock repair in general.

He presents this idea of taking a piece of 8mm round stock that fits in a WW tailstock and using the headstock, drills a hole that will fit a PCB drill bit.  By drilling the hole with the headstock, perfect alignment is guaranteed.  Now the thing missing is, how do you secure the drill bit.  The implication is that each runner is a one off bit.  Maybe I am wrong.

Why not put a set screw into the runner (would have to be removed to remove the runner, of course)?

Anybody done this?

I have a collet holder that fists my tailstock runner, but is not so precise.

OK...it appears Mr Lloyd is wrong.  I measured all of my runners.  7.6mm  He says they are 8mm which is easy to find 8mm rods. Hmmmmm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As noted in this thread, there's no standard between makes (and even within makes) for tailstock bores. Checking with my normal supplier here, they have 7.50mm and then 7.70mm, haha, McMaster in the states only has whole metric sizes and then in inch they get close with 02.969", which would be sloppy, or 0.302" which would require lapping off almost 0.003" and that's a lot more than it sounds.

 

Just a note on drilling "perfectly concentric" holes- it's much harder than it seems. You have to think in terms of percentage; if I center and drill an arbor for a 0.15mm pivot, and the drilling wanders off center 2 %, that's a total of 0.003mm, which is almost imperceptible under 10x magnification and wouldn't adversely affect anything unless it was some crazy tiny watch. At circuit board drill size, 1/8", that 2% would be over 6 hundredths of a mm, and that's starting to be a lot. In the precision machining world if you want a hole on-size and on-location there are a number of steps you can take, from using highly specialized drills in awesome machines (with speeds and feeds optimized etc.), or you would drill undersize, bore about 1 diameter deep to just  the next drill size, which would be maybe 0.10mm undersize of final, and then ream to final size. You can also bore to final size if wanted.

 

Sometimes the drill really does stay centered, and even drill on size, and even make a round hole, but if you're counting on it it usually doesn't, haha.

 

I have a drill chuck that pretty much stays in my collet holding tailstock. It's not perfect; under the scope I can see it almost always holds the drill slightly off, but when drilling (using the scope), I just nudge the chuck with my finger and regularly drill 0.10mm holes without issue. I keep the drill chuck as it's fast, and otherwise the tailstock doesn't reach far enough with the slide rest in place, which I use as much as humanly possible.

 

The fellow's idea isn't bad though. If you want to do it, you could find an easily available rod size like maybe 1/4", and make up some rings out of Delrin that fit the front and back of the tailstock bore, so the rod is a light sliding fit. As for a set screw, there won't be much material to thread, and if the bore in your rod is just a little loose the screw will skew the drill. You could make a clamp that's just a ring with a set screw; if the bore is close (easy to get a 1/8" reamer) it should clamp fine without splitting the end, but you could also run a slit down the middle of the rod along the bore, and the clamp will squeeze the two sides together on the drill.

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

As noted in this thread, there's no standard between makes (and even within makes) for tailstock bores. Checking with my normal supplier here, they have 7.50mm and then 7.70mm, haha, McMaster in the states only has whole metric sizes and then in inch they get close with 02.969", which would be sloppy, or 0.302" which would require lapping off almost 0.003" and that's a lot more than it sounds.

 

Just a note on drilling "perfectly concentric" holes- it's much harder than it seems. You have to think in terms of percentage; if I center and drill an arbor for a 0.15mm pivot, and the drilling wanders off center 2 %, that's a total of 0.003mm, which is almost imperceptible under 10x magnification and wouldn't adversely affect anything unless it was some crazy tiny watch. At circuit board drill size, 1/8", that 2% would be over 6 hundredths of a mm, and that's starting to be a lot. In the precision machining world if you want a hole on-size and on-location there are a number of steps you can take, from using highly specialized drills in awesome machines (with speeds and feeds optimized etc.), or you would drill undersize, bore about 1 diameter deep to just  the next drill size, which would be maybe 0.10mm undersize of final, and then ream to final size. You can also bore to final size if wanted.

 

Sometimes the drill really does stay centered, and even drill on size, and even make a round hole, but if you're counting on it it usually doesn't, haha.

 

I have a drill chuck that pretty much stays in my collet holding tailstock. It's not perfect; under the scope I can see it almost always holds the drill slightly off, but when drilling (using the scope), I just nudge the chuck with my finger and regularly drill 0.10mm holes without issue. I keep the drill chuck as it's fast, and otherwise the tailstock doesn't reach far enough with the slide rest in place, which I use as much as humanly possible.

 

The fellow's idea isn't bad though. If you want to do it, you could find an easily available rod size like maybe 1/4", and make up some rings out of Delrin that fit the front and back of the tailstock bore, so the rod is a light sliding fit. As for a set screw, there won't be much material to thread, and if the bore in your rod is just a little loose the screw will skew the drill. You could make a clamp that's just a ring with a set screw; if the bore is close (easy to get a 1/8" reamer) it should clamp fine without splitting the end, but you could also run a slit down the middle of the rod along the bore, and the clamp with squeeze the two sides together on the drill.

Lots to chew on here. I did find some 7.6mm stock in China, so I ordered yesterday. I got enough to do experiments.

Your "finger nudge" method is the one I have used a few times. My tapered collet holder that fits in the runner is a little off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are issues with that method, not yet mentioned:

- after having bored the tailstock rod, you have to use it always in that same position (use a mark for alignment). With turning the rod, you will lose your center.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
    • thinking of where epilam should be removed did you know there was a patent that covers this? At least for the escapement I'm attaching it. GB1057607A-1 epilame.pdf
    • Back home...printing now.  Will report results
    • Oh well, if Master @nickelsilver says it's the way to go, then it is the way to go! I stand corrected! 🫡 Are there any other places where you're supposed to remove the epilame from the contact point of rubbing? I don't think so! Thanks for the effort @Neverenoughwatches, much appreciated! 🙂👍
×
×
  • Create New...