Jump to content

Old v. NOS Mainspring?


Recommended Posts

I thought that if I purchased a replacement mainspring, it would arrive wound such that I could pop it into the barrel without having to use a winder. The spring that I received isn't packaged like that and somebody elsewhere suggested that as old as it is, it may have taken on a "set". So, were I to use the NOS spring, will it get the tightly wound curve around the arbor from being wound in the winder or will I have to do some prep to it prior to feeding it into the winder? Would I be better off putting the old spring back in? While it looks ok, the coil doesn't seem to be a uniform spiral.

both springs.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The one on the left is the old spring. The one in the package is the NOS spring which is contained in a cardboard ring of approx. 1.125" ID. The NOS spring does indeed have a pre-curved interior curve that approximates the curve of the old spring's arbor attachment end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d use the new spring. The old one doesn’t look awful, but it is fairly “set”. 
 

If you are lucky then the new spring’s ring will be narrower than the barrel. If not, then remove first and use a spring winder. 
 

The hooking end that wraps around the arbor is annealed and will conform to the arbor of the winder or the watch barrel without intervention usually. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/7/2022 at 10:58 AM, grsnovi said:

t would arrive wound such that I could pop it into the barrel without having to use a winder.

Nice fantasy are having today?

You didn't show the viewing audience something? This is an Elgin mainspring it doesn't have a tongue end sort of it has a T brace end. I have a picture below for those not familiar with what were dealing with. The best way to put these in is with the mainspring winder you wind the spring almost all the way into the winder you leave about an inch out. Then you insert the winder and the little but the spring into the barrel rotate until the T is over the slot. Press it down in the slot and verify that it actually is in their. Then with the back your tweezers or your biggest screwdriver hold the top of the T in place basically F just push it down then you can push the mainspring out of the one. Because you cannot just hope to pop this in place it will never go where it's supposed to and trying to rotated after the fact a lot of luck with that it just isn't I happen. Anything that has a protruding part like a T in any form really has to go in with a Winder.

Then I'm assuming that the right thickness of the spring that you needed? One of the problems with American pocket watch parts Elgin in particular is a part number were referred to a item but often times of common different thicknesses like mainsprings or staffs can have a lot of variations for the same part number she always at the careful of what you're getting to make sure it's right.

Elgin 817 18 size mainspring end.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks @JohnR725 It seems that the #817 was made in three different thicknesses. The one that was in the watch was 0.2mm. (as measured on my "inch" dial caliper) The one that I rec'd is 0.197mm. (I suppose I could be off by 0.003mm) I guess we'll see how it goes. Will report back once I've either succeeded or failed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • …then again it could be a recase. 
    • As a child/young person, I remember how the police sometimes appeared in the middle of a country road and blocked off the traffic. A few minutes later, a fighter jet flew over our heads (loudly and respectfully, almost making us crap our pants), landed in front of us and was towed into the forest. It made us feel safe. I just realized that I've come a long way from demagnetizing watch movements, but isn't that the charm of associations and discussions? Anyway, I'll stick to the topic from here on! Yeah, we decided to stop developing nukes in the late 50s and spend the money on conventional weapons instead. Oops, sorry moderators, I seem to have a problem controlling myself. No more now. I promise.
    • Hi everyone Anyone have any ideas what this caliber is? Is it a genuine B & M as I understand the market is flooded with copies? Thanks.
    • You know it H Ours was scrapped early 60s. Nothing wrong with joining the army H , i would have love the physical and discipline side of it, but i can't follow or be lead by numpties.
    • That's exactly why you need to exercise, or you'll meet with an untimely death! 😉 Well, good thing you weren't born in my neck of the woods then as you would have no choice. Back in the day when it was time for my service (early 80s) this small country could mobilize 800,000 soldiers in a few days, and mobilization supplies with modern weapons and munitions were everywhere and we had an air force second to none. Then beginning in the 90s it was scrapped because our politicians decided that Russia would become a Western democracy. In discussions with colleagues, friends and acquaintances where I mentioned I thought it was imprudent to scrap our capacity for self-defense, I was laughed at. I wonder if anyone of those people would laugh today.
×
×
  • Create New...