Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

As I await the arrival of some horology-specific tools (and two old Elgin movements) I see that almost all videos on YouTube show a Timegrapher 1000, watch cleaning machine and main spring winder. Until I've actually torn a movement apart and put one back together I don't think I need a Timegrapher (just seeing a dead train moving again will be my goal). As for a cleaning machine: washing parts in small batches in glass petri dishes or jars will be my initial plan and simply shelling out 10 USD for a new mainspring will serve to eliminate the need for a spring winder. Part of me knows that I get obsessive about things but I also know that despite best intentions I'm likely to fail. I had this grand idea once upon a time that I was going to build a tube amplifier and subsequently better understand the circuits involved in guitar amps. I bought a kit and did indeed build a working amp but during the build I realized that I wasn't very handy with a soldering pencil. Some things I do well and others, well Malcolm Gladwell says you need 10,000 hours or so...

My biggest worry here is that my depth perception will impact my ability to grab screws with tweezers.

We should know by this time next week.

Patience

  • Like 1
Posted

Having worked on printed circuits for decades, soldering takes practice. I can solder much better than I can grab small screws with tweezers. There are a lot of things going on when you hand solder and its easy to lose control.

Its taken a couple of years but I can usually deal with small screws, even the ones in those tiny ladies seiko movements without launching. Its pretty obvious this hobby will test your patience.

One of the less expensive game changers for me was buying a set of real watchmaker tweezers. I realized the tweezers I used for surface mount assembly of circuit boards are too springy for watch work. 

The other big game changer for me was a stereo microscope. 

I still have a crappy set of mainspring winders. Some day I will buy the Bergeon set when I cant stand it any more.

Best of luck, take your time, enjoy.

Matt

  • Like 1
Posted

I should add there is an incredible amount of talent on this site always ready to answer questions in a friendly manner.

I cant image starting down the watchmaking trail without this site.

  • Like 1
Posted

Hi GRSNOVI  With watch repair  is not to try running  before you can walk, just take small bites at a time and as your profficiency and dexterity inprove and you gain confidence go thet step further. You will never be alone as the members here will always be at your elbow with  advice and help. I my self use my left eye with a loupe , no scope except  for the use  of parts and jewels for close inspection , For normal  work is done mostly one eyed. Depending on what I am doing soetimes use a binocular head band.  With practise with one eye you will be able to gain the depth perception no problem. Have confidence in your own ability.  As for tools collect them as you need them.  attached are a couple of documents to read.       All the very best.

1612608791_ToolsfortheHobbyist (2) (1).pdf TZIllustratedGlossary.pdf

  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, Nibbler said:

...There are a lot of things going on when you hand solder...

Thanks Matt!

I kept unsoldering what I had finished the day before (because I wasn't watching where else the soldering pencil was touching). In the end it all worked out. 🙂

Posted

There is an app called watch accuracy meter free to download on your smart phone, shows accuracy and beat error but not amplitude, it will do until you decide weather you want to invest in tools. Mainspring winder is not a must have tool for non pro work either. I must have overhauled at least five hundered movements before I heard of ultrasonic cleaning machines.  

A cheap or scrap movement and some basic tools to tear down and reassemble will do to begin with, Oh plus a  tooth brush and some lighter fluid.   I haven't lost a spring eversince I discovered zip loc bags.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
18 hours ago, grsnovi said:

My biggest worry here is that my depth perception will impact my ability to grab screws with tweezers.

Hi grsnovi. I was in your shoes at one point in time. In retrospec, my biggest regrets were:
1. Not getting a good tweezer. A simple Dumont No. 2 will do when starting out.
2. Not buying the Bergeon 4040 movement holder.

These two simple tools will vastly improve your experience working alone without a mentor.

Since you have experience soldering, I recommend using an affordable LCD microscope (used for PCB works) over using a traditional loupe, see:
https://www.aliexpress.com/wholesale?trafficChannel=main&d=y&CatId=0&SearchText=lcd+microscope&ltype=wholesale&SortType=total_tranpro_desc&groupsort=1

These microscopes can also video record you as you work. This will allow you to review what you were doing and help you when you reassemble the movement. I tend to forget which part goes where, so I find this feature very useful.

Posted

Thanks Zero!

I've got both a Dumont #2 and the Bergeon 4040 holder. I also have had experience with the USB digital microscopes from a previous life. We'll see how it goes.

Posted
13 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

There is an app called watch accuracy meter free to download...

Boy, it sure seems like there's an app for everything! I wouldn't have even thought to check for one for this. Thanks!

Posted
7 hours ago, oldhippy said:

You can only do your best...

True. As to clocks, I guess if I had grown up with mechanical clocks they'd be of more interest but alas my interest is in the little clocks we wear. I'm hoping that starting out on pocket watches will give me a taste and I'll figure out how suited I am to close work.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
    • I have acquired a Citizen Leopard 36000 watch. My reason for purchasing it was my desire to own a timepiece with a 36,000 BPH movement, and the price was reasonable. Another motivating factor was gaining hands-on experience with the mechanism. The watch is in good condition, but I intend to fully disassemble it for maintenance. First and foremost, if anyone has prior experience with this particular model, I would greatly appreciate their insights. I do not have access to Citizen’s specialized lubricants and will need to use the ones available to me, such as 9010, 8000, and 8300 grease. Additionally, I do not possess the appropriate oil for the pallet jewels and will only be able to clean them.
    • Hello all, I am working on an older Valjoux Chrono. It doesn't have a stamp on the movement anywhere but I believe it is a Valjoux 72. I installed the train of wheels and they will not turn. The problem appears to be the 4th wheel and the escape wheel are not interfacing correctly. I had to replace both of these parts as the pivots were broken on each. I sourced genuine Valjoux/ETA replacements. I think the problem is with the escape wheel as all the wheels turn perfectly if I remove just the escape wheel.  My question to those with more Valjoux experience is am I mistaken? Is this some other model altogether and I have the wrong part or parts?    
    • I would remove the wheels, check for damage and if not damaged, clean. 
×
×
  • Create New...