Jump to content

Waltham desk clock disassembly method?


Recommended Posts

Here is a clock from my inheritance.  It still has the customer ticket attached and it appears to have been from the very early days of my dad's business.

It is ticking, but not keeping good time.  I want to service it but am confounded by its construction.

Hoping maybe someone has seen this before and can offer advice on taking it apart.  I dont want to break it through experimentation.

The winding key also functions as the setting key...like a watch, so that means the long stem is mechanically attached to the watch and there is no detent or screw visible to release it.

The sight hole exposes the regulator, so it is not associated with disassembly.

I show front view, bottom view, and back view.

2022-07-06 07_28_11-20220706_072432.jpg ‎- Photos.png

2022-07-06 07_28_30-20220706_072424.jpg ‎- Photos.png

2022-07-06 07_28_45-20220706_072415.jpg ‎- Photos.png

2022-07-06 07_29_03-20220706_072608.jpg ‎- Photos.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

Hi First one I have seen looks like a big pocket watch. The peripheral screws on the cover look like the entry point to release the back cover .

First removing the hardware on the bottom as shown.  Then removing the two screws that hold the dial plate (two screws are missing), the whole mechanism should slip out.

That still leaves the issue of removing the stem. 

I am moving slowly so as not to mess this up.

procedure 1.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me this looks like a hand made put together movement and case. Unscrew this section and you should be able to remove movement from case. Remove hands and see if the movement is held to the dial by a center screw. 

1129083471_2022-07-0607_29_03-20220706_072608.jpg-Photos.png.515dc13898b430c3d2876d4df534092a.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

To me this looks like a hand made put together movement and case. Unscrew this section and you should be able to remove movement from case. Remove hands and see if the movement is held to the dial by a center screw. 

1129083471_2022-07-0607_29_03-20220706_072608.jpg-Photos.png.515dc13898b430c3d2876d4df534092a.jpg

I have found this clock on the web, so it is not a one off. 

You suggestion is my current plan. It is running fine but I am dying to see inside

Link to comment
Share on other sites

llooks like a weird version of a  Waltham  car clock.  Now is the car clock the back would unscrew off the movement but I can't quite tell from the pictures whether that's going to be true or not..

iif it's the car clock it's just a  really big pocket watch.  A very large pocket watch that I'm not a fan of..  But if it is the car clock you should be able to remove the stem that should come out like a standard pocket watch them.. In the movement comes out however it's mounted and then  you can see how it comes out of the case..

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

that's going to be true or not..

No, because, even though there are three screws that release the cover from the dial, the stem goes through a hole and there is no way for the cover to removed before removing the stem.

The stem locks in two positions...just like a wristwatch, so there is something engaged with the stem so that the movement is not going to just slide away (like on some, or perhaps most, pocket watches).  I just feel like something has to release the stem from the movement.

rear cover.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Finally got back to this today.  So trivial.  I just removed those nuts at the bottom and the whole stem assembly slides out.  LOL.

Here is the movement.  I am printing a movement holder for it so that I can work on it today.

2022-10-07 11_06_46-20221007_105455.jpg ‎- Photos.png

On 7/7/2022 at 6:54 AM, LittleWatchShop said:

The stem locks in two positions...just like a wristwatch, so there is something engaged with the stem so that the movement is not going to just slide away (like on some, or perhaps most, pocket watches).  I just feel like something has to release the stem from the movement.

As it turns out, the stem just slides out.  No stem-release required.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, oldhippy said:

Look out for wear in the trains pivot holes as its not jeweled and the pivots too for roughness. 

you have to be careful with this watch because as pointed out it is basically a seven jewel movement. Then it has two really huge mainsprings driving a intermediate wheel and then that drives the center wheel. it basically is a very peculiar watch but despite all that power the seven jewel version can definitely have running issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

you have to be careful with this watch because as pointed out it is basically a seven jewel movement. Then it has two really huge mainsprings driving a intermediate wheel and then that drives the center wheel. it basically is a very peculiar watch but despite all that power the seven jewel version can definitely have running issues.

Yeah, those mainsprings, have not figured out how they work together, but I haven't tried to analyze it yet. A new adventure! I love this stuff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh yeah, I see.  The two mainsprings are running in parallel.  Interesting.  I guess this was somehow better than one larger, more powerful, mainspring.

This movement has no jewels.

---------

I think the first time I took power off, one of the wheels (not pivot) got bent a little.  I have corrected it for the most part. 

There is no easy way to take power off on this movement.  The click is hidden, and because the two springs are in parallel and not equal, there can be tension on one and not the other.

Edited by LittleWatchShop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

The two mainsprings are running in parallel.  Interesting.  I guess this was somehow better than one larger, more powerful, mainspring.

This movement has no jewels.

I have a friend who clicks military timepieces so I ended up working on the occasionally and to be honest I absolutely despise us. They're basically to deck watches over very common and that's the one by Hamilton which has a really big mainspring it's about 3 feet long and then there's Waltham and one big mainspring like Hamilton has so much better than this arrangement. but for Waltham it's a popular design they were found in car clocks military timepieces your clock they made a law to use of these.

then there is no jewels on the gear train but there is the standard seven jewels.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks Ross, yes i remember the broken arbor screw you had to deal with. Dont give up, if i can drill a tiny hole in a bloody hard barrel arbor without breaking the drill bit then you'll get that screw out one day somehow .
    • Isn't it most correct to say that the mixture of radium decay pathway compounds found in old lume will produce both alpha and beta particle radiation as well as gamma rays, so it's over-simplistic to dismiss it all as low-energy particle emission? True, a cheap geiger counter chirping away with a raw CPM count won't specifically give you the relevant biological dose, but it makes it easy to tell the difference between your local background, a watch with a bit of activity, and one that is comparatively quite active. Each person can make their own risk analysis based on their understanding and concern, but there's nothing wrong with using an inexpensive meter to help make the determination.
    • A lesson I learned last month on a Junghans pocket watch where both pins were bent over like stalks of wheat in the wind. I bent them back straight, wondering what a shock the thing must have taken to somehow bend even the outside pin over. And then the escapement wouldn't unlock at all. Probably the pallet stones are too long but I'm not ready for that repair yet so I bent the pins back over and it runs 0/0.2
    • Never. Brilliant work and photographs. Thank you. On my very first watch I knackered the arbour. I think the screw I put in was the crown screw. I didn't know about left handed screws then. Head sheared off. Thread broken just below surface. If I had the space, then a lathe would be my wished purchase. 2 1/2 years later and I still get the arbour out now and again and...... I can dream. It's a lovely pocket watch. Ah well. 
    • Hello Davis. This thread is interesting. Thought I'd add my twopenneth worth. A short while ago I had a similar problem to you. Not a broken banking pin, but I did alter a banking pin. Much to the consternation of members. Rightly so. However I did as they suggested and obtained a complete donor movement and installed it into the watch. The client, who I did not charge but did the work as a project for myself, was as happy as Larry.  Can you not look for watch of the same name? A Donor watch or movement.  Keep us posted on your result please.
×
×
  • Create New...