Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi guys,

I have here a Seiko 7006-7002 (7006A) and I’m not sure how to remove the movement from the case.
I removed the gasket, spacer ring and crown and stem but the movement is not dropping out when I turn it upside down. If I grab the post by the click and try to move the movement, it’s not budging whatsoever, not even the slightest of movements, as if it was welded.
If you look at the close up image, you will see another ring below the movement. If I loosen the dial screws (now closed again), I can rotate this ring, within the recess in the ring, and from what I can see, it doesn’t go into the case, it looks like the whole thing should come out when I turn it upside down.
If you look carefully, you will see my finger (the pink lines) between the ring and the case so that makes me think it isn’t a front loader because there is nothing in the way and I guess the recess in the ring is there because of the tube being in the way so it can come out of the case but it isn’t coming out.
Is this a front loader?

 

PZZA3240.JPG

PZZA3243.JPG

Posted
58 minutes ago, PeterS said:

Is this a front loader?

I don’t think so, because Seiko 5 construction "rules" do not allow that, but you need to post pictures from the top and side to tell. Also, on Seiko there is a framed code on the caseback which indicates the construction type.

  • Like 2
Posted

Hi.

If it's like all of my Seiko 5's then it should just drop out the back but sometimes the thin plastic dial spacer you noticed is a bit of a fiddle to keep in place, especially if it's cracked and some watch rebuilders use glue, and it the use too much glue it can stick the ring, dial and movement to the case, I wonder if this is what's happened with yours, might just need a touch of brute force and ignorance to break the glues grip, should just need a slight twist of the movement to break it's grip on the case.

  • Like 1
Posted

Thank you for getting back to me guys, much appreciated.

I’ve attached the pictures, if you need any additional ones, let me know. I note that there is a lip on the bezel at 6 o'clock for easy removal of the bezel.

If I loosen the dial feet, the movement is moving and the ring that’s between the movement and the dial also moves but the dial keeps it all in place, at least that’s what it seems what is holding it.

Kalanag – I think you can help because I have exactly the same watch.

 

PZZA3246.JPG

PZZA3247.JPG

PZZA3248.JPG

PZZA3249.JPG

PZZA3250.JPG

Posted

The movement shouldn't be able to move just by loosening the dial feet screws, the dial feet should stop it moving, if you can move the movement independent to the dial the feet must be broken so glue may be involved to stop the dial moving, if the dial is glued then the movement will not come out because the hands are in the way, you may get lucky removing the bezel but it my just be cosmetic with the crystal still attached to the case.

I suppose you could try refitting the back and using compressed are through the winding stem hole to pop the crystal out, provided you have access to compressed air, it can be done with a large syringe but I have only seen that work on a case were the crystal was designed to pop out, ie with a front loader.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, PeterS said:

…Kalanag – I think you can help because I have exactly the same watch.

 

I found the photos looking up the case number in the www. Unfortunately I couldn‘t find any hints concerning the disassembly. It can be seen that there is no letter on the case back indicating the construction type. Your photos let me think that the bezel could be pried off. Have you tried that? I don’t think it’s a front loader. But if the crystal is off you can carefully push the movement from the front side.

Edited by Kalanag
  • Like 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, Kalanag said:

It can be seen that there is no letter on the case back indicating the construction type.

It is stamped letter A type, the framed 2 letters code came later. It's a very common regular case type. Front loaders watches have the dial wider than the case opening, which doesn't happen here. 

  • Like 2
Posted

Looking at the pictures again could it be something as simple as the Crown Tube has been pushed in too far and is touching the movement, something looks amiss about it to me. 

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Paul80 said:

Looking at the pictures again could it be something as simple as the Crown Tube has been pushed in too far and is touching the movement, something looks amiss about it to me. 

There seems to be a gap between the crown tube and the movement, difficult to tell from the photos. 

  • Like 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

There seems to be a gap between the crown tube and the movement, difficult to tell from the photos. 

The crown tube keeps the mov.t down in place. It is removed lifting the opposite side, and refitted the reverse way. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Many thanks to all of you for your help.
The movement is out of the case. I took the bezel off and used crystal lift.
It wasn’t easy, it didn’t want to go, I had to use quite a lot of force to get the crystal out but it’s out now and I can get on with the rest.

  • Like 1
Posted

So what in your opinion was the cause for the movement not coming out ?  Was it a front loader , was the dial seized in and the removal of the bezel/crystal allowed it to move forward.?

Posted

I think it was the dial, I'm not 100% sure but I think that's what it was. As soon as I removed the bezel and the crystal there was no issue removing it. I don't think it was the crown tube. There is a recess in the ring for the tube and if you look at the very first images, you can see a clear gap there with my finger prints showing so the tube wasn't obstructing it.
No damage to the dial or anything except the second hand is slightly bent, nothing major. I used a crystal lift to get it out and it's not ideal for tension rings but it's out now. I of course couldn't lift it with the crystal lift and I had to hold it horizontally and twist (for about two minutes) hence not a surprise that the second hand looks like a pocket watch minute hand. I'm glad it wasn't the hour or minute hand.

Posted

The crown tube still looks like it's been pushed to far in.

You can see in the picture, it might not be touching the movement but it does encroach over the dial, that may be enough to stop it just dropping out as it should.

Still you got there in the end, did the crystal lift do any damage to the crystal as the tension ring would hinder the correct working of the lift or did you get lucky ?

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I think you're right, the tube doesn't look quite right but that wasn't the issue. The movement wouldn't move at all. The only thing I could grab safely was the post by the click which I did with my tweezers to give it a bit of a wiggle but it was like as if it was welded, there was no movement at all, completely solid. If it was the tube there would be some movement and the tube would obstruct it from coming out but that wasn't the case. I didn't touch the tube and when I removed the crystal the movement dropped out.

Difficult to say with the crystal and the crystal lift. I was wondering the same when I was tightening the lift really hard what the crystal is going to look like but the crystal is in such a state that I can't tell. It doesn't look any worse than the rest of the crystal so I think the claws didn't mark it too much if at all. Certainly no cracks or anything like that. I was surprised.

Edited by PeterS
Posted

Hi Peter  jus for the sake of it have you tried to pop the movemrnt back in as is  just to see how it rsts in the case. Is there a lip that the dial rests on and is held by the crystal and bezel. Its a bit puzzling thats all. did it drop out thr front or the back ?  If it came out thro thr front  it looks like a front loader . was it a split stem ? .  cheers

Posted

Once it was out was there any sign that the dial had been glued into place or did it simply just drop out once the crystal was removed.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Guys, I’m so sorry replying a month later, so embarrassing. I don’t get the notification emails anymore that someone replied to a thread I’m following even though I’ve not changed my email or anything as far as I know (as I’m getting older I sometimes do things and I forget I’ve done them).

It’s been serviced now and it goes in the case and out of the case no problem at all and it sits inside the case and against the crystal perfectly.
It came out of the back. There is a spacer between the dial and the movement that’s removed when the dial is off. The dial rests against the crystal, it doesn’t move when it’s inside so I don’t think there was any need to glue it so I’m not entirely sure what the problem was, I couldn’t see any signs of glue anywhere, I don’t think it was glued but there could have been a tiny dab of CA glue here and there, who knows. Most importantly it’s fine now.

Thank you for your help guys and I do apologies for replying so late, I only saw your posts when I went back to this thread to look at the images of the same watch Kalang posted. I wish I was getting the notification emails when people reply to threads I’m following.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • One of the problems with trying to Photograph Phils things are that his enjoyment was building these things so they tended to E falls on what will see if I can find some earlier pictures or any pictures I wasn't even sure because I was looking for that specific picture for somebody else and even it got the last version and that would have been the last version. You will note that he put the indexing on something that he could unscrew it or whatever and it can slide back out of the way so the rest of the lathe can be used as a lathe. With the lathe cut are actually coming down from the top I was there once where he demonstrated how to cut a pivot with the setup it was really beautiful. Older set up if I remember it's not a worm gear assembly in the thing in between the stepping motor and the holding block I believe this particular one was like a 100 to 1 gear ratio. Earlier version with watchmaker's lathe. Even looks like he is the watchmakers bed and then switch to something he made. Then I do have other pictures and things of the rotary stage in use. In the raw so if you tube videos here is an example of one were somebody's mounting a three jaw chuck. At one time there were available on eBay they were not cheap but if you're patient like I was I found one cheap on eBay. After you watch the video it look at his other videos he is a whole bunch of other examples of the same rotary stage. That I do know there are other pictures examples and possibly videos you just have to track them down. One of the minor issues of finding this particular tech sheet for the unit is I believe it was a custom manufacturer and the company change their name but I remember the new name here's a link to the company https://www.ondrivesus.com/rino-mechanical-components                
    • Escapement adjusting always interesting and depending upon the reference always confusing. Okay maybe it's not always confusing but it does lead to confusion. I have a PDF below it's actually a whole bunch of separate stuff including a hand out that came from a lecture that's on you tube. Then from that we get this image Consequences of doing things especially if you do things out of order or you do things for the wrong reason. Oh and even if the watches working I made the mistake one so showing my boss how tweaking the banking pins on a full plate on the timing machine made the amplitude get better and now he thinks that's what they're for and I don't think a fully grasped exactly what horn clearance means. Consequence of doing things. Notice what it says about opening and closing the banking pins and total lock? So yes I've had that on a full plate where it won't unlock at all and that's the banking pins or a combination of things basically. So banking pins unfortunately get moved. One of the ways to tell if it's been moved is the look straight down at the end of the fork with the balance wheel removed. Power on the fork push at the one side look at it push it to the other side also look at it and compare anything with the center reference the balance jewel and see if both sides of the same. No guarantee after the same there in the right place but at least are the same typically when people play with things one side will be way off from the other because they had no idea what they were doing at all because of course it's a full plate and you really have to paying attention and even then there's still hard to do. Then the other thing that comes up like it shows below is people often adjust the banking pins to do all those other things as opposed to horn clearance which is all that it's therefore and maybe bonus Guard pin clearance although you're supposed to deal with the guard pin is a separate thing like single roller gets bent in Or out or sometimes physically gets moved in and out. Some full plates older escapement's typically pallet forks held together with screws and you can actually unscrew and move the entire assembly in Or out more complications to deal with.     Escapement handout wostep nscc.pdf
    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
    • I have acquired a Citizen Leopard 36000 watch. My reason for purchasing it was my desire to own a timepiece with a 36,000 BPH movement, and the price was reasonable. Another motivating factor was gaining hands-on experience with the mechanism. The watch is in good condition, but I intend to fully disassemble it for maintenance. First and foremost, if anyone has prior experience with this particular model, I would greatly appreciate their insights. I do not have access to Citizen’s specialized lubricants and will need to use the ones available to me, such as 9010, 8000, and 8300 grease. Additionally, I do not possess the appropriate oil for the pallet jewels and will only be able to clean them.
×
×
  • Create New...