Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

As being fairly new to Horology this movement seems a bit different regarding disassembly. I was able to take the movement completely down but I did so more in the case instead of a movement holder due to the automatic wind complication. I have also noted a couple of tension spring that I am unsure if they should be removed during the cleaning process or should they be left in? The other issue I'm having is removing the mainspring from the barrel. The ratchet wheel seems to be permanently attached to the arbor, so some light attempts to separate the lid by applying pressure to the arbor, there appears to be quite a bit of resistance so I did not want to apply to much pressure on the arbor to get the lid to pop open. How should I attack this situation? Are there any disassembly / assembly video's data available? I also found a loose screw within the movement which I currently do see the need for at this point, I have to wait to see if a screw was missing during the reassembly process. 

Thanks, 

Ed... 

Posted

Its a Felsa, Dr ranfft shows 560ss, no mention of 550 RSS.

Rotor should be removed to check & clean the jewel.

There should be a ratchet screw which you remove to pop the ratchet wheel off, have you removed the winder module ( auto device)? 

Will you show a pic of the ratchet wheel and what your talking about.

Regs

Posted
6 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

Its a Felsa, Dr ranfft shows 560ss, no mention of 550 RSS.

Rotor should be removed to check & clean the jewel.

There should be a ratchet screw which you remove to pop the ratchet wheel off, have you removed the winder module ( auto device)? 

Will you show a pic of the ratchet wheel and what your talking about.

Regs

Ratchet wheel not typical. Here are some photos of the barrel with the ratchet wheel attached. 

20211128_101315.jpg

20211128_101210.jpg

20211128_101126.jpg

Posted

Here's a photo of the movement before disassembly. Rotor does not resemble the 560 SS. I have service another movement that was similar to the 560 SS with the movable detente. The movement I am currently working on had to have the blued retaining screws removed to remove the rotor. 

20211126_211911.jpg

Posted

Further attempts to get this apart and noticed it appears that the ratchet wheel screws onto the arbor. I attempted to rotate it in a clockwise direction (ratchet wheel) and it appears to wind the mainspring. Rotating it in the counter clockwise direction brings it to a positive stop. Completely perplexed!

Posted

Hi all! 

Persistence saved the day. So after thinking about the barrel and not finding any additional information on the internet I attempted to remove the barrel lid once again after soaking the assembly in Naptha and blowing out the excess with a bulb blower. I applied slight more downward pressure on the barrel assembly and Pop it opened! Elated I took some photos to give everyone a look inside this barrel. The stem protruding through the center has a small square nut holding it into the barrel itself, that was what I was seeing under the microscope. Hopefully this additional information and photos will help someone down the line. 

Thanks to all who replied. 

PS found out where the extra screw came from the winding counter weight was missing the center screw and the other two were loose. Problem solved!

 

20211128_205207.jpg

20211128_204642.jpg

  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 hours ago, mikepilk said:

Here http://thewatchspotblog.com/?p=4176 it refers to the base calibre of the 560 RSS as a Bidlingmaier ebauche, with an added automatic winding mechanism. Not a company I've heard of.

This represents one of the problems for new people and watch repair who made their watch? We can have a name on the dial another name on the movement like this made by Gruen and who actually made the movement? A lot of times the movement maker would put their initials under the balance wheel or under the dial? Then if we don't find it there if we had the line size of the movement and a decent picture the setting parts found in to the dial we could use the fingerprint system and figure out who actually made the movement which might even lead us to a tech sheet.

As you gave us a name it narrows it down but I don't have a size and setting parts would be nice but there's a list. So unfortunately it tells us they made a lot of automatic watches so we need more information.

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?begin=BID_&end=BID_&label=Calibres_Manufactured_by_BIDLINGMEIER

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&Bifora_000

Now the problem with information is what if someone got it wrong? If you take the first leg to go through the movements are all automatic I'm not seeing anything that matches although maybe I didn't click on every single watch. So maybe somebody guessed wrong as to who made this

so more searching reveals a movement on eBay where it doesn't look like any markings of the balance wheel and conveniently they show the back dial side plus the give us a size so to  11.5 for the size basically are standard watch size and who require more research. as I'm just not quite sold on who made this.

 

Posted

Other ways to find watches that we can not identify is the bestfit book as I mentioned above the fingerprint system we look at the setting parts we know the diameter size of movement we might be lucky and find it. Or there's another section in the book that has pictures of automatic movements we just start at the beginning and go through and see if we find anything that looks similar or maybe the exactly the same we might be lucky which might be unfortunate?

Question now is why did I say unfortunate?

Does appear the watch was made by Gruen the bestfit company lists the automatic parts. Now this is a good and bad news thing it depends upon where you are in the world and the access to material houses? Problem is I don't know how foreign the world the best fit system went whether it's a worldwide part availability or just the US. So for instance if I needed a part I would call my local material house and asked her. Because it's a relatively new material house she would never have the part but she would order it from wherever bestfit parts come from. Then a couple weeks we find out if it exists she might find out sooner but I've had good luck doing this. The problem with bestfit another systems are the material houses online do not list everything they have so that means you have to send them an email reach out and give them all the parts description and hopefully will be nice and try to look it up for you. Because often times it's easier to find the best fit parts which is really a part made by that company but under their numbering system then to find an original Gruen part which you could also try to do.

The problem now becomes I'm looking at two of the sources that I typically look at for tech sheets and Gruen is  not showing up at all. This is one of the interesting problems and watch repair is everyone assumes that there are tech sheets parts lists and stuff out there and conceivably there are not which casually appears to be in the case of this watch

 

Gruen 560.JPG

Gruen parts identification problem.JPG

Posted
On 12/3/2021 at 12:11 PM, TimpanogosSlim said:

Coincidentally, one of these arrived on my desk today. I haven't started disassembly, but the stem doesn't want to move or come out. Sounds like it's going to be interesting. 

The one I worked on was a bugger to get out as well. 

  • 3 months later...
Posted
On 11/28/2021 at 5:00 PM, mikepilk said:

Here http://thewatchspotblog.com/?p=4176 it refers to the base calibre of the 560 RSS as a Bidlingmaier ebauche, with an added automatic winding mechanism. Not a company I've heard of.

I've tried to find additional information on this movement with no luck. I put the movement aside for awhile and recently getting back to it. Unfortunately while performing a complete takedown once again to refreshen the lubricant I small washer had appeared and can't seem to find where it belongs. I've checked the photos I had taken previously with no luck. The only place that makes any sense is atop of the gear assembly atop of the main barrel, as a spacer or a shim.  

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
    • I have acquired a Citizen Leopard 36000 watch. My reason for purchasing it was my desire to own a timepiece with a 36,000 BPH movement, and the price was reasonable. Another motivating factor was gaining hands-on experience with the mechanism. The watch is in good condition, but I intend to fully disassemble it for maintenance. First and foremost, if anyone has prior experience with this particular model, I would greatly appreciate their insights. I do not have access to Citizen’s specialized lubricants and will need to use the ones available to me, such as 9010, 8000, and 8300 grease. Additionally, I do not possess the appropriate oil for the pallet jewels and will only be able to clean them.
    • Hello all, I am working on an older Valjoux Chrono. It doesn't have a stamp on the movement anywhere but I believe it is a Valjoux 72. I installed the train of wheels and they will not turn. The problem appears to be the 4th wheel and the escape wheel are not interfacing correctly. I had to replace both of these parts as the pivots were broken on each. I sourced genuine Valjoux/ETA replacements. I think the problem is with the escape wheel as all the wheels turn perfectly if I remove just the escape wheel.  My question to those with more Valjoux experience is am I mistaken? Is this some other model altogether and I have the wrong part or parts?    
    • I would remove the wheels, check for damage and if not damaged, clean. 
    • Thanks for the replies! Here's a photo of the front of the clock and a GIF animation of the movement (exposed by removing the black cap in the centre of the clock). You can see the behaviour of the gears. It's a fairly valuable clock from the 80s (Braun ABW 35). I'm not sure if replacing the movement would diminish the value, so I'd prefer to keep the original parts if it's easy to fix. But since the movement itself is pretty generic, I guess, maybe replacing it wouldn't make any difference with regard to the value of the clock? Or would it? I suppose the value is mostly in the design.
×
×
  • Create New...