Jump to content

WW Lathe tailstock drill modification--seems very clever


Recommended Posts

I got this book by Rod Lloyd about fixing Atmos clocks.  He has a separate section on clock repair in general.

He presents this idea of taking a piece of 8mm round stock that fits in a WW tailstock and using the headstock, drills a hole that will fit a PCB drill bit.  By drilling the hole with the headstock, perfect alignment is guaranteed.  Now the thing missing is, how do you secure the drill bit.  The implication is that each runner is a one off bit.  Maybe I am wrong.

Why not put a set screw into the runner (would have to be removed to remove the runner, of course)?

Anybody done this?

I have a collet holder that fists my tailstock runner, but is not so precise.

OK...it appears Mr Lloyd is wrong.  I measured all of my runners.  7.6mm  He says they are 8mm which is easy to find 8mm rods. Hmmmmm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As noted in this thread, there's no standard between makes (and even within makes) for tailstock bores. Checking with my normal supplier here, they have 7.50mm and then 7.70mm, haha, McMaster in the states only has whole metric sizes and then in inch they get close with 02.969", which would be sloppy, or 0.302" which would require lapping off almost 0.003" and that's a lot more than it sounds.

 

Just a note on drilling "perfectly concentric" holes- it's much harder than it seems. You have to think in terms of percentage; if I center and drill an arbor for a 0.15mm pivot, and the drilling wanders off center 2 %, that's a total of 0.003mm, which is almost imperceptible under 10x magnification and wouldn't adversely affect anything unless it was some crazy tiny watch. At circuit board drill size, 1/8", that 2% would be over 6 hundredths of a mm, and that's starting to be a lot. In the precision machining world if you want a hole on-size and on-location there are a number of steps you can take, from using highly specialized drills in awesome machines (with speeds and feeds optimized etc.), or you would drill undersize, bore about 1 diameter deep to just  the next drill size, which would be maybe 0.10mm undersize of final, and then ream to final size. You can also bore to final size if wanted.

 

Sometimes the drill really does stay centered, and even drill on size, and even make a round hole, but if you're counting on it it usually doesn't, haha.

 

I have a drill chuck that pretty much stays in my collet holding tailstock. It's not perfect; under the scope I can see it almost always holds the drill slightly off, but when drilling (using the scope), I just nudge the chuck with my finger and regularly drill 0.10mm holes without issue. I keep the drill chuck as it's fast, and otherwise the tailstock doesn't reach far enough with the slide rest in place, which I use as much as humanly possible.

 

The fellow's idea isn't bad though. If you want to do it, you could find an easily available rod size like maybe 1/4", and make up some rings out of Delrin that fit the front and back of the tailstock bore, so the rod is a light sliding fit. As for a set screw, there won't be much material to thread, and if the bore in your rod is just a little loose the screw will skew the drill. You could make a clamp that's just a ring with a set screw; if the bore is close (easy to get a 1/8" reamer) it should clamp fine without splitting the end, but you could also run a slit down the middle of the rod along the bore, and the clamp will squeeze the two sides together on the drill.

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

As noted in this thread, there's no standard between makes (and even within makes) for tailstock bores. Checking with my normal supplier here, they have 7.50mm and then 7.70mm, haha, McMaster in the states only has whole metric sizes and then in inch they get close with 02.969", which would be sloppy, or 0.302" which would require lapping off almost 0.003" and that's a lot more than it sounds.

 

Just a note on drilling "perfectly concentric" holes- it's much harder than it seems. You have to think in terms of percentage; if I center and drill an arbor for a 0.15mm pivot, and the drilling wanders off center 2 %, that's a total of 0.003mm, which is almost imperceptible under 10x magnification and wouldn't adversely affect anything unless it was some crazy tiny watch. At circuit board drill size, 1/8", that 2% would be over 6 hundredths of a mm, and that's starting to be a lot. In the precision machining world if you want a hole on-size and on-location there are a number of steps you can take, from using highly specialized drills in awesome machines (with speeds and feeds optimized etc.), or you would drill undersize, bore about 1 diameter deep to just  the next drill size, which would be maybe 0.10mm undersize of final, and then ream to final size. You can also bore to final size if wanted.

 

Sometimes the drill really does stay centered, and even drill on size, and even make a round hole, but if you're counting on it it usually doesn't, haha.

 

I have a drill chuck that pretty much stays in my collet holding tailstock. It's not perfect; under the scope I can see it almost always holds the drill slightly off, but when drilling (using the scope), I just nudge the chuck with my finger and regularly drill 0.10mm holes without issue. I keep the drill chuck as it's fast, and otherwise the tailstock doesn't reach far enough with the slide rest in place, which I use as much as humanly possible.

 

The fellow's idea isn't bad though. If you want to do it, you could find an easily available rod size like maybe 1/4", and make up some rings out of Delrin that fit the front and back of the tailstock bore, so the rod is a light sliding fit. As for a set screw, there won't be much material to thread, and if the bore in your rod is just a little loose the screw will skew the drill. You could make a clamp that's just a ring with a set screw; if the bore is close (easy to get a 1/8" reamer) it should clamp fine without splitting the end, but you could also run a slit down the middle of the rod along the bore, and the clamp with squeeze the two sides together on the drill.

Lots to chew on here. I did find some 7.6mm stock in China, so I ordered yesterday. I got enough to do experiments.

Your "finger nudge" method is the one I have used a few times. My tapered collet holder that fits in the runner is a little off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are issues with that method, not yet mentioned:

- after having bored the tailstock rod, you have to use it always in that same position (use a mark for alignment). With turning the rod, you will lose your center.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I read that same article last night  H.  I think epilame is too much headache for me, sources aren't always accurate, some conflicting. Such is the GRAVITY of this situation, Is it ok if i just STICK  to a thixotropic oil 🤣
    • Not sure I follow along. As I stated in one of my previous posts, the epilame will remain intact between rubbing parts as long as the surface is lubricated by oil or grease. Maybe it's just a coincidence, but note how the epilame-treated surface is illustrated in @Waggy's post. It looks like the oil is exposed to a binder (epilame!) so that it can't move sideways.
    • The epilame under the oil will also be removed  Unless the oil makes a barrier between the epilame and the escape teeth 😅 I think i need two strong coffees now 🤣
    • If we use the rub-off epilame method of pallet stones (run dry for a few minutes before applying the epilame) where will the oil go/be transported when it is pushed away from the impulse surface by the escape wheel teeth? Onto the epilame-treated sections of the pallet! Once the oil has been applied/transported to the epilame-treated sections of the pallet where will it then go? Nowhere as the oil will remain on the epilame. So, perhaps the run-dry method defeats its intended purpose leaving the pallet impulse surfaces dry!? If, on the other hand, we do not remove the epilame from the pallet stones where the escape wheel teeth come in contact with them I'd expect more oil to remain where we want it and need it. Yes, I agree, that is the question, and my gut feeling tells me that is exactly the case. Epilame was created to have an adhesive trait and the oleophobic property is just a side effect.  
    • Might that be the viscous nature of oil resisting gravity H  ,  we have been comparing water and hydrophobic surfaces which are similar in principle but water is much less viscous than oil. I guess what we trying to discover is if epilame also has an adhesive trait as well as being oleophobic. Plus the oil dropet has very little mass for gravity to work on, like watching tiny water beads that can grip onto vertical glass until they are connected together to increase their mass then run down. Gravity isn't the only factor at play when oil is placed on pallet stones. The oil receives a lot of bashing that may push it out of position ? Thinking about it if the oil stays in position for 10 minutes enough time for the escape wheel to scrape off the epilame , then  a walled in lubrication has been achieved,  the epilame is no longer beneath the oil ( possibly mixed into the oil )
×
×
  • Create New...