Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi everyone, I hope you are all well!  Been working on a Venus 175 for the last while that needed a few things.  Last on the list was the minute recorder spring, which I have found replacement options for but they are all quite pricy.  So I decided to have a go at making my own.  I have never attempted anything quite like this so this was a very new experience for me.  I did still have the damaged spring which was snapped in half, so I was able to use it as a pattern for the new spring.  I glued the 2 halves to the stock for the new spring.  After much filing and figuring this is what I came up with.  Test fitting and function was good so all that was needed was to tightening it down for the last time.  This is where the low comes in with the final picture.... how quickly things can change with one slip in this hobby of ours!

SPRING.jpg

SPRING2.jpg

SPRING3.jpg

SPRING4.jpg

Posted
  On 12/10/2021 at 7:17 PM, Stevelp said:

This is where the low comes in with the final picture.... how quickly things can change with one slip in this hobby of ours!

Expand  

Good work but looking at the 2nd last picture the section was made so th8n that In my opinion is not surprising it has snapped. Also, in some cases it's beneficial to harden the spring for extra strength.

Posted

Thank you.  yes it is quite thin.  The original spring measured 0.01mm and I went to 0.04mm as I was concerned to go any further so it is thicker than the original.  I used a feeler gauge for the stock which I thought were hardened, but if not, thanks for the info I will try that the second time around.

Posted
  On 12/10/2021 at 7:41 PM, Stevelp said:

The original spring measured 0.01mm and I went to 0.04mm as I was concerned to go any further so it is thicker than the original.

Expand  

Are you sure about that? It's impossible for a setting spring to be only one cent of a millimeter thick. Try flexing a 0.05mm feeler blade to get an idea of how thin and fragile steel is at that thickness. There are 0.05mm mainsprings, but are made of hardened special alloys. I world try again making the spring as thick as possible while it fits and work mechanically.

Posted

Thanks Plato for the encouragement!  Yup I’ll give it another go.  I guess thats a positive out of these situations, you learn what to do better with the next one😋

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 12/11/2021 at 4:04 AM, Stevelp said:

817841E8-ED74-440F-9B17-DC76B38674A1.thumb.jpeg.f43c0c7a5ac3cfe92019df7ae4d280df.jpeg

Expand  

Impressive work! Just wanted to mention that I have the exact same type of caliper and it is surprisingly exact. I'd say it is usually only off by 1/100 of a millimetre (or so). Anyway, for any precision measuring I use my Bergeon micrometre  (very proud and happy to own it) as seen in this post measuring my AliExpress jeweling tool anvils and pump pushers.

Posted

Have another go! I'm sure your second attempt will be even better. try to keep the thin section at a consistent thickness. If you used a file so far, maybe try with a stone?

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks VWatchie!  Wow that is a great looking micrometer no doubt!  I think I may have to invest in a bench micrometer as well in the future for projects such as this.  Yes I had a little trouble keeping the thickness consistent throughout the thinnest portion of the spring.  I held the piece upside down in a hand vise while filing because upside down was the only way to grasp the piece enough while filing.  Before I knew it the piece was so thing that I couldnt file the middle anymore without the possibility of snapping it.  So I will work the top more next time before moving to the bottom.  Would you have a recommendation as to what kind of stone I should consider?

 

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 12/11/2021 at 5:56 PM, Stevelp said:

Would you have a recommendation as to what kind of stone I should consider?

Expand  

I have never made any watch parts, so I'm afraid I have no advice to give. I think/hope @Klassiker will have some tip for you!?

The only stones I use these days for my tweezers, screw drivers, etc. are diamond stones. Amazing piece of equipment as they only need water and are super efficient.

Posted

Sorry, before I misunderstood what this part is for. I still think that the thin section is not 0,01mm but some amount more than that.  But what's important is not measuring precisely, but making it. The original may not have been just cut off or machined, it may have been pressed between dies in the thin section. And almost certainly it is not made of the same material the OP has at hand, and is heath treated. Reproducing all that in the right sequence at home could be difficult, so perhaps one should think out of the box. When something can't be made as one piece, it could be made in more. For example one could try glueing a strip of 0.04 feeler gauge to the two "bigger" sections.

  • Like 1
Posted

My thought was, that filing a thin section would be difficult, as even the finest teeth have a tendency to snag. Also, files don't leave the best surface finish behind, and scratches are stress-raisers. So that's why I suggested a stone. I have a selection of the midget Degussit profiles, and I would try with one of those. 

The video posted by Plato above is a must-watch (12 to 17 minutes in). Mark makes the spring uses diamond files which I don't have but are probably even better for this job than stones (less fragile) so if you are buying new, maybe get a set of those. The method he demonstrates, of glueing down the part onto a larger plate to support it during the final stages, is invaluable.

Posted

Thanks Plato for the link, I’ll give that a watch!  Klassiker, I hadn’t thought of the surface finish problem, that makes total sense.  I was aware of it for mainsprings but it didn’t cross my mind for this application.  I’ll look into those files for sure, as I’m sure they have many applications.  I had glued my piece to thicker on as well but as things were filed thinner and thinner I found it extremely difficult to remove the residual glue without potentially damaging the piece.  I soaked it in 99% IPA and tried acetone as well but it was still very difficult to remove.  I’m curious to watch and see what Mark uses.  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Escapement adjusting always interesting and depending upon the reference always confusing. Okay maybe it's not always confusing but it does lead to confusion. I have a PDF below it's actually a whole bunch of separate stuff including a hand out that came from a lecture that's on you tube. Then from that we get this image Consequences of doing things especially if you do things out of order or you do things for the wrong reason. Oh and even if the watches working I made the mistake one so showing my boss how tweaking the banking pins on a full plate on the timing machine made the amplitude get better and now he thinks that's what they're for and I don't think a fully grasped exactly what horn clearance means. Consequence of doing things. Notice what it says about opening and closing the banking pins and total lock? So yes I've had that on a full plate where it won't unlock at all and that's the banking pins or a combination of things basically. So banking pins unfortunately get moved. One of the ways to tell if it's been moved is the look straight down at the end of the fork with the balance wheel removed. Power on the fork push at the one side look at it push it to the other side also look at it and compare anything with the center reference the balance jewel and see if both sides of the same. No guarantee after the same there in the right place but at least are the same typically when people play with things one side will be way off from the other because they had no idea what they were doing at all because of course it's a full plate and you really have to paying attention and even then there's still hard to do. Then the other thing that comes up like it shows below is people often adjust the banking pins to do all those other things as opposed to horn clearance which is all that it's therefore and maybe bonus Guard pin clearance although you're supposed to deal with the guard pin is a separate thing like single roller gets bent in Or out or sometimes physically gets moved in and out. Some full plates older escapement's typically pallet forks held together with screws and you can actually unscrew and move the entire assembly in Or out more complications to deal with.     Escapement handout wostep nscc.pdf
    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
    • I have acquired a Citizen Leopard 36000 watch. My reason for purchasing it was my desire to own a timepiece with a 36,000 BPH movement, and the price was reasonable. Another motivating factor was gaining hands-on experience with the mechanism. The watch is in good condition, but I intend to fully disassemble it for maintenance. First and foremost, if anyone has prior experience with this particular model, I would greatly appreciate their insights. I do not have access to Citizen’s specialized lubricants and will need to use the ones available to me, such as 9010, 8000, and 8300 grease. Additionally, I do not possess the appropriate oil for the pallet jewels and will only be able to clean them.
    • Hello all, I am working on an older Valjoux Chrono. It doesn't have a stamp on the movement anywhere but I believe it is a Valjoux 72. I installed the train of wheels and they will not turn. The problem appears to be the 4th wheel and the escape wheel are not interfacing correctly. I had to replace both of these parts as the pivots were broken on each. I sourced genuine Valjoux/ETA replacements. I think the problem is with the escape wheel as all the wheels turn perfectly if I remove just the escape wheel.  My question to those with more Valjoux experience is am I mistaken? Is this some other model altogether and I have the wrong part or parts?    
×
×
  • Create New...