Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi

Is there a difference in the mainspring between cal. 601 and 610 Omega movement?

Cousinsuk.com refers to "1280" mainsping for both for the original part but different sizes for a non-original. 

Furthermore, Bidfun show difference in movement dimensions. 

I´m asking because I get a low amplitude and visually limited oscillation when inserting a 610 mainspring in a 601 during service,

Kind regards

Posted (edited)

Okay, so according to the table

Omega 601: H=1.05 T=0.12 L=360 D=9.5
Omega 610: H=1.10 T=0.11 L=340 D=10.0

Doesn´t it equalize by dimensions or does it make wrong impact to use 610 mainspring on a 610 movement? The balance spring doesn´t bounce enough. 

Edited by Khan
Posted

According to the tech sheets and looking at for the 601 and 610 Omega's recommending the same mainspring. According to the website below for each of the watches their recommending the same mainspring. According to the mainspring catalog were snipped out the watch mainsprings there is a slight difference the same difference and you have

Seeing as how Omega is recommending the same spring for both of them in looking at your dimensions I can't see that the mainspring  would make that much difference there so close in size.

So I'm assuming you a low amplitude before servicing is still have a low amplitude? Then visit change if it's in a different position like dial-up and dial down?

 

 

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=OME_601

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=OME_610

 

 

Omega 601 510 ms.JPG

Posted

I just checked the amplitude on the timegrapher:

Dial down: 281 

Dial up: 124

Very embarrassing results. But the balance runs freely when pallet fork uninstalled and the friction spring for the centre pivot doesn't look to make friction. And it feels like sufficient power in the pallet fork when turning it right and left without balance installed and fully wound. 🥴

Screenshot_20220320-193426.png

Screenshot_20220320-193430.png

Posted

 

I have enhanced your photo is best I can you really need to change the angle or change the contrast your machine because it's really hard to see what we need to see.

Is not the change much but your lift angles 49° by the way

1 hour ago, Khan said:

Dial down: 281 

Dial up: 124

Very embarrassing results. But the balance runs freely when pallet fork uninstalled and the friction spring for the centre pivot doesn't look to make friction. And it feels like sufficient power in the pallet fork when turning it right and left without balance installed and fully wound.

Dial-up and dial down should always be almost identical then it's always nice to have a least one crown position like crown down.

Just take the sweep second pinion out. It's not needed for the watch to run they will deal with the friction spring later.

Notice in the enhanced picture we can see the graphical display notice we don't see lines we see random dots? There might be a little bit of a pattern there but not very much. The timing machine relies on a good clean signal to give us proper numbers if we see random dots on the graphical display it tells us you're having a problem.. That means the numbers are basically invalid.

I would look really carefully at your hairspring. That's because this isn't really an amplitude issue despite with the timing machine says this is an issue of the escapement is not producing a nice ticking sound. the hairspring would be the most likely cause not entirely the only cause but the most likely cause.

 

 

graphical display versus numbers don't look right Omega 601 610.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
55 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

 

I have enhanced your photo is best I can you really need to change the angle or change the contrast your machine because it's really hard to see what we need to see.

Is not the change much but your lift angles 49° by the way

Dial-up and dial down should always be almost identical then it's always nice to have a least one crown position like crown down.

Just take the sweep second pinion out. It's not needed for the watch to run they will deal with the friction spring later.

Notice in the enhanced picture we can see the graphical display notice we don't see lines we see random dots? There might be a little bit of a pattern there but not very much. The timing machine relies on a good clean signal to give us proper numbers if we see random dots on the graphical display it tells us you're having a problem.. That means the numbers are basically invalid.

I would look really carefully at your hairspring. That's because this isn't really an amplitude issue despite with the timing machine says this is an issue of the escapement is not producing a nice ticking sound. the hairspring would be the most likely cause not entirely the only cause but the most likely cause.

 

 

graphical display versus numbers don't look right Omega 601 610.jpg

Maybe the hairspring is sitting too low? Or the coils are too close? Because it looks sticky when bouncing. 

Screenshot_20220320-215752.png

Screenshot_20220320-215747.png

Screenshot_20220320-215744.png

Posted

Casually the images look okay that doesn't mean they're okay it just means can't see from the picture anything that really jumps out is hideously bad. But we don't have the right angle to see if they hairspring is flat either.

10 hours ago, Khan said:

Because it looks sticky when bouncing. 

How did you clean the balance wheel and hairspring? And did you Demagnetized them?

Then I'm attaching some images? Did notice something peculiar which you can fix? Notice in one of the pictures that your balance wheel upside down it appears to be that the roller jewel is where it's supposed to be which is in alignment with one of the arms in the balance wheel. This works out really nice for putting the watch in beat? Then you notice the other image I assume the balance wheel wasn't moving notice how the arm is off to the side? As this is a movable stud you can just move it with the balance in the watch until the arm is over the pivot of the pallet fork and you'll be in beat or at least much closer than you are now. Seeing as how the timing machines not going to help you with that until we get the image to clean up

Then Julia picture the dial side because I want to see what the balance jewel looks like? Plus maybe a picture straight down at the balance wheel and not sure with a see anything but just because may be perhaps?

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Dear John 

Thanks for taking time to put thoughts on balance analysis. I noticed that there was a single piece of wool hiding right under the bridge in the smallest diameter of the hairspring. With this removed, I cleaned it again and soaked it in benzine for an hour. That made a remarkable difference in the amplitude and gradually went better by time. Then adjusted the stud to correct the best error and here are the results for now. 

Screenshot_20220323-064529.png

Screenshot_20220323-064558.png

Screenshot_20220323-064601.png

Screenshot_20220323-064606.png

Posted
3 hours ago, Khan said:

I noticed that there was a single piece of wool hiding right under the bridge in the smallest diameter of the hairspring. With this removed, I cleaned it again and soaked it in benzine for an hour.

It's amazing all the little things that can screw up the balance wheel and that will affect everything related to timing. Versus other things that people tend to get excited about like in your case the mainspring

Then out of curiosity how did you lubricate the escapement? Also did you demagnetized the watch?

Then your images are almost impossible to see The 1000 machine has the ability to changes LCD contrast. I snipped out an image from the manual. Is slightly cryptic in the that you can't just push and hold the arrow button you have to push in a whole bunch of times. Because currently it looks like you're near one of the extremes which is why it's so hard to see. You should build adjusted to get a much nicer image which also photographs really nicely

 

 

t 1000 lcd con.JPG

Posted

Thanks for the tip, I will look up on the LCD once home. 

You are absolutely right in the fact that the smallest odd things can effect such a sensitive part as a balance wheel. 
I de-magnetized the watch and checked it for magnetization on a compass. 
I lubricated the left stone of the pallet fork with a slight drop of Moebius 9415. 

 

Posted

You want the 0.12 thickness mainspring. It will produce around 30% greater force than the 0.11 thickness mainspring.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • One of the problems with trying to Photograph Phils things are that his enjoyment was building these things so they tended to E falls on what will see if I can find some earlier pictures or any pictures I wasn't even sure because I was looking for that specific picture for somebody else and even it got the last version and that would have been the last version. You will note that he put the indexing on something that he could unscrew it or whatever and it can slide back out of the way so the rest of the lathe can be used as a lathe. With the lathe cut are actually coming down from the top I was there once where he demonstrated how to cut a pivot with the setup it was really beautiful. Older set up if I remember it's not a worm gear assembly in the thing in between the stepping motor and the holding block I believe this particular one was like a 100 to 1 gear ratio. Earlier version with watchmaker's lathe. Even looks like he is the watchmakers bed and then switch to something he made. Then I do have other pictures and things of the rotary stage in use. In the raw so if you tube videos here is an example of one were somebody's mounting a three jaw chuck. At one time there were available on eBay they were not cheap but if you're patient like I was I found one cheap on eBay. After you watch the video it look at his other videos he is a whole bunch of other examples of the same rotary stage. That I do know there are other pictures examples and possibly videos you just have to track them down. One of the minor issues of finding this particular tech sheet for the unit is I believe it was a custom manufacturer and the company change their name but I remember the new name here's a link to the company https://www.ondrivesus.com/rino-mechanical-components                
    • Escapement adjusting always interesting and depending upon the reference always confusing. Okay maybe it's not always confusing but it does lead to confusion. I have a PDF below it's actually a whole bunch of separate stuff including a hand out that came from a lecture that's on you tube. Then from that we get this image Consequences of doing things especially if you do things out of order or you do things for the wrong reason. Oh and even if the watches working I made the mistake one so showing my boss how tweaking the banking pins on a full plate on the timing machine made the amplitude get better and now he thinks that's what they're for and I don't think a fully grasped exactly what horn clearance means. Consequence of doing things. Notice what it says about opening and closing the banking pins and total lock? So yes I've had that on a full plate where it won't unlock at all and that's the banking pins or a combination of things basically. So banking pins unfortunately get moved. One of the ways to tell if it's been moved is the look straight down at the end of the fork with the balance wheel removed. Power on the fork push at the one side look at it push it to the other side also look at it and compare anything with the center reference the balance jewel and see if both sides of the same. No guarantee after the same there in the right place but at least are the same typically when people play with things one side will be way off from the other because they had no idea what they were doing at all because of course it's a full plate and you really have to paying attention and even then there's still hard to do. Then the other thing that comes up like it shows below is people often adjust the banking pins to do all those other things as opposed to horn clearance which is all that it's therefore and maybe bonus Guard pin clearance although you're supposed to deal with the guard pin is a separate thing like single roller gets bent in Or out or sometimes physically gets moved in and out. Some full plates older escapement's typically pallet forks held together with screws and you can actually unscrew and move the entire assembly in Or out more complications to deal with.     Escapement handout wostep nscc.pdf
    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
    • I have acquired a Citizen Leopard 36000 watch. My reason for purchasing it was my desire to own a timepiece with a 36,000 BPH movement, and the price was reasonable. Another motivating factor was gaining hands-on experience with the mechanism. The watch is in good condition, but I intend to fully disassemble it for maintenance. First and foremost, if anyone has prior experience with this particular model, I would greatly appreciate their insights. I do not have access to Citizen’s specialized lubricants and will need to use the ones available to me, such as 9010, 8000, and 8300 grease. Additionally, I do not possess the appropriate oil for the pallet jewels and will only be able to clean them.
×
×
  • Create New...