Jump to content

Cheap watch repair kit--review


Recommended Posts

I bought this kit to take with me when I am "junking" with my wife, so I can open a watch that I might find to see if it is worth purchasing, or perhaps to install a battery or some other small task.  Of course, I have a copious amount of quality tools, but do not want then to take them out of the LittleWatchShop!  So, since this kit is under $20 with tax and everything on Amazon, I bought it.  Here is my initial review.  A correction for the video: I paid $29 for the LG back wrench.

Firstly, the back wrench is an actual asset to my tool drawer.  The reason is because of its greater span than my regular wrench.  I felt this was important enough to make a short video to describe this.

The rest of the tool kit is a "mixed bag."

The screwdrivers are very similar to the classic Bergeon driver.  I illustrate a visual comparison as well as show the driver set that my Dad gave me for Christmas about 50 years ago.  The blades from the cheap kit are horrible "out of the box" so they must be dressed before use. 

The tweezer is very basic and just borders on usability.  I don't know the correct term for the "squeezability" of a tweezer, but compared to my Dumonts, the squeezability is pretty bad.  I had no expectation here, so am not really disappointed.  I will pack a Dumont tweezer (I have many) with the kit for better performance when necessary.

The bracelet pin remover stuff is OK at best.  I have one I had purchased separately and the quality of the metal is poor--bends easily.  The springbar remover tool is horrible--I show pictures of the end.  Not sure it will even work.  In TheLittleWatch shop, I use a "non-precision" screwdriver for removing spring bars.

The watch case holder is actually pretty nice.  I will find use for that...even here on the bench.

The bracelet holder is a nice idea.  I do not have one and I think it is useful enough to get one for the bench.

There are two "snap-back" removers.  Not sure why...perhaps to accommodate prying angle.  At this point, I have no opinion about them...until I try them out.

The kit comes with a little hammer that is kinda cute.  It is used for pounding in bracelet pins.  Has a metal and plastic head.

At then end of the day...it is worth the $20 I spent if only for the back wrench, movement holder, and bracelet holder.  The drivers are usable and the folding case is a compact way to carry a small number of tools.  As I actually use this kit, I plan to report back.

IMG_7508.JPG

2021-10-28 07_25_34-Window.png

IMG_7510.JPG

2021-10-28 07_27_13-Window.png

2021-10-28 07_27_36-Window.png

2021-10-28 07_27_55-Window.png

2021-10-28 07_28_10-Window.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Firstly, the back wrench is an actual asset to my tool drawer.

My experience. Cheap wrenches do mostly work, but loose pins (years ago I used silicon grease to keep them in place), and the wobbly handle screw are unpleasant to use.

 

1 hour ago, LittleWatchShop said:

The screwdrivers are very similar to the classic Bergeon driver.

Minus the roller bearing probably, I don't know if "classic Bergeon" have that.

 

1 hour ago, LittleWatchShop said:

The blades from the cheap kit are horrible "out of the box" so they must be dressed before use. 

I'd rather buy 3 sizes of the "unbranded A*F" drivers.  Even my set of Chinese drivers is better than that.

 

1 hour ago, LittleWatchShop said:

The bracelet pin remover stuff is OK at best.  I have one I had purchased separately and the quality of the metal is poor--bends easily. 

I bought various cheap ones for gifting, and kept the less horrible. It still plastic, but has few spare tips inside and it works.

 

1 hour ago, LittleWatchShop said:

The springbar remover tool is horrible--I show pictures of the end.

You can buy Bergeon original (wow) screw-on tips for it. 

 

1 hour ago, LittleWatchShop said:

The watch case holder is actually pretty nice.

Yes it's of the sturdy breed. There is another type like that, uglier but even sturdier.

 

1 hour ago, LittleWatchShop said:

There are two "snap-back" removers.  Not sure why...perhaps to accommodate prying angle.

These are copies of Seiko which makes four types. What for each type is meant exactly is a Japan's trade secret.

 

1 hour ago, LittleWatchShop said:

 the folding case is a compact way to carry a small number of tools. 

We all like these cases as we had them since primary school except they were shaped like Mikey's head and the like. My other memory about that early "kit experience" is that the eraser was either rock hard and ripped the sheet right away, or smelled like sweets - probably harmfuls chemicals.
Not having anything less intelligent to add here, I wish you fun using it and leave a link which may be appropriate sometime

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is not rare at all, the dial code and case code don't usually match.
    • Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
×
×
  • Create New...