Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Well it is very nice...jealous.  I may have to build one but I would rather not!

It's mostly plastic, clamps and springs on a metal base... I'll take some more photos and measurements tomorrow if you want?

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, markr said:

I bought a Accutron 600 tester.  Now I need to learn how to use it.

I think the most important tool will be a microscope although having the proper factory tools are definitely a bonus... provided they work!! 

Edited by Plato
Missed a word out
Posted
15 minutes ago, Plato said:

It's mostly plastic, clamps and springs on a metal base... I'll take some more photos and measurements tomorrow if you want?

Sure. I can 3D print all of the plastic pieces.  I bought some pogo pins awhile back thinking I would build the probes. 

Every time I test a quartz movement (out of the case), it is a fiddly process...need to do better.

Posted
9 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Sure. I can 3D print all of the plastic pieces.  I bought some pogo pins awhile back thinking I would build the probes. 

Every time I test a quartz movement (out of the case), it is a fiddly process...need to do better.

I'll take some decent photos of it tomorrow, it's not perfect but quite versatile... the clamp is the same as the one on the Vibrograf M80. 

Posted

The 218 I have is running inside the holder but when removed from the holder is stops running.  I put movement into a genetic metal movement holder and it ran.  Removed from holder and stopped.  What's going on?

Posted

I tried.  That's not it.  I pick it up by the crown and it stops put it back in the movement holder and it starts again.

Posted
23 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

You might have accidentally touched the fork and stopped it. Try tapping the movement lightly at the 3 o'clock or 9 o'clock position to start it again.

@HectorLooi I believe that the tuning fork movements cannot start as well with modern silver oxide batteries. I think it's something to do with the higher internal resistance compared to the old mercury batteries. I have two tuning fork watches and they do need an extra 'knock' to start running... please correct me if I'm wrong. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, markr said:

I tried.  That's not it.  I pick it up by the crown and it stops put it back in the movement holder and it starts again.

Can you post a picture of your set-up. It might be the crown activated on-off switch. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Plato said:

I believe that the tuning fork movements cannot start as well with modern silver oxide batteries. I think it's something to do with the higher internal resistance compared to the old mercury batteries.

I somehow doubt that that's the problem as I've never heard of that before. We really need a picture.

8 minutes ago, markr said:

And I'm making sure the stem is staying in.

Any time you were removing the stem from the watch in which position was the watch in? In other words typically when you remove a stem from a watch it's in the winding position so was it in the winding position or the setting position when you inserted or remove the stem?

Posted
9 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

somehow doubt that that's the problem as I've never heard of that before. We really need a picture

I'm pretty sure I can prove it. I have an old stock of mercury batteries. I can post you one for experimentation. They (ESA9162) start better with mercury batteries. Once up and running, it makes no difference. 

Posted

In the past year, I've serviced more than 10 tuning fork watches, mostly Accutrons 214s, a couple of 218s, a 219 and a 228. I still have an ESA 9162 on my workbench.

I noticed that most if them start up just fine but some need gentle coaxing to get them started. The ESA 9162 is one of them. I'm not sure if it's inherent to the circuit design or if the components have deteriorated as all of them are over 50 years old.

Posted
7 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

The ESA 9162 is one of them. I'm not sure if it's inherent to the circuit design or if the components have deteriorated as all of them are over 50 years old.

The only sensitive component that suffers wear is the index wheel. I'm convinced that a modern battery affects the performance of the original design. Please check the internal resistance of a silver oxide battery compared to a mercury equivalent, it is inferior. @jdm will know this stuff, hopefully? 

Posted

I'm refering to electronic components like the transistor, resistor and capacitor. I'm sure solder joints age too. Most electronic components nowadays are only designed to last about 10 years. Those in tuning fork watches are half a century old.

  • Like 1
Posted

It's not a starting up issue because just sitting on the movement holder with the battery in it it runs. Pick it up it stops.  Place it back on the movement holder and it starts again.

Posted

Is the metal movement holder closing a break in a circuit that you may not be aware of?

Does it restart if you put it down on something that is insulated? Plastic movement holder? Working mat?

I really don't now what I am talking about. Just looking at it from a layman's point of view.

Posted
6 hours ago, Plato said:

I'm pretty sure I can prove it. I have an old stock of mercury batteries. I can post you one for experimentation. They (ESA9162) start better with mercury batteries. Once up and running, it makes no difference. 

I'm looking forward to your test results as I still don't think it's the problem, but I'm not an electrical engineer either so I will look forward to the test results.

Posted

That's really strange. Your movement holder appears to be plastic, so the theory of a metal holder shirting and completing the curcuit doesn't hold.

The 219 also doesn't have a hacking switch, so that eliminates another possibility.

Can you remove the battery and power it from your tester while the movement is not in the holder?

Posted
5 hours ago, markr said:

It's not a starting up issue because just sitting on the movement holder with the battery in it it runs. Pick it up it stops.  Place it back on the movement holder and it starts again.

I need a better picture of something? Then I think I asked a question which didn't get answered let me see and I will quote it?

8 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Any time you were removing the stem from the watch in which position was the watch in? In other words typically when you remove a stem from a watch it's in the winding position so was it in the winding position or the setting position when you inserted or remove the stem?

Now the reason I asked the question I did is in the 218 manual it says when removing the stem you should always do the following which is what? Notice when ever removing the stem from a 218 it must be in the setting position? The reason for this is if you don't do this you have the possibility of getting it in an interesting position of both running and setting at the same time. This means if it's in the running position and you turn the crown the gear train will spin it's very bad for the index wheel so I wouldn't try. I can't tell in the photograph but it looks to me like the  little brass pin that is used to move the finger away looks like it's touching but it's really hard to tell in the photographs and it's not supposed to be touching when the watches running it should be a way just a little bit. But it may be a picture optical illusion.

Then I should delete everything up above because I feel really stupid? But since I tend to feel stupid a lot I'm going to leave what I posted up above because it's still a good thing to remember. So why do I feel stupid because I wasn't paying attention to your pictures At least paying attention to the way we should have. I snipped out a couple more images and circled a mystery component I don't suppose you're missing any screws?

 

 

picture needed better 218.JPG

stem removal 218.JPG

218 mystery component looks familiar.JPG

218 mystery component I wonder what that is.JPG

  • Like 1
Posted

Wow, good eye JohnR725! We all looked but didn't see. It's very common for dropped screws to stick to the fork magnets.

But that doesn't explain why it works in the holder and not outside.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • it would be nice to have the exact model of the watch the or a picture so we can see exactly what you're talking about. this is because the definition of Swiss watch could be a variety of things and it be helpful if we could see exactly the watch your dealing with then in professional watch repair at least some professionals they do pre-cleaned watches. In other words the hands and dial come off and the entire movement assembled goes through a cleaning machine sometimes I think a shorter bath perhaps so everything is nice and clean for disassembly makes it easier to look for problems. Then other professionals don't like pre-cleaning because it basically obliterates the scene of the crime. Especially when dealing with vintage watches where you're looking for metal filings and problems that may visually go away with cleaning. Then usually super sticky lubrication isn't really a problem for disassembly and typically shouldn't be a problem on a pallet fork bridge because there shouldn't be any lubrication on the bridge at all as you typically do not oil the pallet fork pivots.  
    • A few things you should find out before you can mske a decision of what to do. As Richard said, what is the crown and all of the crown components made of . Then also the stem .  The crown looks to have a steel washer that retains a gasket. So be careful with what chemicals you use to dissolve any stem adhesives or the use of heat. You might swell or melt the gasket unless you are prepared to change that also . The steel washer maybe reactive to alum. Something I've just used to dissolve a broken screw from a plate. First drilled out the centre of the screw with a 0.5mm carbide . Dipped only the section that held the broken screw in Rustins rust remover. This is 40 % phosphoric acid. 3 days and the screw remains were completely dissolved, no trace of steel in the brass threads. A black puddle left in the solution.
    • I suppose this will add to the confusion I have a roller jewel assortment. It lists out American pocket watches for Elgin 18 size and even 16 size it's a 50. But not all the various companies used 50-50 does seem to be common one company had a 51 and the smallest is 43. American parts are always interesting? Francis Elgin for mainsprings will tell you the thickness of the spring other companies will not even though the spring for the same number could come in a variety of thicknesses. But if we actually had the model number of your watch we would find it probably makes a reference that the roller jewel came in different dimensions. So overlook the parts book we find that? So it appears to be 18 and 16 size would be the same sort of the arson different catalog numbers and as I said we don't have your Mongol know which Log number were supposed to be using. Variety of materials garnered her sapphire single or double but zero mention about diameters. Then in a section of rollers in this case rollers with jewels we do get this down in the notes section Roller specifications but of course zero reference to the jewel size. I was really hoping the roller jewel assortment would give us sizes it doesn't really. But it does show a picture of how one particular roller jewel gauge is used  
    • Seems to still do it through my mobile data, I use an android phone almost exclusively, but I'll double check it. Thanks mark Strange, I'll try my laptop that utilities edge. I've been on site half hour since I got home, it hasn't done it yet. Thanks John
    • At work, I'm on MS Edge, not through chose, on my phone, chrome, no issues with either. 
×
×
  • Create New...