Jump to content

6/0 42 Movement Alternatives? (WW2 Waltham)


Recommended Posts


I've got a WW2 era (1941) Waltham wristwatch with the Premier 9 jewel 6/0 42 movement. The balance wheel has a pretty good amount of lateral play and my local repair person wants at least $350 to fix and service it.  I respect his profession and estimate but that's more than I'd like to have into this to get it running.  My thought is I'd try to find out if there's a modern hack movement that exists to swap out and just transfer the dial and hands.

Does such a thing exist? What other budget friendly options do I have?

Other Questions:  This is my first vintage, military, non-working watch.  The movement serial dates to 1941, but what can be said about the unique hands of this watch (mercedes hands?), and does this watch appear to be original in terms of all the components?


 

45732579-B9B6-4F01-9CEC-D75391840901_1_201_a.jpeg

FA43AFA0-09A4-44B4-B996-E9328E519B01.jpeg

72548F48-144D-4EDE-A4F0-FD46C3E0E56D.jpeg

B8ABFCFD-B735-49EC-B4B0-1D55C8370854.jpeg

01BA451D-1ECA-4801-98B4-37C1E4D96AE1.jpeg

Edited by Winecaster
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To understand part of the problem we need to go to the link below and look at the size chart. It's only part of the problem because of the thickness of the movement. So a modern replacement watch would have to be the same size or it could be smaller but the thickness will be wrong.

Because it's a military movement they made a lot of them you could keep an eye on eBay and see if he can find another movement. But the military movements tended to have a hard life and finding  one in good running condition is a bit problematic.

Then from your description of the balance wheel it's probably a broken balance staff and of course a complete overhaul. It's very common for these watches the end up with broken staffs because the balance system is not shock protected like modern watches.

https://blog.esslinger.com/watch-size-ligne-conversion-chart/

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That sounds like a fair estimate to be honest, if the balance needs repairing. Did he already take a close look at the watch and describe the work he thinks is necessary? You could get a quote for the same work from somewhere else for comparison. Alternatively, try to find a running example of the same movement. If you swap it for something non-original, you will destroy its value. Your final option, as you are here on this forum, is to do it yourself, but you are looking at much more than 350$ for the tools alone, then you need education and a lot of practice on top of that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check the end stones, they generally are domed on the outer side and concave on the inner. The idea is to benefit from the said diference.

End stone on the dial side is set in a retainer plate, remove and flip it over, so to have the domed side of end stone facing balance pivot, you have reduced the end shake.

Though this trick might be frowned upon, it works and extends the life of the staff for a good ten years of running.

Hopefully in future you will have acquired the skill and a staking set to replace the balance staff.

Mark Lovic teaches you how to replace a staff and we are your classmates here. 

Regs

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies everyone!  My first thought after reading responses is to keep an eye out for a loaded balance wheel and see if anything else needs attention during the swap.  What I need to know with that approach is if all Waltham 6/0 balance assemblies work for the ‘42 or if I specifically need to hunt down a ‘42.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Does it say 17 jewels on the dial or on the movement ?
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds. 
    • Lots of rust on that hairspring Nev, would you even try to clean it up ?
    • How do you find the working distance from microscope lens to movement? Is it comfortable enough to get tools in?
    • Once you have the collet closer bits off, and the pulley off, there are two nuts on the spindle. These must be removed. There is a large nut in the back of the headstock with two holes, remove this with an appropriate wrench. The front large nut comes off too. The spindle now comes out- but wait- there's more! There is a spacer between the outer races of the bearings; the spindle will almost certainly come out "assembled" with both bearings and this spacer (it can actually come out front or back-ways with the large nuts off the headstock). You have to manage to press out the spindle from the rear bearing, get the spacer off, then remove the front bearing, now you can get to the key.   Imagining you get it all apart without causing any damage to the bearings, now the fun part starts. You must apply preload to the bearings, and this is a very tricky endeavor. Basically once you have the bearings back on, and are in the casting, you snug up the rear nut (one of the two) on the spindle, checking the play of the spindle with at least a 0.002mm reading indicator, until there is zero axial play, then just a little more, then snug up the second nut to lock things in place. Of course snugging up the second nut influences the preload, so you can go back and forth a few times to get it right. Too much preload and bearing life diminishes, too little, and you get poor performance, poor surface finishes, ball skidding, etc.   When I replaced the bearings in one of mine many years ago, I was surprised to find that the bearings were regular deep-groove bearings, but of a higher precision class than normal. I replaced with dimensionally identical angular contact bearings, class P4. In trying to set the preload, I just about lost my mind, so called Barden (the high precision arm of FAG bearing makers, and who made my new ones) and a nice engineer told me that the folks at Leinen were either crazy, or really good- he also said it's 100% A-OK to set up deep groove bearings with preload like this, but best is angular contact. In this bearing setup, the standard way to do it is to have a spacer between the outer races, and another between the inner races. Leinen has the former but not the latter, haha. His advice was to make an inner spacer. The trick is it has to be the exact same length as the outer spacer, within like a micron.  Then you just tighten everything up and the preload is set, because the bearings (the new ones) are ground in a way that they have proper preload in that situation. Easy. Sort of- if you have the means to make the other spacer!   Just to note- Schaublin does the preloading as Leinen did on these on their lathes using angular contact bearings. There is a procedure in the manual, where you tighten the nut until axial play is zero, then a certain number of degrees more. This works on their setup as the nut itself locks without a second nut, and they spent the time to figure it all out in a repeatable way.   I say all this not to scare you off from dismantling your headstock, just to give a heads-up what you're up against to get it back to where it was before.
×
×
  • Create New...