Jump to content

Seiko 4843-8100 movement/dial removal


Recommended Posts

I need to deep clean my 4843-8100, i got the case back off and the stem out, but the movement won't budge, the few movements I've removed before has all pretty much just fallen out. What am I missing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're right about the deep clean!  It could just be wedged by gunk.

The case code on the back should tell you how to open it.  Take a look at the dial. If it's larger than the opening on the back then that's a pretty good sign it's supposed to go out the front.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cant seem to find a case guide for this movement, but i did find this:

http://akiyose.com/battery-exchange/seiko/grand/grand4843-8050-1.html

It is the earlier A version of the movement, but it looks similar.

unfortunatly it does not show how to remove dial and movement, but it looks like he did it through the back. 

i also found this

https://seikoserviceusa.com/uploads/datasheets/4823A.pdf

If i am not mistaken its the king quartz version.

It looks like this is the ring holding the movement:

 

ring.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It probably predates the case type being put on the back, which Seiko started doing in 1978.  They used to list each case number in the casing guide book, but you'd have to find one new enough for your watch to be in it but not so new they case number index is gone.  So probably not going to happen.

The one in the first link must have come out the back.  The dial looks no larger, or maybe even smaller, than the movement spacer ring.  And on the photos looking into the empty case, you can clearly see the diameter is smaller on the front.  Which is typical Seiko construction for a watch like this.

I think that ring is just gunked into place.  The probably fits around the movement, and might have a flange the fits between the movement and the dial.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, xyzzy said:

It probably predates the case type being put on the back, which Seiko started doing in 1978.  They used to list each case number in the casing guide book, but you'd have to find one new enough for your watch to be in it but not so new they case number index is gone.  So probably not going to happen.

The one in the first link must have come out the back.  The dial looks no larger, or maybe even smaller, than the movement spacer ring.  And on the photos looking into the empty case, you can clearly see the diameter is smaller on the front.  Which is typical Seiko construction for a watch like this.

I think that ring is just gunked into place.  The probably fits around the movement, and might have a flange the fits between the movement and the dial.

Figured it out, The ring was supposed to be "un screwed", but it was sort of rusted shut. I proceeded with some "mild persuasion" and now its out. Now i just have to figure out how to get the ring lose so that i can take an angle grinder to it... Suspect the dial have to come of from the movement.

Edited by jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • one little minor problem with your chemistry experiment here which is what exactly is epilam? In other words is it an exact substance with the chemical you specify or is it a term? For instance originally it was steric acid either dissolved in some sort of solvent or it was applied by vaporizing it. Then now it's all kinds of different things the watch companies all have different ideas there's a whole bunch of patents. So is not always an exact substance.   let me snip out a image from the patent that I attached up above. Notice I highlighted something it seems to disagree with your evaluation.  
    • I guess You had to try, as it would be hard to sleep without that try, but, I know the result before the experiment... As I told before, the friction will be so big that the wheel will not turn. The pivots have to be thin and polished - the bigger the number of the wheel (2th, 3gh, 4th...), the thinner the pivot. What You are trying to do is possible, but forming the new thin pivot must be done on lathe. Thus the wheel will get shorter, but can have new pivot without the drilling for normal standard repivoting. Then piece of brass can be soldered under the pivot hole in the bridge and new hole drilled in it to form the new bearing.  Well, this way is not the recommended one, not quite correct, but it is possible to do for the excersize... When I say lathe, lathe may be verry simple, someting like turns, but made of what one has in reach of his hands. If You want to try, I will try to guide
    • yes by all means let's gather up our weapons tar feathers find the nearest tree in case Mark is not agreeable to our terms on our demands and storm his Castle. I don't quite understand what you're trying to do here? In other words you want Mark to somehow guarantee that the group will live on forever no matter what? You want Mark to somehow change his business model of what is trying to do or should we just take the group away from him? oh and is quite possible that Mark never realized that his discussion group would take on a life of its own. That the members of the group would like to continue on forever.  
    • I'm not sentimental, I see it this way.  I inherit something I  don't like, I could sell it, buy something I do like and remember the person with the new item.  For example, I  inherit a watch ( I haven't), I don't like it, I  buy a watch I do like, every time I look at the watch, I think of the person. 
    • A lot of it has to do with a generations attitude.  Have we reached a generation of folk yet that have no sentimental values ie. Just an object to sell . I expect my kids will sell my collection , maybe keep one valued piece. Not being in the game very long, i have no idea when the sale of old watches boomed or if it has even reached its peak yet. If we go back 20 years what were ebay sales like then, expense wise and volume ?
×
×
  • Create New...