Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Has anyone come across this problem before? I'm nearly through disassembling my 7734 but have run into an odd issue - there is no way I can see how to remove the fourth wheel.

It has two long pivots and no amount of manoeuvring will get it out. I'm not going to force it and will just clean the wheel with the train bridge in place. 

I'm just wondering how odd this is and how it's ended up this way.

IMG_0029.thumb.JPG.9b7ff27f43f693434c274e87b880ce9e.JPGIMG_0030.thumb.JPG.d5cdaa18563053837023463fd43e5d07.JPG

Posted

interesting problem you have. Based on your pictures and me confirming it by looking at the parts list there is no way that you can get that out yet it is a separate component and somehow comes out? Even more mysterious is the link below assembly photos where it just tactically somehow fits in? NASA have a link to a service guide you should build a asked what are we not seeing on the discussion below.

https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/10627-assembling-a-valjoux-7734-chronograph/

  • Thanks 1
Posted

I was using the original 7733/4 technical guide, no mention of an integral 4th wheel, just another part. If it was a scrap movement then I'd do some investigating but for now I'll just have to imagine how it's been put together. 

Cheers John. 

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for the replies! Here's a photo of the front of the clock and a GIF animation of the movement (exposed by removing the black cap in the centre of the clock). You can see the behaviour of the gears. It's a fairly valuable clock from the 80s (Braun ABW 35). I'm not sure if replacing the movement would diminish the value, so I'd prefer to keep the original parts if it's easy to fix. But since the movement itself is pretty generic, I guess, maybe replacing it wouldn't make any difference with regard to the value of the clock? Or would it? I suppose the value is mostly in the design.
    • Well, my fundamental stance is that I want to go in and out without leaving any trace other than a shining, perfectly running movement. So, no scratchings on the inside of the case back lid, no marred screws, no debris, no fingerprints, and so on. That is, my goal is to make it impossible for the FBI to track me down. As a professional, I suppose you might want to keep track of returning watches, but as @JohnR725 mentioned, we can keep detailed computer records without marking the watch at all. That may not be true for every watch, but luxury and COSC-certified movements do have unique numbers. John also says it’s best to leave no sign you were ever there, and I couldn't agree more. Now, suppose the Sea-Dweller I'm working on is one day scrapped, and you want to sell the case-back separately (perhaps the case was destroyed in a plane crash). Then the scribbles on the inside no longer reflect the current movement inside the case. Also, the engraving will likely halve the market value of the case back. It had been "sleeping" for about a week and a half. Yes, the "debris/old lubricant" theory is my hypothesis as well! It will be interesting to see what I find once I have time to start disassembling the movement.
    • I've repaired a few of these, having some success with stripping and cleaning the mechanism.  They are so cheap though, its hardly worth the effort in many cases.
    • Get well soon Old Hippy, torn muscles.,  not good
    • Id love to see how he has the output shaft mounted to this setup, as I have the same rotary stage and stepper in my build.
×
×
  • Create New...